"Part of the reason that fire was never fully extinguished was that the state of California had a policy on parkland."
"NOT allowing heavy fire suppression equipment into areas that were considered sensitive, either because they had rare plants or because they possibly had cultural resources."
"If you read the documents, these policies, which were crafted late 2024, said you could not suppress fire in the state park, which is right up against Pacific Palisades, unless you had an archaeologist present to tell you where you could and could not put out the fire."
So wouldn't the fires destroy the plant?
There you go again, using that awful, evil Logic!
You know right?
"Part of the reason that fire was never fully extinguished was that the state of California had a policy on parkland."
"NOT allowing heavy fire suppression equipment into areas that were considered sensitive, either because they had rare plants or because they possibly had cultural resources."
"If you read the documents, these policies, which were crafted late 2024, said you could not suppress fire in the state park, which is right up against Pacific Palisades, unless you had an archaeologist present to tell you where you could and could not put out the fire."
https://nitter.net/i/status/2008886254352371775
How does that even make sense? It's an obviously lame excuse. Their policy is to destroy the state.
In California....:
Just to name a very few
California logic on full display.
Huntington Beach blocked a fully-funded desalinization plant due to it's disturbance on ocean bacteria's ecosystem.
funny monkey claps intensify
Those must be some rare fire-proof plants.