Problem is not enough people will go against it. When someone does they hammer them down with massive consequences to show people "don't pay your tax we'll spend x1000 times more than you should have paid to put you in jail!" it's all about keeping the masses in check and afraid of consequences.
We shall overcome. The propagation of the truth about the tax is sufficient even if we don't have that many willing to act on their knowledge. But the Revolutionary War was won with 3% of the populace active and we have more than that.
Don't stop filing if there is a credible allegation against you that you earned income. Either pay the tax on income you earned or demonstrate that the correct amount of income was insufficient to owe tax, but don't leave a credible allegation unanswered, because that would leave you open to others assessing you instead of you assessing yourself.
People are free to determine the point at which peaceful civil disobedience is justified. The nature of the income tax scheme is designed so that peaceful civil disobedience is usually not "justified" (in the sense that the tax is avoidable and "voluntary"), but the path of avoidance is deliberately so hidden so that the tax appears to be de facto tyrannical (in the sense that people fear it), leading many people to fall for the many strawmen and think they're being noble and revolutionary when they're just falling for something the law didn't say.
Jesus said to give taxes to whom they were due. That implies that you don't give taxes to whom they are not due. Withholding money that you can prove you don't owe is virtuous, but withholding money when the evidence is stacked against you for a slam-dunk proof that you do owe it is falling right into the scheme. It is necessary to prove that you don't owe it and to prove wrong those who state facts that logically would allow the inference that you do owe it.
Think about it. If you lived in a society where most of your interactions was interpreted by the state as proof of your treason, you'd want to document in most interactions a contemporaneous proof that they were not treason, for your own conscience's sake and especially if courts were still working. In this society (hint), when an information return is filed against you it often testifies that you earned income that flows into taxable income. If you earned taxable income, you should by law pay the tax, but if you didn't then you should document and prove that you didn't and that the allegation was false.
What? A three-letter government agency cheating the American citizens! The question is, how many three letter government agencies are cheating the American citizens.
Short of working under the table, how does one start a job without filling out a w-2? Pretty sure most companies wont let you work without tax documents being on file.
It was Irwin Schiff and he was using the false argument "all income tax is corporate tax" to distract people from the real operation of excise tax upon evadable activities.
The Browns fell for one of the many strawmen narratives the IRS puts out to distract people from the real operation of excise tax upon evadable activities. Then they openly let people in and out of their home while they were under siege, which is what got them arrested by moles. The IRS never goes after those who follow the law of excise scrupulously.
Problem is not enough people will go against it. When someone does they hammer them down with massive consequences to show people "don't pay your tax we'll spend x1000 times more than you should have paid to put you in jail!" it's all about keeping the masses in check and afraid of consequences.
Don't worry.
As I've been saying on GAW since the day I got here, and long before Trump ever said it:
"In the future, there will be sales tax. But there WILL. BE. NO. income or property taxes. Source: White Hat time traveler John Titor in 2001."
Trump is going to "put an end to the endless" taxation.
We shall overcome. The propagation of the truth about the tax is sufficient even if we don't have that many willing to act on their knowledge. But the Revolutionary War was won with 3% of the populace active and we have more than that.
I stopped paying and filing. Digital 1776! Check out RugPull Radio on Rumble!
Don't stop filing if there is a credible allegation against you that you earned income. Either pay the tax on income you earned or demonstrate that the correct amount of income was insufficient to owe tax, but don't leave a credible allegation unanswered, because that would leave you open to others assessing you instead of you assessing yourself.
There would be no America if our founders and revolutionary soldiers took this advice. My advice is find some grit and stop funding evil.
People are free to determine the point at which peaceful civil disobedience is justified. The nature of the income tax scheme is designed so that peaceful civil disobedience is usually not "justified" (in the sense that the tax is avoidable and "voluntary"), but the path of avoidance is deliberately so hidden so that the tax appears to be de facto tyrannical (in the sense that people fear it), leading many people to fall for the many strawmen and think they're being noble and revolutionary when they're just falling for something the law didn't say.
Jesus said to give taxes to whom they were due. That implies that you don't give taxes to whom they are not due. Withholding money that you can prove you don't owe is virtuous, but withholding money when the evidence is stacked against you for a slam-dunk proof that you do owe it is falling right into the scheme. It is necessary to prove that you don't owe it and to prove wrong those who state facts that logically would allow the inference that you do owe it.
Think about it. If you lived in a society where most of your interactions was interpreted by the state as proof of your treason, you'd want to document in most interactions a contemporaneous proof that they were not treason, for your own conscience's sake and especially if courts were still working. In this society (hint), when an information return is filed against you it often testifies that you earned income that flows into taxable income. If you earned taxable income, you should by law pay the tax, but if you didn't then you should document and prove that you didn't and that the allegation was false.
Programs such as FHA loans are directly tied to your tax return. Be sure you know the ramifications of your actions
What? A three-letter government agency cheating the American citizens! The question is, how many three letter government agencies are cheating the American citizens.
That's the thing about guns. it's a deterrent. They have guns.
Short of working under the table, how does one start a job without filling out a w-2? Pretty sure most companies wont let you work without tax documents being on file.
Fill out the W2, but just checkthe box to claim an exemption from Ferderal taxes
no blinking
I think Peter Schiff argued this and went to jail.
It was Irwin Schiff and he was using the false argument "all income tax is corporate tax" to distract people from the real operation of excise tax upon evadable activities.
That's right, thanks. I thought I might have gotten the first name wrong.
people get jailed for tax evasion, so find the statute THERE
or let them go free
"Voluntary Compliance"
Is anyone familiar with Legal Fockery University who says they have a class that teaches how to exit the IRS?
The Browns fell for one of the many strawmen narratives the IRS puts out to distract people from the real operation of excise tax upon evadable activities. Then they openly let people in and out of their home while they were under siege, which is what got them arrested by moles. The IRS never goes after those who follow the law of excise scrupulously.