47
posted ago by penisse ago by penisse +47 / -0

👉🏻 https://x.com/samahoole/status/2011047926110290055

👉🏻 https://nitter.net/samahoole/status/2011047926110290055

Medieval Forest Laws, England, 1066-1217:

Hunting deer: Death penalty by hanging Hunting boar: Blinding and exile
Hunting rabbits: Hand amputation

Not because of conservation. The deer population was massive.

Because meat access = power.

Control the meat = control the population.

Peasants could watch deer destroy their crops and be executed for killing one to feed starving children.

Meanwhile, nobility ate venison multiple times weekly.

The result was predictable:

Noble class: Tall, strong, healthy, lived to 60-70 Peasant class: Short, weak, sick, died at 40-50

700 years of this. Seven centuries of restricting meat to elites while forcing peasants onto grain.

The peasants got shorter every generation. The nobles stayed tall.

Then agricultural revolution made grain abundant and cheap. Still, meat stayed expensive and restricted.

Now? The restriction is psychological instead of legal.

"Meat causes cancer!" (It doesn't) "Meat destroys the planet!" (It doesn't) "Meat is unethical!" (Compared to what?)

Same control mechanism. Different delivery method.

Keep the masses eating grain. Keep them weak, compliant, sick.

The elites still eat meat. They just don't tell you.