We all need to become well-aware and self-educated on Charlie Kirk…
This isn’t trivial or inconsequential
This is a massive false flag / psyop / hoax
Like 9/11
And Donald Trump is right in the middle of it
But Trump is just one man…
So why are all of his worst critics playing along with Charlie Kirk shooting hoax?
CNN, MSNBC, NYTimes all play along
Short video by “Stew Peters” below…
Stew Peters is literally an actor, says so on his wikipedia page
But he’s a controlled opposition
His job in this video is to convince you Charlie Kirk was killed by Israel
So there are currently several different conspiracy theories about how Charlie Kirk actually died
They have one suspect in custody
And yet the Internet flooded with all kinds of videos just like 9/11 Sandy Hook Boston Marathon bombing
And every single different variation on the story…
keeps you in the matrix
They don’t care who you think killed Charlie Kirk….
So long as you think he’s dead…
But they amplifying these Israeli conspiracy theories,
in order to have pre-text for the legislative backlash
that will come in the form of new hate speech laws
And in particular, as it’s related to antisemitism
Never forget: when the Bolshevik Revolutionaries took over Russia in 1917, and the first thng they did was make it illegal to criticize their new overlords,
and they did this with hate speech laws
and then equating dissent, opposition, criticism, as antisemitism
And then they proceeded to kill 10’s of millions of Russian Christians
And Charlie Kirk is the trigger and pretext they will use to do it to American Christians…
What if there were two versions of the CK assassination? One was the real thing that happened and the other is a AI copy that altered a few vital aspects of the assassination. Oh, I wish I could type what my brain is thinking, yet I don't have the ability to put my thoughts into words. I feel AI has the capability to take a scene of people and have bad actors imposed into the scene to be shown as a shooter, someone running across a roof top, someone walking across a road with a limp, someone yelling in the background. I think AI can add these types of act/actors to a regular person's video, if necessary. I think AI can take someone's pictures and adjust them to show what really wasn't there and place it into the pic. We are watching a movie, as Q has said, yet he didn't say how the movie was put together. I think that maybe AI has infiltrated a lot of the camera's at that event to move reality from what was really there to something that is fake so Charlie can exit stage left without really dying. (This theory means that AI was used by the government because it has the most AI resources and can do whatever it wants in a short amount of time.)
I agree.
I also know how it feels to not know how to put my thoughts into words
I knew what i was seeing, and thinking, but the only way i could describe it is “like a movie”
like, they are all actors.
the good guys, the bad guys
they all go out for drinks together after a hard day of crisis acting
later, the word “hoax” emerged,
probably originating from Sandy Hook
the word “hoax” really seemed to be effective in getting thru to normies
later, when Donald Trump started saying “fake news” and “very fake news….
You are watching a movie
Have you noticed the down doots we've gotten on this topic? It's not like we are trashing Israel, just saying CK might not be what he's expected to be. Are the down dooters CK fanboys or Stew Peters'? Oh well, we just toss out possible ideas and some folks don't like those ideas. Or, are we over the target like when the Israelis down doot anybody who says they are not good people? Kek, Love your thesis, VCS. Please keep them coming.
Yes, I have noticed, and they come in fast too. I had three down votes on a new post within a few minutes, so I suspect that whoever notices the post first sends it to their friend who also down votes it. Seems like coordinated burying
Thanks for your support
Israel shot Charlie Kirk and we all have to spread the word! ;)
https://greatawakening.win/p/1AR0eJBaHo/
Prime example: https://rumble.com/vt5bnx-ashley-babbit-is-not-dead.-jan-6-the-capitol-shooting.html
You trigger a memory, I recall, way before the current AI wave, seeing a bit about product placement in TV/Movies. It was explained that it was possible to put, for example, a box of branded washing powder on a shelf in a TV show that was a re-run. It was not there in the original filming but could be added for a fee when it was re-run. Other re-runs on other channels could insert whatever they were paying for.
On the flipside, you might have seen shows, for example "Americas Got Talent" where the hosts are all drinking from Cocoa-Cola branded cups. When shown in other territories, those cups are blurred out, because Cocoa-Cola is not paying for those eyeballs, so, presumably a computer can blur the video as needed.
I am merely saying the tech seems to have pre-dated the current wave of AI and been commercially deployed.