The question is, was Biden in the same room as the auto sign was? The proxy and the principal must be present together when a proxy signature is utilized for a high-value transaction. This was the rock-solid law when the constitution was written. No one seems focused on the presence requirement: not the President, nor the Republican House members who complained to the President, nor the numerous legal commentators and scholars that we have heard from since the autopen signing occurred. The use of the autopen, itself unproblematic, seems to have eclipsed the more important issue of whether the president was present when it was used. By definition, if a non-presence proxy signature is affixed to a bill, then time is of the essence. When time is of the essence, the consequences of a voided signature are never greater. Since the President has roughly twelve days to sign a bill, a non-presence proxy signature could produce one of two unintended consequences. At best, it would produce a twelve-day period during which the new legislation would not be in effect. At worst, if Congress is not in session at the end of the twelve-day period, it would amount to a pocket veto. Neither case is consistent with well-ordered government. In sum, the President’s use of the autopen (or even a human being) to sign a bill outside of the President’s presence is unconstitutional. This establishes a dangerous precedent, one which every thinking lawyer in Washington politics seemed to have overlooked. Let the autopen episode not be a precedent for this or any other President to follow. The Constitution does not allow for shortcuts.
The question here is whether Biden was mentally capable of delegating that authority. I think not. He didn't even know where he was most of the time. His staffers and Obama were running the country while Biden was sleeping or eating pudding.
The DOJ and FBI are long established deep state centers of corruption. This will help highlight that huge problem. The war continues.
👌🙏🏻👌🙏🏻👌👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
What am I missing? Biden pardoned J6'ers?
no he pardeoned the J6 committee-members. That is those that were persecuting J6ers.
Oh geez...erase them all.
Title not well phrased, im pretty sure was intended to say biden's pardons with the autopen are fraud and those involved should be prosecuted.
And cue the final Jeopardy question music.
wait is james comER different to james comEY or is it just a typo??
Akshully a different guy
OK lol wow. Are they both baddies??
Comer is on our side.
NOICE. I'll have to remember that then lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwVGf-4aNEI
The question is, was Biden in the same room as the auto sign was? The proxy and the principal must be present together when a proxy signature is utilized for a high-value transaction. This was the rock-solid law when the constitution was written. No one seems focused on the presence requirement: not the President, nor the Republican House members who complained to the President, nor the numerous legal commentators and scholars that we have heard from since the autopen signing occurred. The use of the autopen, itself unproblematic, seems to have eclipsed the more important issue of whether the president was present when it was used. By definition, if a non-presence proxy signature is affixed to a bill, then time is of the essence. When time is of the essence, the consequences of a voided signature are never greater. Since the President has roughly twelve days to sign a bill, a non-presence proxy signature could produce one of two unintended consequences. At best, it would produce a twelve-day period during which the new legislation would not be in effect. At worst, if Congress is not in session at the end of the twelve-day period, it would amount to a pocket veto. Neither case is consistent with well-ordered government. In sum, the President’s use of the autopen (or even a human being) to sign a bill outside of the President’s presence is unconstitutional. This establishes a dangerous precedent, one which every thinking lawyer in Washington politics seemed to have overlooked. Let the autopen episode not be a precedent for this or any other President to follow. The Constitution does not allow for shortcuts.
The question here is whether Biden was mentally capable of delegating that authority. I think not. He didn't even know where he was most of the time. His staffers and Obama were running the country while Biden was sleeping or eating pudding.