You expel toxins, someone else is incidentally exposed to them.
That's "poisoning", not "contagion.
They either do or don’t have a terrain capable of dealing with them.
The terrain theorists are lost in MATERIALISM, just like the establishment doctors. They're still operating from Antoine BeChamp's 1870s theories about "healthy terrain". Which, for the record, were quite reasonable to theorize during his time.
Concurrent with BeChamp's time was the work of Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, Prentice Mulford, Mary Baker Eddy (Christian Science) and Dr. Joseph Murphy positing dis-ease causation was generated "spiritually" or "metaphysically". That "first cause" was NOT MATERIAL. In the 1980s, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer systemitized these ideas into something that could be scientifically demonstrated.
All of these people were saying the same thing. I have simplified and modernized what they were saying into this simply pithy statement; All dis-ease is caused by SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS.
Our establishment doctors and all the well-known "terrain theorists" have all been trained and heavily brainwashed into MATERIALISTIC paradigms, such that they cannot even contemplate these ideas. They are dismissed out of hand because they're unable to perceive "feelings", which are "metaphysical' in nature, with their five senses. And therefore this rejected as "unscientific".
But much like the mainstream 'Germs-Genes" model of deception being completely unscientific, so too is the terrain theorists "toxins" model. Not a one of them can prove "X" causes "Y" with even a scintilla of science to back up their claims.
I often point to the "smoking causes lung cancer" lie to call out both groups of materialists at once. It's been well-established in highly suppressed, but comprehensive epidemiological studies, that less than 10% of heavy smokers (2 packs a day for at least 20 years) ever get lung cancer. The one thing all these materialist health advocates agree upon, is actually a gigantic fear-mongering deception.
All the non-materialists i listed above would identify FEAR/WORRY/FRIGHT as the cause. Dr. Hamer more specifically defined lung cancer was the result of a 'Death-Fright Conflict".
Now apply that notion to everybody trying to frighten a smoker with 'getting lung cancer" in order to motivate them to quit. There's the recipe, in plain sight.
Still “contagious”, just not by replicating invisible bogeymen.
Ha, appreciate your final salvo! Indeed, the whole idea that these invisible boogeymen actually attach to a fictional "cell receptor", having the right "key" enzyme to "trick" it, only to then enter the interior of the cell where it attaches to the non-existent "endoplasmic reticulum ER)" which is just a staining artifact, traveling through the fictional and non-existent golgi complex (which is actually just an air bubble) and traveling through the unproven and fictional "DNA/RNA transcription process", which relies on all these fictional 'cellular organelles".
It's all one lie, stacked upon another, and another, and another. Which is why it's easiest to just start all the way upstream and question the existence of the boogeyman, as yet, undiscovered in reality - the fluids or tissues of a sick person.
The truth shall indeed set you free my friend! The lies just hold us in bondage.
Excellent wording of a problem I’m aware of but do still have some struggles with.
Whether it’s fully right here or not… tbd, but it’s usually not wrong to have a better mindset in that direction, and I’m convinced that a proper mindset in this direction can result in miracles, by grace.
13 projects spending our $50 mil for what??
Ban the fucking poison shots. Free. And effective.
Indeed. Considering germ theory is a hoax, contagion is a myth and boogeyman-viruses don't even exist, what's left to discuss?
Oh wait, I forgot, nobody wants to discuss the truth.
Truth is treason in the empire of lies! And our entirely fraudulent medical system is 100% part of the "empire".
Contagion is sortof true under terrain theory.
You expel toxins, someone else is incidentally exposed to them.
They either do or don’t have a terrain capable of dealing with them.
Still “contagious”, just not by replicating invisible bogeymen.
Ha, "sort of"... :)
That's "poisoning", not "contagion.
The terrain theorists are lost in MATERIALISM, just like the establishment doctors. They're still operating from Antoine BeChamp's 1870s theories about "healthy terrain". Which, for the record, were quite reasonable to theorize during his time.
Concurrent with BeChamp's time was the work of Phineas Parkhurst Quimby, Prentice Mulford, Mary Baker Eddy (Christian Science) and Dr. Joseph Murphy positing dis-ease causation was generated "spiritually" or "metaphysically". That "first cause" was NOT MATERIAL. In the 1980s, Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer systemitized these ideas into something that could be scientifically demonstrated.
All of these people were saying the same thing. I have simplified and modernized what they were saying into this simply pithy statement; All dis-ease is caused by SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS.
Our establishment doctors and all the well-known "terrain theorists" have all been trained and heavily brainwashed into MATERIALISTIC paradigms, such that they cannot even contemplate these ideas. They are dismissed out of hand because they're unable to perceive "feelings", which are "metaphysical' in nature, with their five senses. And therefore this rejected as "unscientific".
But much like the mainstream 'Germs-Genes" model of deception being completely unscientific, so too is the terrain theorists "toxins" model. Not a one of them can prove "X" causes "Y" with even a scintilla of science to back up their claims.
I often point to the "smoking causes lung cancer" lie to call out both groups of materialists at once. It's been well-established in highly suppressed, but comprehensive epidemiological studies, that less than 10% of heavy smokers (2 packs a day for at least 20 years) ever get lung cancer. The one thing all these materialist health advocates agree upon, is actually a gigantic fear-mongering deception.
All the non-materialists i listed above would identify FEAR/WORRY/FRIGHT as the cause. Dr. Hamer more specifically defined lung cancer was the result of a 'Death-Fright Conflict".
Now apply that notion to everybody trying to frighten a smoker with 'getting lung cancer" in order to motivate them to quit. There's the recipe, in plain sight.
Ha, appreciate your final salvo! Indeed, the whole idea that these invisible boogeymen actually attach to a fictional "cell receptor", having the right "key" enzyme to "trick" it, only to then enter the interior of the cell where it attaches to the non-existent "endoplasmic reticulum ER)" which is just a staining artifact, traveling through the fictional and non-existent golgi complex (which is actually just an air bubble) and traveling through the unproven and fictional "DNA/RNA transcription process", which relies on all these fictional 'cellular organelles".
It's all one lie, stacked upon another, and another, and another. Which is why it's easiest to just start all the way upstream and question the existence of the boogeyman, as yet, undiscovered in reality - the fluids or tissues of a sick person.
The truth shall indeed set you free my friend! The lies just hold us in bondage.
Excellent wording of a problem I’m aware of but do still have some struggles with.
Whether it’s fully right here or not… tbd, but it’s usually not wrong to have a better mindset in that direction, and I’m convinced that a proper mindset in this direction can result in miracles, by grace.
Just brought this up with u/joanofsnark a few days ago (or rather asked and she answered). https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0UqAqmI/remember-when-kimmel-said-iverme/c/4eWc6B54asz
Coercion under threat of prison by their Gestapo isn’t ‘willingly giving’.