That's such a good idea they should go back to the original intent on the entire Bill of Rights. The meaning of a lot of the amendments has been diluted over time.
That's such a good idea they should go back to the original intent on the entire Bill of Rights.
I agree in a way (that we need to reform the Bill of Rights), and completely disagree in another. You seem to assume that the original intent was good as it was. I could go through all the flaws I've found, but since it is relevant to the 14th, I'll focus on just this one:
Section 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law... shall not be questioned.
It seems that there are some people here that don't understand what that means. I can understand that. The legal magicians use many "addendums" and obfuscations to cast their spell, so I'll "spell" it out for you.
At the time of this amendment, we had just gone through the Civil War. We were massively indebt. Who were we indebted to? Quite a few people actually, but most importantly, we were indebted to the Banksters (specifically Rothschild). We are STILL indebt to that same entity. We never got out of that debt. In fact, we were so indebted at the time of this amendment, it was almost impossible to get out of it.
The Civil War was paid for by Rothschild on both sides (from before it started actually). The the legal phrasing of the 14th amendment ensures that we can't default on a debt, thus ensuring that all of the people of the United States (not the government AKA the corporate entity, but the people) could not ever be free (legally) from that obligation. These debts, through the 14th Amendment, were a legally binding contract between the debtors (all of the people of the United States) and the lenders (the various bankers (also people), but ultimately the Rothschilds).
So who owns the debt? The usurers (Banksters).
What is the contract that the Banksters own because of the 14th Amendment? An indenture, or bond. (Note: a bond is a security, the indenture is the legal framework that details how the bond operates.) This indenture is a legally binding contract between people (about 300+Million people between a few Bond holders) that can never be abolished. What do you call an indenture that you inherit from your parents that you can't ever pay off?
We call that slavery. You are legally owned.
Through the 14th Amendment, We The People are legally indentured for all generations to the Banksters. Through the Civil War, that debt was so massive, we couldn't reasonably pay it off. Through the creation of the Federal Reserve, that indenture went from "basically impossible to pay it off" to actually impossible to pay it off. (Because of the legal contract between the Fed and the US Govt using a nice pretty legal usury system, there isn't enough money in the world to pay it off).
Many people think these problems started in 1913. In truth, it started around 1861.
(It really started earlier than that, but to elaborate I'd have to go through Lincoln; people think he was "a good guy"... To disillusion people of some of the facts bout Lincoln is not something I will go into at this time.)
I'm not a fan of Lincoln either. There were numerous options to fix the unfair tariffs on southern agricultural commerce. His solution was to have us kill each other.
That's such a good idea they should go back to the original intent on the entire Bill of Rights. The meaning of a lot of the amendments has been diluted over time.
I agree in a way (that we need to reform the Bill of Rights), and completely disagree in another. You seem to assume that the original intent was good as it was. I could go through all the flaws I've found, but since it is relevant to the 14th, I'll focus on just this one:
It seems that there are some people here that don't understand what that means. I can understand that. The legal magicians use many "addendums" and obfuscations to cast their spell, so I'll "spell" it out for you.
At the time of this amendment, we had just gone through the Civil War. We were massively indebt. Who were we indebted to? Quite a few people actually, but most importantly, we were indebted to the Banksters (specifically Rothschild). We are STILL indebt to that same entity. We never got out of that debt. In fact, we were so indebted at the time of this amendment, it was almost impossible to get out of it.
The Civil War was paid for by Rothschild on both sides (from before it started actually). The the legal phrasing of the 14th amendment ensures that we can't default on a debt, thus ensuring that all of the people of the United States (not the government AKA the corporate entity, but the people) could not ever be free (legally) from that obligation. These debts, through the 14th Amendment, were a legally binding contract between the debtors (all of the people of the United States) and the lenders (the various bankers (also people), but ultimately the Rothschilds).
So who owns the debt? The usurers (Banksters).
What is the contract that the Banksters own because of the 14th Amendment? An indenture, or bond. (Note: a bond is a security, the indenture is the legal framework that details how the bond operates.) This indenture is a legally binding contract between people (about 300+Million people between a few Bond holders) that can never be abolished. What do you call an indenture that you inherit from your parents that you can't ever pay off?
We call that slavery. You are legally owned.
Through the 14th Amendment, We The People are legally indentured for all generations to the Banksters. Through the Civil War, that debt was so massive, we couldn't reasonably pay it off. Through the creation of the Federal Reserve, that indenture went from "basically impossible to pay it off" to actually impossible to pay it off. (Because of the legal contract between the Fed and the US Govt using a nice pretty legal usury system, there isn't enough money in the world to pay it off).
Many people think these problems started in 1913. In truth, it started around 1861.
(It really started earlier than that, but to elaborate I'd have to go through Lincoln; people think he was "a good guy"... To disillusion people of some of the facts bout Lincoln is not something I will go into at this time.)
I'm not a fan of Lincoln either. There were numerous options to fix the unfair tariffs on southern agricultural commerce. His solution was to have us kill each other.