The DNI doesn’t run elections.
Even if Tulsi opened an intelligence review, the DNI has no authority to mandate paper ballots, limit voting to Election Day, or change how states run elections. That power lives with the states and Congress.
Elections can’t just be “suspended.”
There is no mechanism for the executive branch to pause midterms. That would require congressional action and likely constitutional changes, not an intelligence investigation.
Nothing official backs this up.
If something this big were happening, we’d see executive orders, DOJ filings, court actions, or congressional moves. None of that exists right now.
This isn’t new territory.
Electronic voting has already been litigated extensively since 2020, and many states already use paper ballots or paper audit trails.
I’m not saying election integrity doesn’t matter — it absolutely does. I’m just saying this claim jumps way ahead of what any agency actually has the legal power to do.
It also highlights a significant issue that's been called out multiple times here recently.
Someone takes old information, shakes out the mothballs and dust bunnies, slaps a 🚨“BREAKING”🚨 label on it, and suddenly it’s treated like brand-new policy. Everyone gets spun up, declares a massive “WIN!!!” starts talking about tribunals, hangings, and traitors getting what’s coming.
Then… nothing happens.
Because it was never real in the first place.
A few weeks pass. Reality intrudes. It quietly gets memory-holed.
Eight months later the exact same claim pops back up, dusted off, reposted, and the whole thing starts again.
Rinse. Repeat.
If we want to be taken seriously, we have to stop reacting to recycled hype and start asking one simple question every time: what actually changed today and who exactly was arrested?
Edited to add that last bit in bold there thanks to u/CMAnon pointing out that I wasn't asking everything that needed to be asked.
Totally not trying to bust your balls on this, but...how much due diligence do you put into verifying things you post? On average? This is really something I wonder about, seeing how things like this are a daily occurrence. Multiple times a day, at that. Obviously I don't think you do this any more than anyone else. I'm not trying to suggest that you, personally, are responsible for all of it.
I appreciate the work that you put into creating posts for all of us. It's something I can't really do myself. Either by the time I find something interesting enough to post, 20 other people have already posted about it. So no real reason for me to do it. But....come on guys (not just you, brain_dead). This is an elite research board. There should be at least the most basic fact checking before passing stuff along.
It's gotten to the point that as soon as I see 🚨“BREAKING”🚨, I automatically start the BS detector. 🤷♀️
One of the most important thing for me is, if the board ha not seen it, then I post. I went thru the board to make sure it has not been posted. Sometimes I posted thing that's 4 years ago but I do tell you.
How far back? Do you go through months and months and months (or even years) to make sure that "BREAKING!" news isn't actually months or even years old?
Thats not very efficient.
Edited to add: I'm wondering if we might have our signals crossed here.
I'm not criticizing you because I think you've posted something that's already been plastered all over the board recently. I brought up that bit about things I would be interested in posting myself already being posted about 20 times by the time I was able to create a post about it as a way to explain why I, personally, don't create new posts here. Because by the time I've read about it, many other people here have already posted about it that day.
I wasn't trying to say that there were 20 other posts with this "breaking news" about Gabbard already posted today.
I hope this clears that up, and not just made it more confusing.
I'm 188% behind brain_deads efforts. But I feel the need to point it out in my case I'm just a "B" student, and you're picking on an anon called "brain_dead". So in a way there was pre-disclosure 🤔😒😉😄😄
My comments were about what the post claimed, not solely what's said during the video itself. The only thing I mentioned that's specific to the actual video is its age.
I didn't realize I had to point that out explicitly. Apparently I overestimated everyone's ability to figure that out for themselves. Totally my bad.
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with your comment in regards to my pointing out that this is an elite research board. So rather than me trying to decode whatever it is you're trying to say there, maybe you could be so kind to clarify it a bit?
Yes, I get that everyone here aren't elite researchers. That's why I took the time to try to figure out why we're having so many of these "Breaking News!" posts of things months or even years old. Because obviously everyone isn't operating on the same level.
And then I gave clear, simple examples of how someone could be a better researcher. Such as doing a basic search with the "news" toggle on your favorite search engine. Or how to quickly find relevant YouTube videos. I just saved U/brain_dead untold hours of scrolling through hundreds and hundreds of posts here (thousands and thousands if we assume they do this for every single post they make), looking to see if the same "Breaking News!" had already been submitted or not (never mind that this doesn't check the validity of the content of the post and that it's still virtually useless because it's just checking the last few weeks, so it just means they're reposting stuff older than 3 weeks old).
And people seem to be really offended over that. So....🤷♀️.
Yesterday it was revealed that Arizona removed 220,000 illegal voters from their voter rolls. If all states had just 220,000 illegal voters, that is 11 million illegal voters in the 2020 election. Add about the same number for illegal fake ballots and you have 22 million fake votes. Now add another 11 million for the votes FLIPPED to Biden gives you 33 million fake votes. Subtract the 33 million form Biden's final count and it will give you about 48 million people that actually voted for Biden! Trump got 75 or so million votes. THAT is the Steal of Century!
Tulsi has bigger balls than most republicans. She'd make a great first female US president. Especialpy since leftists like Hillary, Kamala, Big Mike, and The View would hate it.
It's the insertion of fake ballots that drives me crazy. Voting for people that don't exist, don't show up, are illegal, or are dead. That is as big of an issue as the machines themselves.
A few things worth keeping straight here:
This is from at least 8 months ago, so hardly "breaking". Here's the same YouTube clip from 8 months ago: https://youtube.com/shorts/SQPedWdeijw?si=QJMn1bU24py0bNjw
The DNI doesn’t run elections. Even if Tulsi opened an intelligence review, the DNI has no authority to mandate paper ballots, limit voting to Election Day, or change how states run elections. That power lives with the states and Congress.
Elections can’t just be “suspended.” There is no mechanism for the executive branch to pause midterms. That would require congressional action and likely constitutional changes, not an intelligence investigation.
Nothing official backs this up. If something this big were happening, we’d see executive orders, DOJ filings, court actions, or congressional moves. None of that exists right now.
This isn’t new territory. Electronic voting has already been litigated extensively since 2020, and many states already use paper ballots or paper audit trails.
I’m not saying election integrity doesn’t matter — it absolutely does. I’m just saying this claim jumps way ahead of what any agency actually has the legal power to do.
It also highlights a significant issue that's been called out multiple times here recently.
Someone takes old information, shakes out the mothballs and dust bunnies, slaps a 🚨“BREAKING”🚨 label on it, and suddenly it’s treated like brand-new policy. Everyone gets spun up, declares a massive “WIN!!!” starts talking about tribunals, hangings, and traitors getting what’s coming.
Then… nothing happens. Because it was never real in the first place.
A few weeks pass. Reality intrudes. It quietly gets memory-holed. Eight months later the exact same claim pops back up, dusted off, reposted, and the whole thing starts again.
Rinse. Repeat.
If we want to be taken seriously, we have to stop reacting to recycled hype and start asking one simple question every time: what actually changed today and who exactly was arrested?
Edited to add that last bit in bold there thanks to u/CMAnon pointing out that I wasn't asking everything that needed to be asked.
Oops
Totally not trying to bust your balls on this, but...how much due diligence do you put into verifying things you post? On average? This is really something I wonder about, seeing how things like this are a daily occurrence. Multiple times a day, at that. Obviously I don't think you do this any more than anyone else. I'm not trying to suggest that you, personally, are responsible for all of it.
I appreciate the work that you put into creating posts for all of us. It's something I can't really do myself. Either by the time I find something interesting enough to post, 20 other people have already posted about it. So no real reason for me to do it. But....come on guys (not just you, brain_dead). This is an elite research board. There should be at least the most basic fact checking before passing stuff along.
It's gotten to the point that as soon as I see 🚨“BREAKING”🚨, I automatically start the BS detector. 🤷♀️
One of the most important thing for me is, if the board ha not seen it, then I post. I went thru the board to make sure it has not been posted. Sometimes I posted thing that's 4 years ago but I do tell you.
How can you tell if it's been posted about before or not, though?
You check the board.
How far back? Do you go through months and months and months (or even years) to make sure that "BREAKING!" news isn't actually months or even years old?
Thats not very efficient.
Edited to add: I'm wondering if we might have our signals crossed here.
I'm not criticizing you because I think you've posted something that's already been plastered all over the board recently. I brought up that bit about things I would be interested in posting myself already being posted about 20 times by the time I was able to create a post about it as a way to explain why I, personally, don't create new posts here. Because by the time I've read about it, many other people here have already posted about it that day.
I wasn't trying to say that there were 20 other posts with this "breaking news" about Gabbard already posted today.
I hope this clears that up, and not just made it more confusing.
I usually look several weeks back. I have not seen this.
I'm 188% behind brain_deads efforts. But I feel the need to point it out in my case I'm just a "B" student, and you're picking on an anon called "brain_dead". So in a way there was pre-disclosure 🤔😒😉😄😄
FIRST OFF....it's an INVESTIGATION by an AGENCY that does INVESTIGATION NATIONALLY....you might wanna start there you seemed to really miss that PART.
I watched the video, the GOAL was paper ballots. There is a PROCCESS to get there, that is all that was said.
As for ELITE RESEARCH BOARD.....it's more than the average bear
My comments were about what the post claimed, not solely what's said during the video itself. The only thing I mentioned that's specific to the actual video is its age.
I didn't realize I had to point that out explicitly. Apparently I overestimated everyone's ability to figure that out for themselves. Totally my bad.
I'm not sure where you're trying to go with your comment in regards to my pointing out that this is an elite research board. So rather than me trying to decode whatever it is you're trying to say there, maybe you could be so kind to clarify it a bit?
Some Elite, but some just TRYING the best they know how....as the man said, YOU ARE THE NEWS, you also are the DECODER
Yes, I get that everyone here aren't elite researchers. That's why I took the time to try to figure out why we're having so many of these "Breaking News!" posts of things months or even years old. Because obviously everyone isn't operating on the same level.
And then I gave clear, simple examples of how someone could be a better researcher. Such as doing a basic search with the "news" toggle on your favorite search engine. Or how to quickly find relevant YouTube videos. I just saved U/brain_dead untold hours of scrolling through hundreds and hundreds of posts here (thousands and thousands if we assume they do this for every single post they make), looking to see if the same "Breaking News!" had already been submitted or not (never mind that this doesn't check the validity of the content of the post and that it's still virtually useless because it's just checking the last few weeks, so it just means they're reposting stuff older than 3 weeks old).
And people seem to be really offended over that. So....🤷♀️.
the second half of your last question is missing. "What actually changed today and who exactly was arrested?"
You're welcome.
Thanks! That's absolutely better!
Thanks for the clarification.
Yesterday it was revealed that Arizona removed 220,000 illegal voters from their voter rolls. If all states had just 220,000 illegal voters, that is 11 million illegal voters in the 2020 election. Add about the same number for illegal fake ballots and you have 22 million fake votes. Now add another 11 million for the votes FLIPPED to Biden gives you 33 million fake votes. Subtract the 33 million form Biden's final count and it will give you about 48 million people that actually voted for Biden! Trump got 75 or so million votes. THAT is the Steal of Century!
Bet you some have lot more.
Tulsi has bigger balls than most republicans. She'd make a great first female US president. Especialpy since leftists like Hillary, Kamala, Big Mike, and The View would hate it.
Oh, I can see and hear them turning into banshees.
I said they removed but i was incorrect. They have not been removed yet. https://x.com/FinalTelegraph/status/2000123348391449006
Thanks. It needs to go. They all need to go.
Electronic voting as in Dominion machines and altering votes and submitting fake ones?
It's the insertion of fake ballots that drives me crazy. Voting for people that don't exist, don't show up, are illegal, or are dead. That is as big of an issue as the machines themselves.
I think so.
You believe since day 1? You are more skeptical than a brain-dead. LOL
They are powerful. Yes.