This is pretty well the same impression I got, and I don’t like being told to be quiet, but as explained it was never “this will not be discussed” but more “it’s not the right time to discuss this”, which comes off differently.
“I have this raging case of diarrhea, here are the symptoms, here’s some episodes I’ve had, heres what it got onto and how I cleaned it up, and here’s the rotten stuff that might have caused it.”
Do you discuss this
at your gastroenterologist office
mid-bite at Christmas dinner with your 7 year old niece and aunt
This is a false analogy. You are suggesting the removal of posts that are "off topic." But if the diarrhea was topical it would be a completely different situation. Like, what if that was a symptom of Covid v. 3.0 (Sars was v. 1.0) and not discussing it was essential to the exposure of the evil? Then censoring the important information about diarrhea would be evil and possibly deadly (murderous) on a massive scale.
In this case, we are talking about DEWs. They are topical to Q (clearly). But DEWs have been censored repeatedly with legitimate research and evidence.
I keep trying to help people understand that CENSORSHIP is not the same thing as "disagreeing with," or "thinking we should be focused on something else right now," etc. CENSORSHIP (in this case) IS ELIMINATING TOPICAL INFORMATION FROM INVESTIGATING RESEARCHERS.
I keep saying this, and the proponents of censorship keep ignoring it (this is not the first time this has come up, including with mods). I'm talking about TOPICAL, LEGITIMATE information and discussions, not "stuff that doesn't belong here." Unfortunately, if there is a whimsical power to determine "what is appropriate" it can be abused (we see that regarding censorship all the time in the news; see "hate speech"). That abuse has happened many, many times here.
The problem though was that C5 pretended to be fully blue-pilled about these topics in private conversation. Although, on the other hand he has no way of knowing for sure who is a shill and who isn't. He wanted to play it safe even though it meant he would alienate all the best researchers on the site by doing so....I brought this up with the mods multiple times. I said something like: How are you not banning flat earth tards/shills but telling everyone DEW's do not exist when it is literally on Lockheed Martin's website?. Then mentioned how most stickies used to get 400 to 500 updoots before mods went full retard. Then again maybe half of those were bots that they had banned during that time....Only the mods really know and they have done an amazing Job in many many ways....If you don't believe me just look at the other .win sites.
TLDR, dunno what to tell you. Only thing I’ve had removed was on “chemtrails”, but which was later allowed, as were DEWs. In both cases, valid research or not, there isn’t exactly a high level of responsive or preventative action that can be taken on either subject, so I’m not sure what the actual impacts are. For whatever it’s worth, there’s also no “free speech” in the military, which is kinda how I see our position, Digital Soldier, nor are the forum mods Congress, nor are they excessively censorial. It’s tended to be pretty clear guardrails set around specific topics from what I’ve seen.
If they start removing actionable research on how to be freer and healthier and more righteous, or of decodes or major habbenings, as opposed to simply being aware of certain things, by all means, hammer that alarm bell, but by what I’ve seen, we’ve lost exponentially more, and much more important work, from disgruntled posters who’ve reacted by fully censoring themselves, voluntarily. 😞
Kek, I get where you are coming from and agree with what you are trying to say but don't forget that the commies/globalists want everyone to "be of one mind" as well. Individual thought is the most important things in the universe.
unfortunately, I don't think get what i'm saying, because it seems you haven't been paying attention to my account.
Revalation 19:11-16
11 Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war.
12 His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself.
13 He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God.
14 And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses.
15 From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written:
King of kings and Lord of lords.
His name is Yeshua. I think Christ the son of God (who I assume you know is alive and aware of everything right now) would want you to call him by his actual name instead of a name that literally translates to hail Zeus (Jesus)
P.S. The choice to love comes from individuals. The philosophy of Collectivism produces no real love. All choices come from the need to conform when individual freedom is not paramount. This is why the USA is has the best form of government ever devised.
This is pretty well the same impression I got, and I don’t like being told to be quiet, but as explained it was never “this will not be discussed” but more “it’s not the right time to discuss this”, which comes off differently.
“I have this raging case of diarrhea, here are the symptoms, here’s some episodes I’ve had, heres what it got onto and how I cleaned it up, and here’s the rotten stuff that might have caused it.”
Do you discuss this
u/StormzAComing
This is a false analogy. You are suggesting the removal of posts that are "off topic." But if the diarrhea was topical it would be a completely different situation. Like, what if that was a symptom of Covid v. 3.0 (Sars was v. 1.0) and not discussing it was essential to the exposure of the evil? Then censoring the important information about diarrhea would be evil and possibly deadly (murderous) on a massive scale.
In this case, we are talking about DEWs. They are topical to Q (clearly). But DEWs have been censored repeatedly with legitimate research and evidence.
I keep trying to help people understand that CENSORSHIP is not the same thing as "disagreeing with," or "thinking we should be focused on something else right now," etc. CENSORSHIP (in this case) IS ELIMINATING TOPICAL INFORMATION FROM INVESTIGATING RESEARCHERS.
I keep saying this, and the proponents of censorship keep ignoring it (this is not the first time this has come up, including with mods). I'm talking about TOPICAL, LEGITIMATE information and discussions, not "stuff that doesn't belong here." Unfortunately, if there is a whimsical power to determine "what is appropriate" it can be abused (we see that regarding censorship all the time in the news; see "hate speech"). That abuse has happened many, many times here.
That is what I'm talking about.
The problem though was that C5 pretended to be fully blue-pilled about these topics in private conversation. Although, on the other hand he has no way of knowing for sure who is a shill and who isn't. He wanted to play it safe even though it meant he would alienate all the best researchers on the site by doing so....I brought this up with the mods multiple times. I said something like: How are you not banning flat earth tards/shills but telling everyone DEW's do not exist when it is literally on Lockheed Martin's website?. Then mentioned how most stickies used to get 400 to 500 updoots before mods went full retard. Then again maybe half of those were bots that they had banned during that time....Only the mods really know and they have done an amazing Job in many many ways....If you don't believe me just look at the other .win sites.
Unfortunately, every case of diarrhea (jet screamers) that I've ever had was always pretty deep. I could only wish that it was topical.
That was disgusting and... topical.
I had a reply written on this but lost it.
TLDR, dunno what to tell you. Only thing I’ve had removed was on “chemtrails”, but which was later allowed, as were DEWs. In both cases, valid research or not, there isn’t exactly a high level of responsive or preventative action that can be taken on either subject, so I’m not sure what the actual impacts are. For whatever it’s worth, there’s also no “free speech” in the military, which is kinda how I see our position, Digital Soldier, nor are the forum mods Congress, nor are they excessively censorial. It’s tended to be pretty clear guardrails set around specific topics from what I’ve seen.
If they start removing actionable research on how to be freer and healthier and more righteous, or of decodes or major habbenings, as opposed to simply being aware of certain things, by all means, hammer that alarm bell, but by what I’ve seen, we’ve lost exponentially more, and much more important work, from disgruntled posters who’ve reacted by fully censoring themselves, voluntarily. 😞
Wow fren really well said and great example..thanks for putting it into better words then I could.
This place has a far greater story then many understand..I'm so excited to watch that story be revealed for all to see. God wins.
Love you fren. Thanks for being such a loving presence in my life
Can we agree to pray on each others words and let the Spirit bring us to one mind??
Kek, I get where you are coming from and agree with what you are trying to say but don't forget that the commies/globalists want everyone to "be of one mind" as well. Individual thought is the most important things in the universe.
I get what u are saying as well.
Let me ask
Who is Jesus Christ to you?
Also love and Jesus are the Most important thing In the universe.
Individual thought is important to a degree. Let him increase and I decrease though is the one mind. Jesus is guiding us all to something
unfortunately, I don't think get what i'm saying, because it seems you haven't been paying attention to my account.
Revalation 19:11-16
11 Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! The one sitting on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war.
12 His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems, and he has a name written that no one knows but himself.
13 He is clothed in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God.
14 And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, were following him on white horses.
15 From his mouth comes a sharp sword with which to strike down the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron. He will tread the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty. 16 On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written:
King of kings and Lord of lords.
His name is Yeshua. I think Christ the son of God (who I assume you know is alive and aware of everything right now) would want you to call him by his actual name instead of a name that literally translates to hail Zeus (Jesus)
P.S. The choice to love comes from individuals. The philosophy of Collectivism produces no real love. All choices come from the need to conform when individual freedom is not paramount. This is why the USA is has the best form of government ever devised.
Was this for me?
Oops sorry fren. On the move and put comment in wrong spot. God bless