Yes they did. I read it and was shocked. It had 39 references in it. Then they also wrote a derogatory post about his wife already dating some rapper. I was in shock. To me, it proves some demoncrats are in on this because they informed these sites it was coming and they had their articles ready.
Has anyone else realized that intel agencies are responsible for:
Infiltrating and subverting sovereign nations in order to create chaos, wars and regime change
Countless murders and assassinations globally
Being agent provocateurs, pitting one group against another, from the shadows
Human trafficking, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking
Propaganda and psyops using EVERY "channel" of communication available - print, television, movies, "news outlets" - including Wikipedia, PBS, NPR and every other "public" and "free for the good of society" outlet
Control of voting systems, calling elections etc, globally
Using advanced weapons and systems not in the public domain
"Newscasters", anchors AND ALL major influencers are intel operatives
American found The New York Times and Los Angeles Times both wrote about Charlie Kirk being murdered before he was murdered
Normally this could be something called article backdating but according to Grok research, there is no history these articles being backdated. It’s real
The only explanation Grok could come up with for this is it’s a “search engine glitch, or edited” Since it doesn’t look like this is edited, and it’s highly unlikely this is a “glitch,” this is every suspicious
I’ll include Grok’s findings at the end of the video.... Very suspicious,, like a (GO) was given!?!
Add to the sadness of Charlie's death. This could be done to cover up the revelations coming out, today, by Tucker about 9-11. It was a professional hit and I am thinking mossad for the benefit of the globalist cabal. Anyway, we can't do anything other than pray.
Today, Tucker has a great documentary coming out about 9-11. Trump also knows the truth about it. What a very sad and effective distraction for everyone. I recognize at this time, Charlie's assassination is comparable in magnitude to 9-11. The bad guys are too good at distraction and evil.😕
I saw something here about Wikipedia having a fully researched article about the assassination written and posted WAY fast.
Yes they did. I read it and was shocked. It had 39 references in it. Then they also wrote a derogatory post about his wife already dating some rapper. I was in shock. To me, it proves some demoncrats are in on this because they informed these sites it was coming and they had their articles ready.
I believe that was a community note, but Wikipedia guidelines let it exist nonetheless.
Has anyone else realized that intel agencies are responsible for:
Infiltrating and subverting sovereign nations in order to create chaos, wars and regime change
Countless murders and assassinations globally
Being agent provocateurs, pitting one group against another, from the shadows
Human trafficking, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking
Propaganda and psyops using EVERY "channel" of communication available - print, television, movies, "news outlets" - including Wikipedia, PBS, NPR and every other "public" and "free for the good of society" outlet
Control of voting systems, calling elections etc, globally
Using advanced weapons and systems not in the public domain
"Newscasters", anchors AND ALL major influencers are intel operatives
Former Director of 🤡s John Stockwell in 1989 tells us what they've been doing (7 min)
Thanks for this link. This should be its own post!
Was the award winning photographer there, using high speed cameras?
Media already wrote it prior?
Tell me it's Israel without telling me it's Israel
Agree...... Who owns those Newspapers?
Who controlled the textbooks? Ghislaine Maxwells father.
American found The New York Times and Los Angeles Times both wrote about Charlie Kirk being murdered before he was murdered
Normally this could be something called article backdating but according to Grok research, there is no history these articles being backdated. It’s real
The only explanation Grok could come up with for this is it’s a “search engine glitch, or edited” Since it doesn’t look like this is edited, and it’s highly unlikely this is a “glitch,” this is every suspicious
I’ll include Grok’s findings at the end of the video.... Very suspicious,, like a (GO) was given!?!
Kinda makes one think the whole thing was ... planned.
Sure does.
NYT headline was worded such that he merely died. Like he choked on a pretzel. No you asses he was murdered.
Add to the sadness of Charlie's death. This could be done to cover up the revelations coming out, today, by Tucker about 9-11. It was a professional hit and I am thinking mossad for the benefit of the globalist cabal. Anyway, we can't do anything other than pray.
Today, Tucker has a great documentary coming out about 9-11. Trump also knows the truth about it. What a very sad and effective distraction for everyone. I recognize at this time, Charlie's assassination is comparable in magnitude to 9-11. The bad guys are too good at distraction and evil.😕
She's saying this based on Google's news feed. That thing reads any time in the source of a page and will decide it's the article's actual time stamp.