No, actually its not. The correct expression is "highly suspected". I mean, unless you have direct, actual evidence of Epstein's communications and joint actions with specific Mossad agents.
You cannot attain critical thinking by simply saying "something is well known" even if its highly suspected and accepted as actual fact by people who do not critically require concrete evidence.
unless you have direct, actual evidence of Epstein's communications and joint actions with specific Mossad agents.
That's been confirmed. Look no further than Ehud Barak & Robert Maxwell. If the ISR Minister of Defense was colluding with Epstien then it's highly likely lower hanging ISR officials (and unofficials like Maxwell) were as well.
Just considering officers & staffers for Ehud Barak, this possibility becomes an assurance.
I accept the 'highly likely', but I quibble at claims like "x is well known" or "everybody knows..." which rhetorically pull in the 'it's widely accepted, so x must be true' assertive technique. My objection to the comment has to do with a process of thought and discussion, rather than to what extent Epstein was actually a mossad agent.
With regards to that, I'll admit, I'm not the most informed person on the topic, but it seems the connections between Epstein and Maxwell are asserted but not proven. Ehud Barak appears to be a different case.
No, actually its not. The correct expression is "highly suspected". I mean, unless you have direct, actual evidence of Epstein's communications and joint actions with specific Mossad agents.
You cannot attain critical thinking by simply saying "something is well known" even if its highly suspected and accepted as actual fact by people who do not critically require concrete evidence.
👌👌👌👌
But, but, muhh jooz!
That's been confirmed. Look no further than Ehud Barak & Robert Maxwell. If the ISR Minister of Defense was colluding with Epstien then it's highly likely lower hanging ISR officials (and unofficials like Maxwell) were as well.
Just considering officers & staffers for Ehud Barak, this possibility becomes an assurance.
I accept the 'highly likely', but I quibble at claims like "x is well known" or "everybody knows..." which rhetorically pull in the 'it's widely accepted, so x must be true' assertive technique. My objection to the comment has to do with a process of thought and discussion, rather than to what extent Epstein was actually a mossad agent.
With regards to that, I'll admit, I'm not the most informed person on the topic, but it seems the connections between Epstein and Maxwell are asserted but not proven. Ehud Barak appears to be a different case.