Hillary's Official Twitter Account Just Changed To The Background Of A Q Drop!
WHITE HATS SENDING OBVIOUS COMMS! 🔥
(media.greatawakening.win)
Q-INCIDENCE
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
I'm confused about the downvotes in your post. Usually downvotes are about something that is strongly disagreed with on a fundamental level (like the tenets of religion e.g.). The claim in this post is that Hitlery is already dead. True or not (my beliefs are irrelevant), the statement isn't, imo, that important, so why the strong dislikes?
My investigation often takes on a "meta'" approach. From what I've seen, what is said isn't the most important thing. What the actual truth is isn't the most important thing. What is most important is how strongly a person's attachments are to their "truth". Such "ratioed" voting usually indicates "strong truths." So why this topic?
There's no confirmation that Hillary is dead. Whitehats being in control of her twitter does not mean Hillary is dead.
However, most anons have already speculated that Hillary may be dead. I'd venture to say there isn't a single anon that would emphatically state that Hillary is still alive.
Like me, I speculate that Hillary is probably dead. Speculate. As in ... its a possibility. Probably a high possibility.
Then comes along JT17. For him, it's not speculation. For him, it's 100% certainty, as if he is "in the know", with a sprinkling of heavy "I am part of the Q team" vibes.
JT17 presents his certainty as though he was a fly sitting on the wall when she was executed. And for JT17, the purpose of this revelation is crystal clear. It's so you accept him as infallible at making predictions.
Because, for some odd reason, in this community of anonymous individuals, he believes it is his task to build a name for himself and gain a following as being an accurate prophet and/or Q team member "wink wink".
The downvotes aren't because people hope Hillary is alive. They're over JT17's flamboyant and ridiculous insistence that he should take Q's vagueness and spell it out as though he's "in the know", without anything backing up his certainty other than "trust me bro".
Imagine putting a disclaimer that you're not going to give sauce because people won't accept the sauce. JT17 is the antithesis of Q.
Fair enough.
I picked up a few haters here that I now own.
They have nothing meaningful to offer, and I'm an easy target because I speak in very definitive terms.
See #1 and #2 of Tactical Discussion Framework.
https://files.catbox.moe/mh2spy.png
I'm only responding here because he is in violation of #2 "misrepresentation."
For instance magavoices accused me of saying 'the white hats killed Charlie Kirk' on my "Shot heard around the world" post even though I directly addressed that before he ever typed it.
If popular opinion on GAW was in line with his nonsense, I would never get more than a dozen up votes on anything I post… And therefore would stop posting.
That's the "free market" model in action.
Bad "product" = no upvotes.
He makes things up in his head that are completely contrary to the words that I write.
This is evident by simply reading my posts/comments.
So it's either very poor reading comprehension skills…
OR
He's a simple shill/hater that deliberately distorts what I say because he has nothing of any real value to offer to GAW.
I tend to think it's the latter because it's supported by lack of any compelling or interesting post/comment history... and honestly no one could be that stupid that consistently.