Ive watched candace for a long time. She is quite talented and quick tongued. But I have always felt there was something disingenuous about here going way back.
She is so smug and talks with such glee about destroying TPUSA. Clear signs of narcissism and ego. I doubt she ever really left the left and was an undercover sleeper to destroy the right when the time was right. And here we are. :/
There are a lot of folks on the right who are disappointed with Trump v2.0 so far. Candace Owens didn’t do that. We have done a lot of holding the line over the years, and have reached a point where some of us are beginning to question whether Trump still has the people’s best interests in mind. He seems to be aligned with some shady characters, and it could possibly be under a threat related to the bullet that grazed his ear. Or this could all be part of the complex narrative that has to play out in order to maintain the promise of “Israel for last.” In the long run, we are blind to the chess board—instead of black and white chess pieces, there are shades of gray.
It’s possible that you’re right about Candace’s motives, but from what I can tell, she’s basically throwing political alignments out the window and trying to get to the bottom of an official story that makes no sense, that appeals to our biases regarding trans furries and Antifa types carving gay little phrases into bullet casings. At the end of the day, a .30-06 would have obliterated Charlie’s neck and head. What we got was some tall tale about Charlie basically having a superhuman spinal column that stopped a bullet that ought to have traveled through him and kept going. They called it a miracle, which used our faith in God against us. That’s pretty evil, if you ask me. So we’re left with a lot of questions— if a .30-06 didn’t kill Charlie, then what did? If a .30-06 didn’t kill Charlie, then what was Tyler Robinson’s role, other than being an obvious patsy? Why does there seem to be a lot of foreknowledge about this assassination? Why did Bibi react so quickly to the news of Charlie’s death, and instantly announce that Israel had no involvement? Why are so many people associated with TPUSA making claims about that day that are verifiably false, when all you need to do is examine some footage from that day?
In the end, all we can do is go down the rabbit holes that make sense with our own gut feelings. We may never get a definitive explanation. Just look at 9/11 or the Vegas shooting for similar examples of official stories that defy logic, that have obvious players who stand to gain something from hiding the truth. It’s a dead end every time.
That’s fine, you can believe as you wish. From my perspective, seeing Trump boast certain accomplishments, like solving the failed Biden economy while my lying eyes see prices continue to go up rather than down— makes me question Trump. I still support him over the alternative, because let’s face it— the operations required to win an information war would require giving the enemy some belief that they are winning. At the same time, I’m not fully convinced that the information war isn’t against the American people. I think of things with multiple frameworks rather than just through the Q “white hats / black hats” lens, because it’s entirely possible that the actual truth (the only thing I care about achieving) might not be what we expect. No hate or downvoting— I just feel in my gut that it’s wise to avoid assumptions. And yes, that includes Candace Owens. We get backstabbed almost daily by people we thought we could trust.
I dont disagree. I just get bad vibes from her personally, especially when I look in her eyes as she talks about this stuff. You can see the dollar signs and the ego that is fed by the nonstop attention. She also seems vitriolic on a personal level toward Charlie, so I wouldnt bet against the rumours she was in love with him and got rejected being true either and now she's a woman scorned lashing out at his lover and company.
And whatever the case, she is disintegrating what is left of the base regardless of motives.
I don't trust candy. Used to listen to her but she does lots of click bait and attention grabbing shit even if it's not legit...
I'll wait and see how this pans out
Ive watched candace for a long time. She is quite talented and quick tongued. But I have always felt there was something disingenuous about here going way back.
Kanye even eluded to that. He felt like he was being used by her. He stayed friendly but distance himself from her.
She is so smug and talks with such glee about destroying TPUSA. Clear signs of narcissism and ego. I doubt she ever really left the left and was an undercover sleeper to destroy the right when the time was right. And here we are. :/
There are a lot of folks on the right who are disappointed with Trump v2.0 so far. Candace Owens didn’t do that. We have done a lot of holding the line over the years, and have reached a point where some of us are beginning to question whether Trump still has the people’s best interests in mind. He seems to be aligned with some shady characters, and it could possibly be under a threat related to the bullet that grazed his ear. Or this could all be part of the complex narrative that has to play out in order to maintain the promise of “Israel for last.” In the long run, we are blind to the chess board—instead of black and white chess pieces, there are shades of gray.
It’s possible that you’re right about Candace’s motives, but from what I can tell, she’s basically throwing political alignments out the window and trying to get to the bottom of an official story that makes no sense, that appeals to our biases regarding trans furries and Antifa types carving gay little phrases into bullet casings. At the end of the day, a .30-06 would have obliterated Charlie’s neck and head. What we got was some tall tale about Charlie basically having a superhuman spinal column that stopped a bullet that ought to have traveled through him and kept going. They called it a miracle, which used our faith in God against us. That’s pretty evil, if you ask me. So we’re left with a lot of questions— if a .30-06 didn’t kill Charlie, then what did? If a .30-06 didn’t kill Charlie, then what was Tyler Robinson’s role, other than being an obvious patsy? Why does there seem to be a lot of foreknowledge about this assassination? Why did Bibi react so quickly to the news of Charlie’s death, and instantly announce that Israel had no involvement? Why are so many people associated with TPUSA making claims about that day that are verifiably false, when all you need to do is examine some footage from that day?
In the end, all we can do is go down the rabbit holes that make sense with our own gut feelings. We may never get a definitive explanation. Just look at 9/11 or the Vegas shooting for similar examples of official stories that defy logic, that have obvious players who stand to gain something from hiding the truth. It’s a dead end every time.
Upvoted brother. Great comment.
I don't buy this at all. Regular folks are just glad Obiden is gone. Awake patriots are mostly ignoring the efforts at sowing division.
That’s fine, you can believe as you wish. From my perspective, seeing Trump boast certain accomplishments, like solving the failed Biden economy while my lying eyes see prices continue to go up rather than down— makes me question Trump. I still support him over the alternative, because let’s face it— the operations required to win an information war would require giving the enemy some belief that they are winning. At the same time, I’m not fully convinced that the information war isn’t against the American people. I think of things with multiple frameworks rather than just through the Q “white hats / black hats” lens, because it’s entirely possible that the actual truth (the only thing I care about achieving) might not be what we expect. No hate or downvoting— I just feel in my gut that it’s wise to avoid assumptions. And yes, that includes Candace Owens. We get backstabbed almost daily by people we thought we could trust.
I dont disagree. I just get bad vibes from her personally, especially when I look in her eyes as she talks about this stuff. You can see the dollar signs and the ego that is fed by the nonstop attention. She also seems vitriolic on a personal level toward Charlie, so I wouldnt bet against the rumours she was in love with him and got rejected being true either and now she's a woman scorned lashing out at his lover and company.
And whatever the case, she is disintegrating what is left of the base regardless of motives.
You don’t need to listen to Candace to think this whole thing is a crock of shit.