Did The NSA Create Bitcoin? Source in Comments
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
And med beds, sure.
No, quantum computers are worse than AI in terms of usability and have never been proven to get anywhere. The reason for this is that the whole industry is using the wrong assumptions in exactly the same way that Heisenberg had the wrong assumptions and couldn't build a bomb.
I'll grant you that, whatever the current recommended length is for your prime numbers, the NSA is many digits ahead of that, but it's because of ordinary computing power and not any "quantum" advance. I'm pretty confident that doesn't help them if you use ordinary math and situational precautions. It's much easier for them to obtain the password by humint than brute force, and that's what they rely on.
If Quantum computers could break cryptography, the whole digital world and internet would be screwed. Banks would have to go offline and operate like the 1900s. Companies would have all their sensitive information at risk.
I'm hopeful that someone will figure out Quantum resistant encryption, because every country and corporation are incentivized to do so.
However, even if encryption was solved, which ever company made Quantum computers first could have a monopoly on mining Bitcoin and could censor the network. What's your opinion on how to solve that problem? A quantum resistant mining algorithm is the only thing i can think of. But i'm having difficulty imaging something that is hard for a quantum computer to do but easy for a normal computer.
The universe is itself a quantum resistant algorithm. I'm confident quantum computing cannot improve significantly on digital computing.
What AI shows is that LLMs are babies when it comes to analysis, hallucinating easily and speaking confidently when mistaken. Quantum computers, if they somehow succeeded in spite of their failed science (which is a dim possibility), would have all the uncertainties of the fuzziness they depend upon and would be mere embryos in abilities to communicate. If we flew in the face of all logic and imagined some army of quantum computers were assembled, it would be like asking what to do about an army of golems or zombis: the slight alleged benefit you get from having such an army is beset by much more significant drawbacks and is quickly offset by the market creating asymmetrical hacks of your power.
As I already hinted, though, Bitcoin is already front-loaded toward favoring its creator first and its early adopters second, so assuming that there was some more powerful way to mine it would not offset the fact that from its inception its creators presumably know more powerful ways to mine it than they let on. (Think SHA backdoor.) In other words, the problem you cite has already been dealt with in a different form by the marketplace, and it will do so again.
The last answer is always that if the cabal succeeds in enslaving bodies and souls it cannot enslave spirits, which are subject to Christ's rule and return. He will reveal the lighted path when all is darkest.