I don't think so, but of course I can't know for sure. In this case I'm sticking to the drops and lets see what happens. I can still use him as an anon litmus test :p
Oh gotcha. Thought maybe Assange but dyslexia took over haha.
Just curious though, why is Jones lumped into that group for (the posters above) if you know? Seems he’s never been shy about attacking the CIA. If he’s a CIA or Mossad psyop it sure seems to have backfired royally. I likely wouldn’t be here today if not for Jones and I’m guessing I’m far from the only person who can say that.
If you read the drops you'd know but basically he's a controlled opposition clown who's job it is to make us look stupid and insane and gatekeep and spread disinfo as well, on behalf of the CIA and Mossad, and I see scant amount of evidence that he's been flipped, at best he's been reduced to a useful idiot but even that is doubtful to me
With all due respect, reading the drops doesn’t exactly clear anything up when they actually say “disinformation is necessary.” The drops themselves actually reveal very little. They encourage research and above all, critical thinking, but they’re hardly a reliable thesaurus on who’s who and what their roles really are. I don’t think there’s a lack of evidence justifying your position on Jones, but even when Trump speaks we have to read between the lines sometimes so personally, I don’t care who someone really works for. If they say something true I appreciate it, and Alex woke me up to a hell of a lot of truth.
Q was explicit on AJ. Job is to take a real psyop like Sandy Hook and mix it with enough Jewish Space Lasers and gay frogs so that you can't talk about it with normies. Q used AJ as an example of disinfo agents. Yeah, a lot of people following truth ended up with AJ for a while. That's his job, to keep you there.
I think he may have been freed since then (divorce, big asset loss), but no way to tell.
To the contrary, AJ introduced me to truth. Thanks, Mossad. You played yourselves. Nobody who finds AJ gets captured the way you just framed it. You can’t get people to open their minds like that and then cage them. If that was in fact their plan, it was ill-informed.
Q pretty explicitly pegged Snowden as a traitor who was trying to sabotage the NSA's monitoring of deep state actors on behalf of the CIA. Likewise, Q explicitly called AJ a Mossad controlled op. Disinfo is necessary = tossing out bogus "it's happening ____!" when in fact it was not habbening, causing the deep state to over-react and show their hand, burn ammo, etc.
Exposing false patriots was not covered under disinfo necessary, unless you can show me someone Q called out that turned out to be ourguy.
Poso, Cernovich, AJ, Snowden, Jack Dorsey, Comey, and on and on. At the very best, some of them could have been pressured into acting on behalf of the patriots, and others could have had their puppet strings cut and didn't start out as traitors. I leave room for that but for someone like AJ or Snowden, I mean I've got the biggest grains of salt you can buy for any of their moves in this chess game.
You say he woke you up, great, but consider that was his job, only to siphon you into a crazy kennel in some corner of the game board. Would you still have warm fuzzies?
AJ was allowed to operate and flourish for decades while Bill Cooper got raided and executed right after he accurately predicted 9/11. Go see what Bill had to say about AJ long before Q.
AJ woke me, too, but I soon dumped him because I couldn't stand the pretend anger outbursts and shouting. Regardless of the sometimes useful information, I couldn't bear to listen and watch.
I’m ok. Again, it might seem like Q was super clear to you, but I still remember “trust Wray, trust x, y, and z.” Now I’m still waiting on those assurances to pan out and I’m still open to it, but Q is hardly straightforward and transparent in those posts on matters like that. Which frankly, is why I appreciate them so much. Take them too much at face value and you end up with egg on your face. As they’re written they force critical thinking. Maybe all of it’s true, but not yet, maybe some of it was deliberately untrue, and always will be, by design. Whatever the breakdown on that is, I’m not worried about it. But I always worry when I see someone as sure as themselves on matters like this as you seem to be. I try to avoid that myself. I’ll take your strong opinion on it under advisement though. Can’t hurt to consider.
Super fascinating and illuminating. Even though I’ve watched the Q explainer video many times, and even though it says right there that “the military decided it made sense to have their own intelligence agency and formed the NSA” somehow it never clicked until watching this that:
White hats = military intelligence = NSA
Black hats = “civilian” (globalist) intelligence = CIA
It’s comforting to be able to point to the actual white hats (NSA), and black hats (CIA), much in the same way we’ve always been able to point at Democrats and Republicans (even though doing so wasn’t nearly as helpful, as so many Reps were bought and paid for by the same people the Dems were working for). It explains how Trump managed to rise to power and hang onto it despite the CIA so obviously being against him. How he always seemed to be protected and proved right, etc.
It’s highly illuminating.
I live in Utah. Very close to a massive NSA installation. That always made me uneasy, likely because I fell for the Snowden psyop. I don’t know why it took this video to make all of that fully click but I’m glad it finally did.
It’s also super helpful to understand why things have moved so slowly—why we haven’t just gone out and arrested all these monsters yet: because NSA surveillance is done without warrants, so what they find via that means is inadmissible in court. But they can use that INTELLIGENCE to lay traps and know what’s going to happen and move the plan forward regardless.
Yeah, plus the fact that BH includes any corruptible person: business, politics, academia, criminals ... and military, with a secure recruitment for outsiders. And they've been setting it up for over a century. Thank God for Q, and Trump.
I use Snowden and AJ as field tests to see who's who on this board 😉
You think AJ may have been freed since Trump's first term? I think so, but the actual truth is mostly unknowable imo.
I don't think so, but of course I can't know for sure. In this case I'm sticking to the drops and lets see what happens. I can still use him as an anon litmus test :p
King is a great resource.
Who’s AJ?
Alex Jones.
Oh gotcha. Thought maybe Assange but dyslexia took over haha.
Just curious though, why is Jones lumped into that group for (the posters above) if you know? Seems he’s never been shy about attacking the CIA. If he’s a CIA or Mossad psyop it sure seems to have backfired royally. I likely wouldn’t be here today if not for Jones and I’m guessing I’m far from the only person who can say that.
If you read the drops you'd know but basically he's a controlled opposition clown who's job it is to make us look stupid and insane and gatekeep and spread disinfo as well, on behalf of the CIA and Mossad, and I see scant amount of evidence that he's been flipped, at best he's been reduced to a useful idiot but even that is doubtful to me
With all due respect, reading the drops doesn’t exactly clear anything up when they actually say “disinformation is necessary.” The drops themselves actually reveal very little. They encourage research and above all, critical thinking, but they’re hardly a reliable thesaurus on who’s who and what their roles really are. I don’t think there’s a lack of evidence justifying your position on Jones, but even when Trump speaks we have to read between the lines sometimes so personally, I don’t care who someone really works for. If they say something true I appreciate it, and Alex woke me up to a hell of a lot of truth.
Q was explicit on AJ. Job is to take a real psyop like Sandy Hook and mix it with enough Jewish Space Lasers and gay frogs so that you can't talk about it with normies. Q used AJ as an example of disinfo agents. Yeah, a lot of people following truth ended up with AJ for a while. That's his job, to keep you there.
I think he may have been freed since then (divorce, big asset loss), but no way to tell.
To the contrary, AJ introduced me to truth. Thanks, Mossad. You played yourselves. Nobody who finds AJ gets captured the way you just framed it. You can’t get people to open their minds like that and then cage them. If that was in fact their plan, it was ill-informed.
Q pretty explicitly pegged Snowden as a traitor who was trying to sabotage the NSA's monitoring of deep state actors on behalf of the CIA. Likewise, Q explicitly called AJ a Mossad controlled op. Disinfo is necessary = tossing out bogus "it's happening ____!" when in fact it was not habbening, causing the deep state to over-react and show their hand, burn ammo, etc.
Exposing false patriots was not covered under disinfo necessary, unless you can show me someone Q called out that turned out to be ourguy.
Poso, Cernovich, AJ, Snowden, Jack Dorsey, Comey, and on and on. At the very best, some of them could have been pressured into acting on behalf of the patriots, and others could have had their puppet strings cut and didn't start out as traitors. I leave room for that but for someone like AJ or Snowden, I mean I've got the biggest grains of salt you can buy for any of their moves in this chess game.
You say he woke you up, great, but consider that was his job, only to siphon you into a crazy kennel in some corner of the game board. Would you still have warm fuzzies?
AJ was allowed to operate and flourish for decades while Bill Cooper got raided and executed right after he accurately predicted 9/11. Go see what Bill had to say about AJ long before Q.
AJ woke me, too, but I soon dumped him because I couldn't stand the pretend anger outbursts and shouting. Regardless of the sometimes useful information, I couldn't bear to listen and watch.
I’m ok. Again, it might seem like Q was super clear to you, but I still remember “trust Wray, trust x, y, and z.” Now I’m still waiting on those assurances to pan out and I’m still open to it, but Q is hardly straightforward and transparent in those posts on matters like that. Which frankly, is why I appreciate them so much. Take them too much at face value and you end up with egg on your face. As they’re written they force critical thinking. Maybe all of it’s true, but not yet, maybe some of it was deliberately untrue, and always will be, by design. Whatever the breakdown on that is, I’m not worried about it. But I always worry when I see someone as sure as themselves on matters like this as you seem to be. I try to avoid that myself. I’ll take your strong opinion on it under advisement though. Can’t hurt to consider.
Starts at 2:20. Good watch.
Super fascinating and illuminating. Even though I’ve watched the Q explainer video many times, and even though it says right there that “the military decided it made sense to have their own intelligence agency and formed the NSA” somehow it never clicked until watching this that:
White hats = military intelligence = NSA
Black hats = “civilian” (globalist) intelligence = CIA
It’s comforting to be able to point to the actual white hats (NSA), and black hats (CIA), much in the same way we’ve always been able to point at Democrats and Republicans (even though doing so wasn’t nearly as helpful, as so many Reps were bought and paid for by the same people the Dems were working for). It explains how Trump managed to rise to power and hang onto it despite the CIA so obviously being against him. How he always seemed to be protected and proved right, etc.
It’s highly illuminating.
I live in Utah. Very close to a massive NSA installation. That always made me uneasy, likely because I fell for the Snowden psyop. I don’t know why it took this video to make all of that fully click but I’m glad it finally did.
It’s also super helpful to understand why things have moved so slowly—why we haven’t just gone out and arrested all these monsters yet: because NSA surveillance is done without warrants, so what they find via that means is inadmissible in court. But they can use that INTELLIGENCE to lay traps and know what’s going to happen and move the plan forward regardless.
Brilliant. Great video.
Yeah, plus the fact that BH includes any corruptible person: business, politics, academia, criminals ... and military, with a secure recruitment for outsiders. And they've been setting it up for over a century. Thank God for Q, and Trump.