So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
Assume you have a child. The child was abducted, perhaps because the child had a social media account and a stalker found them.
The child is found.
Walk me through the thought process where a parent in that situation goes to the evil social media that got their child abducted in the first place, and blabs in non-private settings about their abducted child being saved.
Would you do that? Or would you avoid social media like the plague?
If you hadn't already deleted all social media accounts in that situation, you would be incredibly naive.
Attempting to crowdsource all of GAW to locate such people among trillions of social media accounts, and citing the lack of success in doing so as proof you're correct, is idiotic. Accusing Trump and Q of lying because you can't find any evidence to the contrary is a bad faith argument.
I have two kids and I would tell them both to speak out a la Plauche. I would consider it morally responsible to save other kids. You don't understand how personal this is to some of us
How important?
Important enough to actually require proof?
The fallacy argument is called Appeal to Ignorance. Look it up.
There are 500 million social media messages made per day. Crowdsourcing GAW to help you or the OP to tackle finding proof that your hunch that Trump and Q are lying is the most fucking asinine thing I've ever heard of, pardon my French.
If you actually cared about kids I'm sure there are more productive things you could be doing than crowdsourcing all of GAW to help you prove that Trump and Q liars.
Even if I were to grant that you would be successful and all of GAW ends up hating Trump and Q, the kids are still missing aren't they? Tell me what you accomplished then to save the kids if you're successful in your endeavor.
I no longer trust your intentions. You need to get the fuck off our forum.
Ok bub. checks out your post history
etc. etc. etc.
Is it your forum? If so, why do you have such an apparent problem following forum rules?
The OP is about a decades-old pattern of making big claims about arrests and rescues
Usually, these news stories are based on a DOJ statement making some vague allegations and claims
The news media will fluff the piece up a little, repackage it for a local audience.
While the unmistable pattern of these fake news stories is one issue
the other issue is how these BS stories have never changed, in spite of change in administrations
That you can't give a single actual example of?
That you can't give a single actual example of?
Paraphrased: Trump (who is Q+, who told you about Epstein Island before it was on your radar), is just as bad and corrupt as all the other presidents in regards to children, unable to control his own DOJ after having been POTUS a total of 5 years we know of and probably an extra 4 years in between.
Paraphrased: Q, whos says they have it all, who are famously quoted as saying Crimes against children unite all humanity [cross party lines]?, who said "Chandler = CHILD HANDLER, these people are sick!", is actually ineffective. They have nothing, they have done nothing, they allow their own DOJ to lie about saving children and as such, shouldn't be trusted either.
Why?
Because you imagined there was a database of child exploitation victims that you could just start looking up their photos, home addresses and phone numbers so you can call their parents and ask them if their child was really abducted or not?
And because that doesn't exist, you try to recruit all of GAW to help you on your quest to prove Trump and Q are liars.
Your vague thread serves no purpose other than to create FUD in regards to Trump and Q.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Jeffrey_Doucet
Upon further review… is this story also fake news?
Once upon a time, it was uncommon to have security cameras, smart phones, social media, news crews,
But somehow the news just happened to be recording?
kinda like Butler PA?
I don’t think your brain is working very well right now. If my child went missing, everyone would know. If I found them, everyone would know.
right!
and while not everybody would, behave exactly like you,
enough people would, behave exactly like you…