If I were to comment on that I'd say that Ashlandog is, in my opinion, more of a sovereign-nation news junkie than he is a Q person and he has always been like that.
We have quite a few anons, especially in previous years who are not Q supporting. I have had anon DM frens who have admitted as much to me privately. They may be aligned on most subjects we are, but they lack faith in the white hat plan.
As far as I am concerned, even as a moderator, that's OK by me as long as they aren't undermining Q supporting anons to a large extent. I think it's probably healthy that we have these other voices here to keep us from becoming an uncritical echo chamber.
Technically,the sidebar says Q supporters only, but if non Q supporters are sufficiently low profile, I personally value their contribution as a differing PoV.
In another example of heterogeneity of approach, most anons here are Christians and I am not, so I have a different background to my thinking. As long as it's not slowing the group down, it's OK and sometimes it's useful to have this different set of thoughts / positions available in your allies to keep everyone's thinking keen.
Ashland is deff not a shill nor a plant. I've called most of them out already and over half are not posting any more. They have no incentive to. To be wary of them is good looking out though.
Sometimes the post isn't something you share for people to agree with it, its just to get eyes on it. Most of Ashlanddogs posts of the past had a lot of that sentiment, and I have done the same before. I just like to learn and witness and be a part of the discussion. I can be wrong about some things, but my research is well defined and so is my intent.
Ashlandog posts a lot of different things. Always has.
If I were to comment on that I'd say that Ashlandog is, in my opinion, more of a sovereign-nation news junkie than he is a Q person and he has always been like that.
We have quite a few anons, especially in previous years who are not Q supporting. I have had anon DM frens who have admitted as much to me privately. They may be aligned on most subjects we are, but they lack faith in the white hat plan.
As far as I am concerned, even as a moderator, that's OK by me as long as they aren't undermining Q supporting anons to a large extent. I think it's probably healthy that we have these other voices here to keep us from becoming an uncritical echo chamber.
Technically,the sidebar says Q supporters only, but if non Q supporters are sufficiently low profile, I personally value their contribution as a differing PoV.
In another example of heterogeneity of approach, most anons here are Christians and I am not, so I have a different background to my thinking. As long as it's not slowing the group down, it's OK and sometimes it's useful to have this different set of thoughts / positions available in your allies to keep everyone's thinking keen.
Agreed. He's a worldly good doggo fren. Simple as.
Ashland is deff not a shill nor a plant. I've called most of them out already and over half are not posting any more. They have no incentive to. To be wary of them is good looking out though.
Sometimes the post isn't something you share for people to agree with it, its just to get eyes on it. Most of Ashlanddogs posts of the past had a lot of that sentiment, and I have done the same before. I just like to learn and witness and be a part of the discussion. I can be wrong about some things, but my research is well defined and so is my intent.