Sorry man I don’t think you know what “under color of law” means. It’s not a legal protection of any kind. It’s when any person acts as the state in an official seeming capacity without duly appointed authority to take away the rights of citizens and citing a non-law to do so. For example: when police officers were running around during Covid arresting people for disobeying health department edicts. The health department has no authority to arrest citizens for refusing to obey such edicts, police officers had no right to enforce such edicts with threats of arrest or actual arrest, and judges had no right to rule against anyone who was not subject to such edicts. In that case, the health departments, police, and judges, were all acting as if people were breaking laws when no such laws existed and thus, were acting under color of law. All of them can be prosecuted for this under federal law. You can’t enforce a non-law and take away people’s rights for disobeying said non-law. THAT’s what “under color of law” means. It’s not some kind of legal shield from prosecution, it’s actually a listed crime that they can be prosecuted for under 18 USC 242.
Oh boy. That didn’t help things. What does RICO have to do with this? Do you not know what THAT is either? Are you just tossing out legal jargon willy nilly hoping it lands? You know these words have definitions, right? RICO has nothing to do with Presidents.
No. Just Presidents and former presidents.
Sorry man I don’t think you know what “under color of law” means. It’s not a legal protection of any kind. It’s when any person acts as the state in an official seeming capacity without duly appointed authority to take away the rights of citizens and citing a non-law to do so. For example: when police officers were running around during Covid arresting people for disobeying health department edicts. The health department has no authority to arrest citizens for refusing to obey such edicts, police officers had no right to enforce such edicts with threats of arrest or actual arrest, and judges had no right to rule against anyone who was not subject to such edicts. In that case, the health departments, police, and judges, were all acting as if people were breaking laws when no such laws existed and thus, were acting under color of law. All of them can be prosecuted for this under federal law. You can’t enforce a non-law and take away people’s rights for disobeying said non-law. THAT’s what “under color of law” means. It’s not some kind of legal shield from prosecution, it’s actually a listed crime that they can be prosecuted for under 18 USC 242.
I did not use color of law as protection. The law is the law. And there are special laws for presidents just not Rico.
Oh boy. That didn’t help things. What does RICO have to do with this? Do you not know what THAT is either? Are you just tossing out legal jargon willy nilly hoping it lands? You know these words have definitions, right? RICO has nothing to do with Presidents.