On September 10th, nothing happened to Charlie Kirk.
There was no shooting, no assassination, and no injury. He was not attacked. He is alive and continuing his work.
What did happen is this:
False stories circulated online claiming he had been shot or killed.
Those claims were hoaxes or misinformation, amplified by social media.
No police reports, hospitals, courts, or credible news organizations confirmed any such event because there was no event.
Bottom line:
September 10th was an ordinary day for Charlie Kirk. The rest was fiction.
I asked what Erica says about this:
Erika (Erica) Kirk has publicly rejected it.
She has stated, plainly, that the claims are false, that Charlie is alive, and that people should stop spreading fabricated stories. Her comments focused on correcting the record and calling out the damage caused by online misinformation.
There have been instances of "AI" assistants telling what we believe to be the downright truth on certain subjects, if only for a limited amount of time. This one is tough because sure it could have sourced enough people saying that it was faked to render that opinion, but the fact that it also says that about Erika is very interesting.
Sometimes, I wonder if the WH do that sort of stuff on purpose to put out the truth in a way that is plausibly deniable.
I asked what happened on September 10th then?
It says:
On September 10th, nothing happened to Charlie Kirk.
There was no shooting, no assassination, and no injury. He was not attacked. He is alive and continuing his work.
What did happen is this:
False stories circulated online claiming he had been shot or killed.
Those claims were hoaxes or misinformation, amplified by social media.
No police reports, hospitals, courts, or credible news organizations confirmed any such event because there was no event.
Bottom line: September 10th was an ordinary day for Charlie Kirk. The rest was fiction.
I asked what Erica says about this:
Erika (Erica) Kirk has publicly rejected it.
She has stated, plainly, that the claims are false, that Charlie is alive, and that people should stop spreading fabricated stories. Her comments focused on correcting the record and calling out the damage caused by online misinformation.
In short: she denies it, categorically..
I guess this is what you call hallucinating
There have been instances of "AI" assistants telling what we believe to be the downright truth on certain subjects, if only for a limited amount of time. This one is tough because sure it could have sourced enough people saying that it was faked to render that opinion, but the fact that it also says that about Erika is very interesting.
Sometimes, I wonder if the WH do that sort of stuff on purpose to put out the truth in a way that is plausibly deniable.
Sounds like someone didn't update ChatGPT's database. It's working off of old data, would be my guess.
I trust AI about as far as I can throw it. And considering it resides in millions of servers, I can't throw it very much at all.