The site might have these problems, but the owner acknowledges Q positively while other creditable news sites never go this far in terms of deep information.
You can't usually post all the information you want in one go unless you do it in the thread in comments, usually these articles have it all posted nearly for people to read.
Hence organization than dispersed, plus I notice he tends to get critical information posted on his site before anyone else does. Such as the National Guard deployments nationwide, which I find to be very important.
This site recently didn't have that crap, I just messaged the owner about the recent Mcafee spam links. I'll stop posting articles from that site until it gets resolved, but if National Guard deployments start. I wouldn't know where to find them besides TGP.
It’s just general best practice to remove a tweet from the page if the story is just a wrapper. Also adding a nitter link and/or threadreaderapp link to go with the X one, and removing all the & URL tracking parameters.
Nothing to do with you or that specific site, just provides a lower degree of network visibility with less exposure to potential virus/malware/spam/cpu usage/faster loading/etc. Opsec + ease of use anon! Also with the flood of info, the less waste that has to be scrolled/dug through, the better.
Nothing personal fren - call it a pet peeve... Some of these sites are absolute shit show dumpster fires.
This one I tried scrolling down on mobile and three times I got a McAfee virus scan bs popup/redirect - couldn't even read what the article said.
If I was on the PC it'd be fine. I just think of some of the less tech savvy viewing it and their experience...
In these situations, if I'm going to make a post and the absolute only source is a shit site, I either get the archive link, extract the pertinent text and tweets or put it in a PDF and catbox it.
Yeah...its a LOT more work, but I feel it's the right thing to do... because what good is a shitty link where my fellow frens get hooked by a phishing scam, virus or just generally pissed off?
Thanks for contacting the site owner... maybe someone can tell GWP that people avoid going there now when they see a post linked to it. You have to hit back 4x in order to decouple from GWP... like a desperate clingy GF...
Of course, I appreciate your response. I had to contact him through his store page for these issues, otherwise he wants me to contact him through a letter in the mail as his website says and I'm not in a position to do that.
The site might have these problems, but the owner acknowledges Q positively while other creditable news sites never go this far in terms of deep information.
You can't usually post all the information you want in one go unless you do it in the thread in comments, usually these articles have it all posted nearly for people to read.
Hence organization than dispersed, plus I notice he tends to get critical information posted on his site before anyone else does. Such as the National Guard deployments nationwide, which I find to be very important.
large number of ads = greed or need
it's about money regardless. God knows the true motive.
I don't usually judge on that alone. Just use Brave with all Shields.
This site recently didn't have that crap, I just messaged the owner about the recent Mcafee spam links. I'll stop posting articles from that site until it gets resolved, but if National Guard deployments start. I wouldn't know where to find them besides TGP.
It’s just general best practice to remove a tweet from the page if the story is just a wrapper. Also adding a nitter link and/or threadreaderapp link to go with the X one, and removing all the & URL tracking parameters.
Nothing to do with you or that specific site, just provides a lower degree of network visibility with less exposure to potential virus/malware/spam/cpu usage/faster loading/etc. Opsec + ease of use anon! Also with the flood of info, the less waste that has to be scrolled/dug through, the better.
Nothing personal fren - call it a pet peeve... Some of these sites are absolute shit show dumpster fires.
This one I tried scrolling down on mobile and three times I got a McAfee virus scan bs popup/redirect - couldn't even read what the article said.
If I was on the PC it'd be fine. I just think of some of the less tech savvy viewing it and their experience...
In these situations, if I'm going to make a post and the absolute only source is a shit site, I either get the archive link, extract the pertinent text and tweets or put it in a PDF and catbox it.
Yeah...its a LOT more work, but I feel it's the right thing to do... because what good is a shitty link where my fellow frens get hooked by a phishing scam, virus or just generally pissed off?
Thanks for contacting the site owner... maybe someone can tell GWP that people avoid going there now when they see a post linked to it. You have to hit back 4x in order to decouple from GWP... like a desperate clingy GF...
Of course, I appreciate your response. I had to contact him through his store page for these issues, otherwise he wants me to contact him through a letter in the mail as his website says and I'm not in a position to do that.