The Secret Plot to Destroy Charlie Kirk's Legacy: FAILED
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (14)
sorted by:
In this episode, Barbara Boyd provides an in-depth analysis of Vice President JD Vance's speech at the Amfest Conference of Turning Point USA. She highlights the intense psychological warfare operations aimed at dismantling the coalition that elected Donald Trump, the exploitation of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, and the implications of Hollywood's involvement in intelligence operations against Trump. Boyd also delves into the shocking assassination of Charlie Kirk and the strategic responses to ongoing psy-war tactics leading up to the midterms. Subscribe to learn more about these critical issues.
I am subscribed to Promethean action's YouTube channel. They present an interesting pov. just in this video alone however, they have a few blind spots (who doesn't?). Like agreeing with no perceivable pushback or doubts whatsoever that Tyler Robinson is Charlie Kirk's killer; that Charlie Kirk was assassinated; that Jeffrey Epstein is dead/killed/suicide(d); that q-anon is a thing. I guess no human organisation is a complete and infallible source of info.
She took a cheap shot at Q. There were people in the Q movement that took the pedophile ring thing to the extreme but that wasn’t isolated to Q followers and didn’t originate with Q. Most of the people that I see online that are so concerned about Epstein and his files have nothing to do with Q and their interest doesn’t seem to go beyond the pedo stuff and how they can tie that to Trump.
I have followed Q from the very beginning and I agree with Barbara about Epstein and his exploits and have stated it a few times on this sub. And that is that the children trafficking thing was overblown as a smokescreen to cover up Epstein’s real actions over the years and to tie Trump to this pedo psyop. I would bet that I shared this opinion before Barbara. And I am a Q follower.
My point being, I am not sure why she singled out “Qanon”. Out of 5000 Q drops only around 30 mentioned Epstein. And only a few of those mentioned his sex abuse.
Q was about exposing the deep state. Epstein was a big part of the deep state.
To my frens. Don’t fall for all the black pills that are being thrown around by the DS. They are really scared of TP. They thought they could render a crippling blow by taking Charlie out, but the movement just got stronger, politically and spiritually. And Trump is not shy about telling us when someone on the team is screwing up. So flush the black pills and get ready to rock out in 2026. It is going to be fun and a challenge to keep up.
What the hell did any of that fucking mean? What are you asking from us? Why did you even bother saying that? You read like a bot or a plant sent here with a few key words memorized to toss them all together in a word salad in an attempt to sway us. You can't seriously be a real human being with no agenda with that bullshit. Who are you people?
It doesn’t seem so secret, “ with so many people on this very board jumping on the destroy Charlie’s legacy bandwagon. Not to mention the many attacking his widow at every turn.
Sorry Doug, but the widow has done herself in by her own behavior.
I was a big fan of Charlie, and knew very little about his wife, but since his death, all of these videos of the two of them have been released to promote her, including old beauty pageant stuff, her super-cute music video and photos of her adoring Charlie.
HOWEVER, internet sleuths have uncovered other bits of her past life. We learn about her suspicious 'ROMANIAN ANGELS' child adoption scheme that she allegedly formed when she was only 17!?? This 'adoption agency' shipped young children 'for adoption' to I-s-ra-el and the UK to wealthy clients. Hmmm. Later, it was shut down due to allegations of child trafficking. Hmmm.
On camera during an interview years ago, she claimed she hadn't dated for the entire 5 years she lived in New York. But then we see she was on a reality TV show about dating, and accepts a date from one of the guys. We see her sultry modeling photos with wine or champagne in hand, as she professes on camera that she never drinks alcohol.
We see lovely engagement photos with a previous fiancée and wonder, "Did she marry the guy or not?" Then we see a photo of her with another boyfriend, Cabot Phillips who is the son of a wealthy super church pastor and who used to be friends and play basketball with Charlie years ago!
This handsome single guy, Cabot Phillips will NOW BE JOINING TPUSA as a Charlie stand-in! We learn that Cabot has been working with a pro-Is-re-al publication. He's also posted a photo of himself showing the word 'p-i-z-z-a' tattooed on the inside of his bottom lip. WHO COULD HAVE SCRIPTED THIS??
And we see an old photo of Erika being named part of the 'Arizona I-s-ra-el Public Affairs' group. In that photo, the president of the country of I-s-ra-el's eligible bachelor's son, Yair Netanyahu is standing with his arm around her shoulder.
Then we have this week's confession from her cousin, that Erika's family is 'half-J-wish'.
I could go on...
I reported Doug in another thread earlier today and got a reply from the mods that he's been dealt with. I didn't hear back from Doug though, so I don't know if he was temp banned, permabanned, or if his comment only was deleted and he was allowed to apologize and remain but I think it's extremely obvious, if you look through his replies and in which threads he frequents, what kind of poster he is. If you can read through his stuff and not detect the angle and could honestly think he's a genuine poster and not a paid narrative pusher I would be very surprised. Take a few minutes if you have time and take a look. Nobody should take this poster seriously if you ask me.
Is this what is meant by attacking his grieving widow at every turn? Hogwash. Straight up facts from hard working investigative journalists.
This is utter dog shit
Have an upvote. It's nice to see there are still some real people giving real opinions on this topic.
Yup, this has seemed a total psyop to me and I will continue to say so. It has caused a LOT of negatives and has people pointing fingers at each other, many even here have become the spiderman meme.
Who cares? That's literally what this site is all about. We question everything. It's what we do. When did all these "we gotta stick together and not let the DS divide us" faggots show up on this site to stifle disucission anyway? Seriously I swear to God I'm spotting you fuckers everywhere the past few days. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Do I have to report all of you or are the mods seeing what I'm seeing too?
General questioning and info dropping, yes. Emotional driven spiderman pointing, no.
I guess I am a stupid person. It seems to me that the logical person to take over Mr. Kirk's legacy would be a person who had an affinity for the audience he was attempting to reach. It would have to be someone intelligent and someone they could identify with -- no disrespect to Mrs. Kirk, but I don't see her as someone with whom the target audience would identify.
Why didn't they approach Mr. Barron Trump? He's the right age, reportedly an extremely intelligent young man, and if he had any interests in politics it would be good experience for him. Also, wouldn't he have more security available to him than any other candidate for such an endeavor? It's just a thought...