So, I have been watching a certain kind of news article for many, many years. The news article has a very formulaic template of
“LARGE NUMBER OF PEDOS ARRESTED, LARGE NUMBER OF CHILDREN RESCUED”
idk why these stories caught my attention. maybe it was their compulsive need to “hedge” facts
for example, they might say AT LEAST 152 pedos arrested, and AT LEAST 63 children rescued
what you mean “at least”?
if there was MORE than 152 or 63, then maybe just give us that exact number, instead of implying theres some sort of ambigiuty on basic facts
I was also “concerned” that the authorities seem to sit on these cases for many years, before taking any action, which means to me that “at least” 63 children were being abused daily while the authorites are sipping coffee…
I spent many hours chasing these stories, trying to find any actual evidence that anyone was arrested, or that anyone was rescued
At first, i could NEVER find any supporting evidence, such as the suspects names, mugshots, court dates, convictions, etc
After many posts and comments like the one you are reading now, things started to change….
Now we get a whole page of names and mugshots, but the faces feel like AI, and so do the names.
When you try to follow-up on these names, theres almost nothing out there. No local news etc
So, just recently i had the bright idea to use ChatGPT to make a master list of all these supposed operations, and how they were resolved
ChatGPT would cite a government claim, like a DOJ press release, as actual evidence
When i pressed harder, ChatGPT conceeded there was no real evidence outside of vague claims made by the government
ChatGPT also mentioned how a lot of times, these long running “fed” operations were actually just a summary of what local law enforcement had been doing over the last X years
Local cops bust a local pimp, the feds take credit, and lump the local bust in with
“operation look busy because the boss is coming”
i also asked chatGPT to produce any evidence that any of these supposedly rescue children actually exist.
ChatGPT gave me all kinds of reasons why they couldn’t give me any evidence and none of them were very convincing at all
Out of the thousands of children supposedly rescued, none of them have made a social media page or started a foundation or organization or whatever to publicize what happened to them and to publicize the problems and maybe try to do something about it
Mark my word: because I will be referencing this post in the near future…
After this post goes out, a person will emerge and claim that they were a victim of child sex trafficking, and that they were rescued during one of these operations. However, if we dig deeper on this person, we will find out they are nothing more than a crisis actor, feeding us another scripted line of bullshit.
My challenge to anyone reading this:
Make a mental note to yourself, that next time you hear a big story about a bunch of pedophiles being arrested in children being rescued, you’re gonna check it out a little deeper
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your hometown
You’re gonna find out if any of those people were from your home state
You’re gonna find out if any of these people have mug shots or their names
You’re gonna find out if there’s any court dates
And you’re gonna find out if there’s any convictions
And I think what you will find very quickly, is that these stories are very long on big claims, and very short on hard evidence
Good work, and the following is in no way meant as disrespect.
However (as I prepare for a deluge of down votes), one wonders if jumping down yet another rabbit hole with the same questioning style will accomplish anything.
Once again, we're focusing on the what happened and not the why. Just like jfk, 911, Sandy Hook, Las Vegas, The Kirk assassination.... The list goes on and on. In each case, it's an endless circle jerk, constructed completely by the perpetrators, to entangle the populace in a never ending tug of war.
If everything you are leaning towards shows nothing is real and everything is fake, I suggest skipping the part of proving so. It's a completely futile effort. Instead, focus on the why.
Why would these stories be put out there with no actual truth to them?
Why wouldn't supposed enemies of Trump seize on this huge lie?
Why does falsifying these reports help those facilitating them?
Once we narrow down the field on these questions, your list of what happened will be whittled down and then you will be able to get closer to the truth.
I wonder if they are trying to pacify us to keep us believing that something is being done. But why? So we won’t rise up and demand details or what. This is a great post to bring this out in the open.
thanks for noticing the bigger implications
We’d believe it all if the storm already hit and we saw perps being arrested in high high places. So everything now is 85% “it’s happening” and 15% “what if we are being fucking worked.”
Well if they were going to use all smoke and mirrors to pacify us, then either the Q movement is a party to that scam, or it's not and Q has nothing to do with Trump.
Both choices beg the question "then why are we here?"
This seems like a good call.
And I only bring it up as someone who in effect wasted many many years of my life on Jfk. I read the book "High Treason" (https://a.co/d/0l4SMN6) about the jfk assassination when I was 8 years old. I spent decades getting to the bottom of it.
But where am I because of all that? Still arguing with people who believe the official narrative.
I think everyone should go down at least one BIG rabbit hole, that way they flesh out all the nuance and details.
Then once a person has gone down that one rabbit hole, they intuitively know what to look for in the next rabbit hole
So for example, there were a bunch of people who started looking at Sandy Hook school shooting
And then when the Boston Marathon bombing happened, that group of people looking at Sandy Hook, segued into the Boston narratives, and introduced the world to the concept of “crisis actors”
And once you understand crisis actors in one context,
Then you are able to understand crisis actors in other contexts
For example,
The secret service agents at Butler PA
The people surrounding Charlie Kirk,
like Erika Kirk
Even Ukrainian Zelensky is a crisis actor