This isn’t news. Cracked the code? It’s well known Soros has been pushing his “Open Society” global collapse/overthrow for decades. It’s his life’s work FFS.
This is a lot more than Soros and his Open Society. It is the relationship with the feds in the Commerce dept, The State Dept. and the Export/Import Bank and the cia. All in bed with Soros Inc. All using your taxpayer dollars and the backing of the US government.
Usually I'm averse to providing the Intel-agency approved version of history on most anything, but for our purposes here it is acceptable, since we're just interested in providing the most basic and broad description of the subject matter.
And just a second point I wanted to mention here, and so I will reply to myself.
Its something I considered while listening to Mike Benz dive into the incredible rabbit hole here, and when he takes on other ones in his amazing and almost inimitable way.
BTW, if you haven't heard about "Mongolia" yet, it CERTAINLY WILL make your head explode, Scanners-style, just as Mike acknowledged. Most likely he went over it during the convo with Tucker, but you don't have to wait for that to drop. He has a recent video that goes into the Epstein cache. Or aside from his channel, just use search terms like "Larry Summers" "Epstein" "Mongolia" "Rio Tinto" ... you'll get there.🤣
Back on topic:
I try to consider the younger readers in the audience or those who just werent politically inclined or otherwise aware of certain events which precede Trump's first term but are still relevant to what is happening in the current timeline.
I believe strongly that NO ONE should feel bad or somehow inferior for being unfamiliar with any information related to topics that we often cover here.
I worry that as the movement has grown and taken shape, that some folks start to get left behind because they just recently began interested to dig deeper or can't make the time commitment to learn about the many rabbit holes we frequent.
Especially in the most recent cycle, much has been made of the "low information, low propensity" voter and Trump's tremendous persuasion power over that group.
While its not exactly a 1:1 match, similar individuals read and sometimes engage with us here on GAW - or at least that is my observation.
Personally I want to be very careful to not discourage such people by coming across as a "know it all" or making them feel inferior in any way, if it becomes apparent that they aren't knowledgeable on the subjects familiar to many of us veterans of GAW.
Unfortunately a great majority of the ignorant and pig headed vitriol we see users sometimes engaged in during arguments stems from information learned via legacy media.
The MSM opinion factory seems to lend itself to providing answers that make people close-minded and overly self assured, for whatever reason.
I think we have to resist urges to showboat or come across as having all the answers.... However, in some cases lack of knowledge can seem like hostility when it isn't meant that way, and we should be careful to recognize one from another, when possible.
Case and point: Benz has a tremendous wealth of a priori knowledge on all of this stuff that would put nearly any of ours to shame - and he is NEVER elitist about it, which is to his great credit and a chief reason WHY he is able to so succinctly pass on simply incredible knowledge and discoveries such as this!
I would point to his approach when relating back information and his overall tone and style as a great example of how to connect with others at all different levels of knowledge. He never sounds cynical towards his audience or as though he puts himself above them. Its something that I want to continue to strive for in my own communication, and it really serves to remove ego and hostility from the scenario and make the information sharing paramount - which is the goal (or should be!), ultimately.
That's it, nothing to debate about really, sorry! Just a small point I wanted to bloviate about, is all. Hah! 🫠
Godspeed.
Benz declined to look at he cables prior to the start of the open society foundation because ... [and here it comes] HE could not fathom it would have any significance.
Read that again and again. Why? Because it showcases personal bias. And for a man who is deep into digging into rabbit holes, even for him this is a strong element.
It also means something else. We all have an idea about how the world works. That idea is usually not only false, but it is totally not workable and functional. On top of this, as another layer of filter, come our convictions and ideals, desires, longing.
This shapes our perspective and thus the answer to the question: this or that.
This isn’t news. Cracked the code? It’s well known Soros has been pushing his “Open Society” global collapse/overthrow for decades. It’s his life’s work FFS.
This is a lot more than Soros and his Open Society. It is the relationship with the feds in the Commerce dept, The State Dept. and the Export/Import Bank and the cia. All in bed with Soros Inc. All using your taxpayer dollars and the backing of the US government.
Fair enough.
Came in to say this. While this is very old news, it is good for all the new frogs to know about.
It doesn't get repeated too often so there may be a lot of peeps who dont know this stuff.
Edit: Reposted for clarity (original post title unclear [upon author's re-reading 😆])
Including a link here to the Wikipedia entry on Wikileaks Cables for those who want more details about that subject.
Usually I'm averse to providing the Intel-agency approved version of history on most anything, but for our purposes here it is acceptable, since we're just interested in providing the most basic and broad description of the subject matter.
Here is the direct Wikileaks entry where you can view the entire contents of the Cablegate library.
Hope these additional resources are useful to readers.
😎
#2Edit: (to mods) - apologies for duplicates posted [and thanks for the sticky!😊]
And just a second point I wanted to mention here, and so I will reply to myself.
Its something I considered while listening to Mike Benz dive into the incredible rabbit hole here, and when he takes on other ones in his amazing and almost inimitable way.
BTW, if you haven't heard about "Mongolia" yet, it CERTAINLY WILL make your head explode, Scanners-style, just as Mike acknowledged. Most likely he went over it during the convo with Tucker, but you don't have to wait for that to drop. He has a recent video that goes into the Epstein cache. Or aside from his channel, just use search terms like "Larry Summers" "Epstein" "Mongolia" "Rio Tinto" ... you'll get there.🤣
Back on topic:
I try to consider the younger readers in the audience or those who just werent politically inclined or otherwise aware of certain events which precede Trump's first term but are still relevant to what is happening in the current timeline.
I believe strongly that NO ONE should feel bad or somehow inferior for being unfamiliar with any information related to topics that we often cover here.
I worry that as the movement has grown and taken shape, that some folks start to get left behind because they just recently began interested to dig deeper or can't make the time commitment to learn about the many rabbit holes we frequent.
Especially in the most recent cycle, much has been made of the "low information, low propensity" voter and Trump's tremendous persuasion power over that group.
While its not exactly a 1:1 match, similar individuals read and sometimes engage with us here on GAW - or at least that is my observation.
Personally I want to be very careful to not discourage such people by coming across as a "know it all" or making them feel inferior in any way, if it becomes apparent that they aren't knowledgeable on the subjects familiar to many of us veterans of GAW.
Unfortunately a great majority of the ignorant and pig headed vitriol we see users sometimes engaged in during arguments stems from information learned via legacy media.
The MSM opinion factory seems to lend itself to providing answers that make people close-minded and overly self assured, for whatever reason.
I think we have to resist urges to showboat or come across as having all the answers.... However, in some cases lack of knowledge can seem like hostility when it isn't meant that way, and we should be careful to recognize one from another, when possible.
Case and point: Benz has a tremendous wealth of a priori knowledge on all of this stuff that would put nearly any of ours to shame - and he is NEVER elitist about it, which is to his great credit and a chief reason WHY he is able to so succinctly pass on simply incredible knowledge and discoveries such as this!
I would point to his approach when relating back information and his overall tone and style as a great example of how to connect with others at all different levels of knowledge. He never sounds cynical towards his audience or as though he puts himself above them. Its something that I want to continue to strive for in my own communication, and it really serves to remove ego and hostility from the scenario and make the information sharing paramount - which is the goal (or should be!), ultimately.
That's it, nothing to debate about really, sorry! Just a small point I wanted to bloviate about, is all. Hah! 🫠 Godspeed.
Even aware old bull frogs can pop a new tidbit with review. I hadn't connected he / she / it Chelsea Manning until your review.
One of the issues that stayed with was this:
Read that again and again. Why? Because it showcases personal bias. And for a man who is deep into digging into rabbit holes, even for him this is a strong element.
It also means something else. We all have an idea about how the world works. That idea is usually not only false, but it is totally not workable and functional. On top of this, as another layer of filter, come our convictions and ideals, desires, longing.
This shapes our perspective and thus the answer to the question: this or that.
Thanks for sharing OP.
The "fucking British" comes to mind here...
Layers of history messed up by British boarding school traditions.