For all the smart people reading this thread: If we take these special numbers the people keep talking about 174hz, 285hz, 396hz, 417hz, 528hz, 639hz, 741hz, 852hz, 963hz, (also known as ancient solfeggio pitches) we can see that they are just a pattern of nine numbers with each digit incremented up by one each time. Now we know that these numbers have a positive effect on the human body. There are many studies that prove this and they are easy to look up. Now the real interesting part is that if these numbers have a positive effect then the only possible explanation is that the measurement of the second (as in one sixtieth of a minute) is not arbitrary. Logically that is the only possible explanation. Think about it, 528 cycles per what? 741 cycles per what? The second has to be based on some fundamental. It isn't just something that someone made up out of thin air. Is your mind blown yet?
OK I'm not one of the smart people........I'm missing something.....so it's "cycles per second" right? And you are asking what is a "second" based on? What fundamental?
So what is a "second" based on? At this point I don't know.
The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.
This definition was adopted in 1967 by the International System of Units (SI).
BUT that is just a construct devised to consistently measure the second using the constant of that particular cesium isotope. It doesn't define the second any more than a precise ruler defines the inch or the foot. Saying an atomic clock invented the second is about as true as saying my tape measure invented the inch.
Well sure! But I'm not saying "an atomic clock invented the second". I'm just giving you a textbook definition of a "second". What else is there? Do you know of a better way? Or standard? Not being argumentative I just don't know.
For all the smart people reading this thread: If we take these special numbers the people keep talking about 174hz, 285hz, 396hz, 417hz, 528hz, 639hz, 741hz, 852hz, 963hz, (also known as ancient solfeggio pitches) we can see that they are just a pattern of nine numbers with each digit incremented up by one each time. Now we know that these numbers have a positive effect on the human body. There are many studies that prove this and they are easy to look up. Now the real interesting part is that if these numbers have a positive effect then the only possible explanation is that the measurement of the second (as in one sixtieth of a minute) is not arbitrary. Logically that is the only possible explanation. Think about it, 528 cycles per what? 741 cycles per what? The second has to be based on some fundamental. It isn't just something that someone made up out of thin air. Is your mind blown yet?
And , using numerology…where each digit is added and then added again to produce a single digit…the pattern is 3,6,9,3,6,9
174 Hz=1+7+4=12. 1+2=3
You are BRILLIANT Panda!
Thanks, I try to practice how to think more than I practice what to think. I usually get more beneficial results that way.
Good thinking Panda!
OK I'm not one of the smart people........I'm missing something.....so it's "cycles per second" right? And you are asking what is a "second" based on? What fundamental?
So what is a "second" based on? At this point I don't know.
Yes, exactly.
Mind blown, yes. Again.
The second is defined as:
The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium-133 atom.
This definition was adopted in 1967 by the International System of Units (SI).
BUT that is just a construct devised to consistently measure the second using the constant of that particular cesium isotope. It doesn't define the second any more than a precise ruler defines the inch or the foot. Saying an atomic clock invented the second is about as true as saying my tape measure invented the inch.
Well sure! But I'm not saying "an atomic clock invented the second". I'm just giving you a textbook definition of a "second". What else is there? Do you know of a better way? Or standard? Not being argumentative I just don't know.