It’s not real, it’s ai. If you look up close the words on his shirt is a jarbled mess, the cars fender/front isn’t quite right and the lady doing the makeup her hand is slightly wrong.
Yeah, sure. They did a make-up routine with media cameras surrounding them, so that no one would ever know that they were doing a make-up routine.
Someone just quoted to me
The problem with being a hammer is that everything after a while starts to look like a nail.
Pausing means, er, he forgot the script? People do not pause for any other reasons? Then, are there no other plausible reasons?
If someone was shot (and any type of head would could easily cause a massive amount of bleeding. Then, do you think that a person's cognitive ability might not be impaired?
I wonder how he managed to get all his makeup done, in the midst of media and cameras all around him (note all teh tripods), THEN inject himself into the situation. Amazing skills...
FWIW, disclaimer. None of us can know exactly what information comes to us is real and isn't real. The only things most of us know about this whole affair are conveyed to us via the Media (both MSM and non-MSM) the authorities.
That said, I have a very close family member whose house is a stone's throw from Bondi Beach sand (and I've been to that location myself several times), and while I haven't asked him yet about what his family knows or witnessed, I'm NOT skeptical that this incident didn't happen or that crisis actors were involved.
Note also a 'false flag' does not mean that the event is simply staged (not real). It means that some sort of operation is executed (real or not) that lays blame on a specific target in a psychological war operation.
I found the comments under the X post informative. Seems like more than just a few are calling this out as AI bullsh*t.
In my opinion, people posting like this on X are a blight on our work and mission. I see no real issue with questioning, doing a rational analysis, weighing various theories against available evidence, but this account is NOT interested in that (as far as I can tell). It's about clicks, about garnering influence and virality ("engagement"), often about making bucks, and sometimes simply injecting disinformation into the information sphere.
Already, MSM media is calling out "despicable AI fakes images being spread".
Re: Daily Telegraph, Australia-based News Corp paper
Problem, Reaction, Solution in action, people.
Promote fake AI shit >>>> Give fodder to the Mainstream control apparatus to denounce it and disclaim it >>>>> get governments to pass laws doing everything from banning social media to imposing Digital ID on media use, etc, while discrediting legitimate conspiracy analysts and creating fodder for discerning truth seekers to go off on a tangent.
If you think the truth sphere is NOT riddled with agents aiding and abetting the control and censor agenda, you are NOT paying attention.
Conclusion: compared to MSM, apply MORE scrutiny and MORE discernment when dealing with narratives that play directly into you own biases, especially when promoted by loud noises, loud claims, highly provocative media methods.
This sort of X post is such a low ball attempt at hitting real anons. I hope that people aren't falling for it.
My opinion
Was the Bondi incident a false flag (ie. orchestrated by puppet masters in order to promote specific agendas, ie digital ID, further gun restrictions, polarization in the society, etc, etc) or was it what it appears to be, simply a terrorist attack by a trained radicalized Islamist cell?
These two options are not mutually exclusive
But the concept and idea behind this X post is ludicrous. Little bit hard to stage a FAKE shooting and mass murder in the presence of 2000+ individuals at one of Australia's most famous and iconic beach spots, in mid-summer at the height of the beach season.
Not to mention doing <ahem> the hollywood makeup in the presence of multiple media outlets and cameras.
Flimsy isn't the word for this narrative. Stoopid is more like it.
Excellent and on point. I like your analysis and appreciate it. Thank you. Would be interested to know what your family member down under has to say about what happened.
We are getting blasted with info from all angles. Now more than ever we must be more discerning and not jump to immediate conclusions about what may or may not have happened - exploring all angles. This is information warfare, and as you already stated so well, there are those that will try to promote disinformation that conforms with certain biases that are known among groups. Especially when someone has a large footprint. This community as well is not immune from such attacks and I have no doubt some are on this forum. Sometimes all that is needed is a little common sense. Occam's razor.
That first photo from agentity. What's wrong with the rear right tire? Totally Sus.
The second one: Besides the change of pants, did he change his shoes as well?
Not sure what the third link was in response to.
Just a few seconds of scrutiny is enough to debunk this stuff circulating around. Lots of hammers out there looking for nails.
I'm leaning towards probably not. I mostly posted it for the absurdity of a guy getting shot in the head with a bolt action rifle but then he's giving interviews… The bandage isn't seeping blood. He would be on his way to the hospital. Plus he forgot his damn story for a second. None of the body language jived...
The nice clean bandage over his head tells me all I need to know. A wound continues to seep, drain, bleed. "Medics" bandaged the head wound, but didn't attempt to wash some of his face of 'dried blood'. Calling bullshit.
I would say probably not... Just the whole set up at the beginning. Guy takes a headshot and then is fine giving interview???
Clearly forgets his lines for a second.
If that face painting photo is real then all hell should break loose
It’s not real, it’s ai. If you look up close the words on his shirt is a jarbled mess, the cars fender/front isn’t quite right and the lady doing the makeup her hand is slightly wrong.
Yeah, sure. They did a make-up routine with media cameras surrounding them, so that no one would ever know that they were doing a make-up routine.
Someone just quoted to me
Pausing means, er, he forgot the script? People do not pause for any other reasons? Then, are there no other plausible reasons?
If someone was shot (and any type of head would could easily cause a massive amount of bleeding. Then, do you think that a person's cognitive ability might not be impaired?
I wonder how he managed to get all his makeup done, in the midst of media and cameras all around him (note all teh tripods), THEN inject himself into the situation. Amazing skills...
FWIW, disclaimer. None of us can know exactly what information comes to us is real and isn't real. The only things most of us know about this whole affair are conveyed to us via the Media (both MSM and non-MSM) the authorities.
That said, I have a very close family member whose house is a stone's throw from Bondi Beach sand (and I've been to that location myself several times), and while I haven't asked him yet about what his family knows or witnessed, I'm NOT skeptical that this incident didn't happen or that crisis actors were involved.
Note also a 'false flag' does not mean that the event is simply staged (not real). It means that some sort of operation is executed (real or not) that lays blame on a specific target in a psychological war operation.
I found the comments under the X post informative. Seems like more than just a few are calling this out as AI bullsh*t.
In my opinion, people posting like this on X are a blight on our work and mission. I see no real issue with questioning, doing a rational analysis, weighing various theories against available evidence, but this account is NOT interested in that (as far as I can tell). It's about clicks, about garnering influence and virality ("engagement"), often about making bucks, and sometimes simply injecting disinformation into the information sphere.
Already, MSM media is calling out "despicable AI fakes images being spread".
Re: Daily Telegraph, Australia-based News Corp paper
Problem, Reaction, Solution in action, people.
Promote fake AI shit >>>> Give fodder to the Mainstream control apparatus to denounce it and disclaim it >>>>> get governments to pass laws doing everything from banning social media to imposing Digital ID on media use, etc, while discrediting legitimate conspiracy analysts and creating fodder for discerning truth seekers to go off on a tangent.
If you think the truth sphere is NOT riddled with agents aiding and abetting the control and censor agenda, you are NOT paying attention.
Conclusion: compared to MSM, apply MORE scrutiny and MORE discernment when dealing with narratives that play directly into you own biases, especially when promoted by loud noises, loud claims, highly provocative media methods.
This sort of X post is such a low ball attempt at hitting real anons. I hope that people aren't falling for it.
My opinion
Was the Bondi incident a false flag (ie. orchestrated by puppet masters in order to promote specific agendas, ie digital ID, further gun restrictions, polarization in the society, etc, etc) or was it what it appears to be, simply a terrorist attack by a trained radicalized Islamist cell?
These two options are not mutually exclusive
But the concept and idea behind this X post is ludicrous. Little bit hard to stage a FAKE shooting and mass murder in the presence of 2000+ individuals at one of Australia's most famous and iconic beach spots, in mid-summer at the height of the beach season.
Not to mention doing <ahem> the hollywood makeup in the presence of multiple media outlets and cameras.
Flimsy isn't the word for this narrative. Stoopid is more like it.
In my opinion.
See also:
Comments
https://x.com/agentityHQ/status/2000882397961978310
https://x.com/Fractal_Incite/status/2000818374683820343
https://x.com/jopawo/status/2000993152665063838
Excellent and on point. I like your analysis and appreciate it. Thank you. Would be interested to know what your family member down under has to say about what happened.
We are getting blasted with info from all angles. Now more than ever we must be more discerning and not jump to immediate conclusions about what may or may not have happened - exploring all angles. This is information warfare, and as you already stated so well, there are those that will try to promote disinformation that conforms with certain biases that are known among groups. Especially when someone has a large footprint. This community as well is not immune from such attacks and I have no doubt some are on this forum. Sometimes all that is needed is a little common sense. Occam's razor.
That first photo from agentity. What's wrong with the rear right tire? Totally Sus.
The second one: Besides the change of pants, did he change his shoes as well?
Not sure what the third link was in response to.
Just a few seconds of scrutiny is enough to debunk this stuff circulating around. Lots of hammers out there looking for nails.
What happened to wtc 7? Muzzies in planes?
Did 6 million Jews die in the Holocaust?
Excuse me if a little common sense goes a long ways.
I'm leaning towards probably not. I mostly posted it for the absurdity of a guy getting shot in the head with a bolt action rifle but then he's giving interviews… The bandage isn't seeping blood. He would be on his way to the hospital. Plus he forgot his damn story for a second. None of the body language jived...
Kenny goes to my gym 💪
AI Generated guys. Do your damn homework.
Obviously the shirt stains do not match and the text on his shirt is illegible.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-fake-image-not-032628348.html
The nice clean bandage over his head tells me all I need to know. A wound continues to seep, drain, bleed. "Medics" bandaged the head wound, but didn't attempt to wash some of his face of 'dried blood'. Calling bullshit.
wtf?! is the last picture real?
I would say probably not... Just the whole set up at the beginning. Guy takes a headshot and then is fine giving interview???
Clearly forgets his lines for a second.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/fact-check-fake-image-not-032628348.html