Frens and fellow Anons...
This is the first time I've spent more than five minutes writing a post in quite a while due to some things going on in my personal life. I hope you guys have all been doing well.
As we can all tell, whoever is controlling the DS Shills has the pedal to the metal and the NOS button set to 'Go Baby!'
Firstly, I used to lament how many of the GAW posts here are links to Twitter (X).
Upon further reflection, I think there's a decent likelihood the white hats engineered/helped Elon take over Twitter.
Therefore it is a military tool of sorts in the 5Gen warfare, and a very efficient way for us to share info with each other.
That said, the SHILLS are coming out of the woodwork everywhere lately.
"Be careful who you follow" has never been more relevant than it is lately.
So what is to be done?
The purpose of this post is to set a sort of framework to identify Fake MAGA SHILLS and PAYtriots.
A broader consensus on who is who would benefit GAW greatly.
*Influencers & politicians. Bad, extreme, stupid, or 'out there' opinions doesn't necessarily denote them as a shills. If only it were that easy.
So then what does?
I'll use Nick Fuentes as an example.
I've been on the fence about him for a while.
In an interview he was asked what his main priority was and when he answered "America" his body language did not agree with him.
Tonight I posted a video of him at the J6 rally pulling a Ray Epps; using a bullhorn to incite the crowd to do bad things. Boggles my mind how I didn't see this long ago.
And while Patriotic grandmas and grandpas were getting arrested left and right the past few years, Nick Fuentes and Ray Epps mysteriously went untouched!
That is an absolute qualifier: ClownShill! 💯
Another Shill qualifier IMO is an influencer who is hard-core pro-Israel.
Politicians could be another story. Let me explain...
Unless it can be reasonably argued that they are acting out a part in the movie. Ex. Lindsay Graham... I personally don't like him, but he was a rabid attack-dog defending justice Kavanaugh during his confirmation and Trump golfs with him regularly and continually supports him. Maybe he's playing a role. The same goes for Ted Cruz. Again, I don't like him, but I have a feeling some key politicians are playing this role of continuing their support for Israel because Israel cannot be made to feel 100% cornered politically until the exact right time.
"How do you capture a very dangerous animal"...
Yeah. Timing is everything on that.
But social media influencers are different story:
Clandestine @WarClandestine has come out as hard-core team Zion. Quite disappointing.
So the following are, IMO, some pretty decent, fair, Shill indicators:
A Once-in-a-blue-moon semi-pro-Israel comment MIGHT not necessarily qualify (old religious habits die hard)...
BUT if they are Shilling for Zion REGULARLY on social media...
(at this stage) they are either hopelessly retarded OR a Fake MAGA Shill. It's pointless to trust either.
"If a blind man follows another blind man, they will both fall into a pit." ~Jesus
If they GO HARD against Q... SHILL 💯.
If they are against deporting illegal aliens, they are almost certainly a Fake MAGA Shill 💯.
If they think a 30-06 struck Charlie Kirk in the neck...
they are either retarded or a Fake MAGA Shill.
If they think Thomas Crooks "acted alone"...
Retarded or a Fake MAGA Shill.
If they think the 2020 election wasn't rigged…
Retarded or a Fake MAGA Shill.
If they regularly parrot that the Covid vaccine was 100% safe and effective...
Retarded or a Fake MAGA Shill.
If they are telling you Trump is a pedophile on the Epstein list and that's why it hasn't been released... Retarded or a Fake MAGA Shill.
Amid information warfare, trusting a Fake MAGA Shill is just as foolish as trusting a retard.
The only difference is one can't help that they were likely born that fucked up.
On influencers, politicians, etc. giving reasonable public criticism to Trump, I do NOT think that is a guaranteed Shill marker.
Remember, Elon Musk (briefly) went really hard AF against Trump last summer (re: Epstein files) but IMO he is 100% on Trump's side.
Kayfabe.
I'm pretty sure 95% of us also trust Tucker Carlson, who also has offered up some mild, and not unreasonable, criticisms not even of Trump per se, but rather decisions mainly around attacking Iran, threatening Venezuela, etc. He's extremely against foreign entanglements. Understandable.
Also, a lot of people are very disappointed that the Epstein list has still not come out and they are using that frustration to "call out" Trump. Because most of these people have never heard of Q, and have no clue that there is any type of PLAN, I can understand that.
So with that being said, I think "reasonable" criticisms of Trump, Bondi, Kash Patel, etc. are NOT necessarily Shill markers by themselves, particularly when those criticisms pertain to government transparency, not wanting to go to WAR, or support foreign wars (Ukraine/Israel/Iran) etc.
Criticism does NOT mean they wouldn't vote for Trump again.
I think the argument could be made that Trump himself NEEDS and wants public "criticisms" from his base for political optics (ex. "hey listen my base really wants/demands ABCXYZ, etc.").
The bottom line is there are MAGA influencers out there that you may vehemently disagree with, but that doesn't make them a Shill.
On the flipside, there are MAGA influencers out there that nearly all of us would agree with most of the time, but who are indeed SHILLS.
I'm not sure how many people will see this. I meant to get it out earlier but it ended up taking me a few hours to put together.
What do you guys think?
Any other qualifiers/disqualifiers?
WWG1WGA Frens!!!
Terrific post, JohnTitor17 -- All of your examples make good sense to me, except Clandestine. I get his emails and seldom feel they're off the mark, but then again I don't see much (any?) Zion-shilling in the emails. (I don't have an X account, so I don't follow his day-to-day output on that platform).
In any case, I don't take anyone (including myself) as a prophet or as being right all the time.
I tend to give shills the benefit of the doubt for a few exchanges, but only if they're not obviously malicious. Soon enough it becomes clear that they're either hiding their malice or they just aren't going to let go of whatever they've been brainwashed into. Or something else is going on, and I don't have the time to sus it out.
There is a simple way to know if someone is a shill or not.
Let me build you a visual first: All of us stuck in a pit of mud for decades, suffocating, with no chance of being rescued. Along comes Trump and starts dragging us out of the pit. No one before him even attempted to do it, let alone succeed to this extent.
Ask yourself this: Does your favourite influencer acknowledge this fact and are thankful for it? Or do they keep focusing on the people still in the pit?
This figurative example will tell you where each person falls.
u/#howl
See I have to disagree with this kind of simplistic reduction. Even those of us hardcore haters of Zionists have come to realise that Trump is using Zionists in a very strategic manner to take down the Soros faction, and this means its inevitable to talk about this stuff, which is what Clandestine does. Misconstruing it as "shill" is a very easy way to mislead ourselves.
Okay, I will play along. Let me add to this list:
If they think Charlie Kirk "assassination" was not a sting operation, they are retarded or Fake MAGA shill.
If they think Trump or Erika was behind this "assassination", they are retarded or Fake MAGA shill.
If they think Kash Patel can simply release information on ongoing operations, including this sting operation, they are retarded or Fake MAGA.
If they think that every time Kash cannot release sensitive information it makes him a Zionist puppet, they are retarded or Fake MAGA shill.
But honestly, I dont think we should judge people based on which side of the issue they are sitting on, but rather how they got there
It's not merely that Clandestine supports Zionism. Is that he's attacking any and all other MAGA influencers ad hominem if they say anything about what the Zionists have done to our country, or their grotesque influence in our politics.
(Fake) MAGA attacking MAGA is one of the biggest red flags of all.
Do you agree or disagree?
Agreed on Clandestine. He gets butt hurt and bans anyone that slightly disagrees with his posts. I'm banned from commenting on his posts and don't even know why. Shill alarm bells go off for him.
Nick Fuentes gives me an uncomfortable feeling and I can't explain it so with you on Nick.
Just checked Clandestine's feed and figured out why you are angry with Nick Fuentes! Apparently he is not going along with the Candace et al anymore, kek!
Maybe Nick got "read in" because he doesn't have a British handler like Candace? Or maybe he is going to meander around a little more on his own? Whatever be the case, its quite interesting times for people very invested in these influencers.
Luckily, we can just enjoy from the sidelines!
I gotta see some sauce to know what you are talking about. From what I have seen, he criticises Candace etc, not because she hates Israel, but because she is divding MAGA. Please link to me other instances you are referring to.
I agree with you BB. I think JT's list is highly reductive and is indicative of a divisive mindset that is not helpful. We need to be able to have discussions about these topics without labeling anyone who doesn't 100% agree with our perspectives as "shills" just because someone might believe that Charlie Kirk could have been shot with a 3006 round or just because someone supports zionism. These topics should rise and fall on their own merits through public discourse, not through a blanket rejection of divergent viewpoints and perpetuation of echo chambers.
Your final point is definitely an important distinction. I would say the real qualifier for what makes someone a shill is intent, not position. Intent is extremely hard to prove.
So, where's the list? I was looking for a list. I don't pay any attention to these people anyway, so I need a list so I can tell folks (my wife) who to ignore...
TOTALLY AGREE, We need Discernment, not judgement and the former takes time and puts emotion to the side. Also we change our views and so do others. I listened to Tuckers interview with Milo yesterday. Brilliant!. I actually saw Milo in Australia many years ago and like Tucker saw a very intelligent , insightful man behind all the gay fakery. It was awesome to hear about his personal growth. Some people change. BUT not Trump. He is following his mission and sometimes Kayfabe is necessary, so I do not waste my time listening to his opposition . And I believe Trump is often inflammatory to bring attention and light to certain issues and people. EFFECTIVE!