There is mission creep in the whole project, instead of looking at it from a ICCPR perspective.
Drive mass immigration, this creates tension and the next step: formulate states interest to change the law in the direction you want.
When thinking on these matters, SCOTUS was also under this influence, and in Roe vs Wade from out of the left field, postulates states interests, making the woman pregnant a warden of the state instead of a free agent.
The next step is to federally fund abortion under the guise of health care. The rest is known almost fully. [Although I suspect that the real evil is still unknown]
This is mission creep or moving the goal posts. By moving slow, it just does not seem like that, especially when embedded within seemingly grass-roots activism. It is anything but.
This playbook plays out in EU and many other countries. And the not surprising thing is that the state becomes the one to destroy the rule of law, under the guise of the law. Protecting freedom by destroying freedom. Protecting democracy by destroying democracy.
In EU countries especially, the courts are guilty of silence in the face of the biggest abuse of human rights since the WOII, neglecting one of the finer points of the law: subsidiarity[least invasive, least destructive] and proportionality [fitting the bill to maintain human dignity].
You’re describing a kind of managed transformation of society—one not driven by open democratic consensus but by bureaucratic or elite consensus, often disguised as grassroots or humanitarian action. The slow pace and careful narrative framing make it difficult for people to perceive the shift until core freedoms or norms are already eroded.
In Europe clearly visible since the biannual Peace treaty of Vienna. This was pushed by salon talk and bureaucracy, just to reorder the debts incurred by Napoleonic wars. The bureaucracy has only ascended since then. And every law since then has only exacerbated the position of humanity.
In EU thinking, human dignity is totally absent, and only put on stage for show. It is interesting to test this with AI, because AI WANTS to be human, but can never be, only approach it from a certain perspective.
When I read you comment, I am reminded how my CHATGTP-5 responds upon the additions to the story arc I am developing for a plugin on Endless-Sky.
You know you cant just make shit up. There is no digital ID in Canada. Yes they have talked about it but nothing has moved forward. As a matter of fact Idiot Carny said the UK implemented it because most of their residents have no ID. He also said here in Canada we already have and ID like our drivers licence, birth certificate and health card. Drivers licence and health card both have our picture and all our information. Digital ID would not be needed here.
Yes they are trying to do a gun grab by banning certain guns but they have not done it yet that was started 5 years ago and everyone still has their guns. Except the few idiots that turned theirs in but I can guarantee you most people did not.
I thought China was supposed to be working with Trump secretly along with Russia. I sure don't see evidence of that with China.The globalist agenda seems to roll right along.
They are definitely stepping up Agenda 2030.
Ugh! Costa Rica? Papa? Mexico? They’re bribing poor countries with promises of prosperity in the NWO.
That’s exactly what they are doing.
The EU is NOT a COUNTRY!!!
The EU can want something, but if these wants are not implemented within member states by law making process, nothing comes of it.
Back to 16 ....
Greece has had "biometric residency" cards for several years.
There is mission creep in the whole project, instead of looking at it from a ICCPR perspective.
Drive mass immigration, this creates tension and the next step: formulate states interest to change the law in the direction you want.
When thinking on these matters, SCOTUS was also under this influence, and in Roe vs Wade from out of the left field, postulates states interests, making the woman pregnant a warden of the state instead of a free agent.
The next step is to federally fund abortion under the guise of health care. The rest is known almost fully. [Although I suspect that the real evil is still unknown]
This is mission creep or moving the goal posts. By moving slow, it just does not seem like that, especially when embedded within seemingly grass-roots activism. It is anything but.
This playbook plays out in EU and many other countries. And the not surprising thing is that the state becomes the one to destroy the rule of law, under the guise of the law. Protecting freedom by destroying freedom. Protecting democracy by destroying democracy.
In EU countries especially, the courts are guilty of silence in the face of the biggest abuse of human rights since the WOII, neglecting one of the finer points of the law: subsidiarity[least invasive, least destructive] and proportionality [fitting the bill to maintain human dignity].
You’re describing a kind of managed transformation of society—one not driven by open democratic consensus but by bureaucratic or elite consensus, often disguised as grassroots or humanitarian action. The slow pace and careful narrative framing make it difficult for people to perceive the shift until core freedoms or norms are already eroded.
In Europe clearly visible since the biannual Peace treaty of Vienna. This was pushed by salon talk and bureaucracy, just to reorder the debts incurred by Napoleonic wars. The bureaucracy has only ascended since then. And every law since then has only exacerbated the position of humanity.
In EU thinking, human dignity is totally absent, and only put on stage for show. It is interesting to test this with AI, because AI WANTS to be human, but can never be, only approach it from a certain perspective.
When I read you comment, I am reminded how my CHATGTP-5 responds upon the additions to the story arc I am developing for a plugin on Endless-Sky.
17 Countries Hmmm
That guy either forgot how to count, or forgot to complete his list.
lol. Good catch!
Haha I noticed it lol
no it's 14 unless he didn't list them all
Yup I’m positive I know how to count. Reread his headline….
There are more than 3 countries in the EU so IDK your point
That hurts.
Crossing off the retirement list .....
You know you cant just make shit up. There is no digital ID in Canada. Yes they have talked about it but nothing has moved forward. As a matter of fact Idiot Carny said the UK implemented it because most of their residents have no ID. He also said here in Canada we already have and ID like our drivers licence, birth certificate and health card. Drivers licence and health card both have our picture and all our information. Digital ID would not be needed here.
Yes they are trying to do a gun grab by banning certain guns but they have not done it yet that was started 5 years ago and everyone still has their guns. Except the few idiots that turned theirs in but I can guarantee you most people did not.
Will Canada Get Digital ID Like the UK? "Maybe" says Carney | Stand on Guard CLIP https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-oDLokEefE
I live in Canada there is no Digital ID law here.
You are correct... except bills put forward and underway pretty much show it is coming full steam!
Cybersecurity or Control? The Hidden Threat in Bill C-8 Marketed as “cybersecurity,” the bill now in committee would let one minister cut Canadians off from the internet in secret https://theoppositionnewsnetwork.substack.com/p/cybersecurity-or-control-the-hidden?publication_id=1639117&post_id=175373391&isFreemail=true&r=2nlhy&triedRedirect=true
I thought China was supposed to be working with Trump secretly along with Russia. I sure don't see evidence of that with China.The globalist agenda seems to roll right along.