Christopher Wray was JUST SERVED with our $25,000,000+ FEDERAL J6 LAWSUIT!!!!
(twitter.com)
𝕃 𝔽 𝔾 ! ! !
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Very very nice win,in the making,
Yes. Get them all with class action lawsuit.
Q said "Trust Wray" ... that's right. We trusted Wray to go to JAIL!!!! HAHAHAHAHAH
Q did say "trust Wray" but then when Q4925 was dropped I understood that "trust Wray" was (clearly) intended to make the deep state think they had fooled the white hats with a sleeper that THEY controlled.
How is this not common knowledge on a dedicated Q board?
Nothing against you specifically AndrewJaqqson but I have to say that some of my "out their conclusions" would probably not be considered so "out there" if everyone was as thoroughly familiar with ALL of Q's drops.
Maybe I just have too much free time on my hands.
u/#q4925.
Gave you a +1 anyway for bringing up the topic u/AndrewJaqqson
A cute little down-doot. Yay.
I love it when folks down vote objectively factual information such as the linking of a Q post directly. 😂
amen
Never thought justice would be served, so thrilled this is happening! Wow! God bless all the people who suffered so much, and even died, because of J6
MAKE CORRUPT PEOPLE PAY, PAY, PAY
Amen
Now do the criminal Jan. 6 'committee'.
It will come
This patriots deserve 25 mil a piece, not total. "even though I do not understand that day.
I agree,, the J6 hostages deserve everything they can get. However, we all know that anything they do get, will be from the American tax payers. No one who is truly responsible will ever pay one dime.
It's strange Q said trust Wray.
Umm guys... Q4925 later showed "trust Wray" to be necessary Disinfo.
u/#q4925
I got you.
👌
Playing his role
Maybe.
Trust Wray to do the wrong thing.
That's right.
Q said to trust him so he goes to jail LMAO
Trust him to betray his nation.
Howls. LOL
After making every effort to be sure it was plainly obvious (to assert maximum power) that they had stolen the 2020 presidential election, Democrats learned that Republicans would freely assemble to speak, pray, and petition the govt for redress of grievances—all of which are God-given, natural human rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.
So they staged a movie production to make it appear as if the good people were criminals having an insurrection, with bad actors in MAGA costumes positioned throughout the crowd committing crimes, as Democrats conducted a blatant coup d'état and literally overthrew the legitimately re-elected president of the United States.
Then the bad people prosecuted the innocent good people, and bad judges convicted them and imprisoned them in a torture dungeon.
Now you understand that day.
Now these cases need to be tried in a court with a Trump appointed judge. And maybe a Trump appointed prosecutor.
A court with Trump as the Judge.
qeq
Trump has many dragon ladies working for him.
Earl Epp and Nancy the drunker needs to be in the spot light too, oh who killed Seth Richard and Charlie Kurt while at it? 💥💥💥🇺🇸
Nothing hidden shall not come to light.
This is the way. Now Trump needs to deny them government funds for their defence due to acting outside the scope of their contract / acting illegally.
Set a precedent. Make them think twice about their actions.
Yes, he holds the Trump card.
I'm still wondering why Q said Trust Wray. Wray is asshoe.
Perhaps it means "Even though Wray is corrupt, trust Wray" as in trust justice will come his way and prosecute his corrupt ass. Lets be honest, we were all demoralized when he was there, and waiting for justice to be served. Maybe the "trust Wray" meant "dont freak out when Wray is still in the FBI"
Me 3
Not to denigrate Mr Lang, but "The 274+ Undercover FBI Agents that infiltrated our PEACEFUL PROTEST will...."
It's been made clear that the so called 274 that 'infiltrated' is actually mostly agents who were called to the scene as the incident progressed, and were not there before or during the instigation.
Where there undercover agents (or operatives) inciting the incident? Very little doubt about that. But how many of them were FBI? Not that many, as far as I know.
If I recall correctly, there were Ukrainians, there was the Proud Boys etc, (suspected to have been led by agents), but probably lots of operatives, and how many FBI would be needed or deployed for that purpose?
I want all of them Pelosi started it, so I can imagine they are all there including Bidan.
They are all guilty.
To be fair, if you were TORTURED for 1467 days. You wouldnt even BE ABLE to text what I'm texting.
I am sure.
U got em dude.
Yeah. I like that.
as of this morn....
AI----I could not locate any verified federal court docket or publicly filed complaint document accessible through reputable court-docket portals that clearly shows a civil lawsuit filed by Jake Lang naming Christopher Wray and seeking ~$25 million, with a case number, filing date, or certificate of service.
a nothing burger?
the intent and personal involvement hurdles are enormous.
Anyone can file a complaint in federal court, but judges immediately ask:
Did the plaintiff state a plausible claim under law?
Did they show specific facts tying the defendant to the alleged conduct?
Did the defendant act personally or just as part of institutional policy?
If those aren’t there, the case is dismissed — often before discovery even starts.
Wray personally violated a clearly established constitutional right?
Any reasonable official in his position would have known it was unlawful.
That’s almost impossible unless there’s hard evidence directly linking him to something blatantly illegal.
Otherwise, the court says: “Even if the agency made mistakes, that doesn’t make the Director personally liable.” “Ordering infiltration” or “approving torture”
Those allegations require specific intent and direct authorization — not just “it happened under his leadership.”
Unless a plaintiff can produce a memo, recording, or testimony showing Wray gave explicit illegal orders, it won’t clear the threshold.
Without that, it looks like a political grievance, not a legally actionable claim.
So yes — from a legal standpoint, unless there’s provable intent and direct personal involvement, this kind of lawsuit is functionally DOA (a nothing burger).
interesting
I understand. It's hard to go to court.