These are not RINOs. They are elected officials who betray the Americans they represent by actively engaging in working against the people’s best interest to serve either their own agenda or those of their overlords.
These are traitors to America, there is no better word for it. They are participating in the destruction of America.
Grassley also. He blocked many of Trumps appointments, stands in the way of FAIR elections, and is blocking the vote to override of the filibuster rule!
Both have posted on X from their official accounts that they support it. Both Rand Paul and Chuck Grassley have put out statements supporting the SAVE Act.
Rand Paul opposes the SAVE Act because he views it as an overreach of federal power into state-managed elections, despite supporting the goal of verifying voter citizenship.
While Paul agrees that only U.S. citizens should vote, he has expressed constitutional concerns about the federal government mandating how states verify voter eligibility. He argues that election administration should remain primarily under state control, consistent with his long-standing libertarian principles and skepticism of federal mandates.
Additionally, Paul has raised concerns about privacy and data security, particularly regarding the bill’s requirement for states to share voter information with the Department of Homeland Security. He worries this could lead to federal overreach and misuse of personal data.
Although he hasn’t issued a detailed public statement specifically on the 2026 version of the SAVE Act, his past positions on similar legislation indicate his opposition stems from federalism and civil liberties concerns, not disagreement with the goal of election integrity.
Additionally, Paul has raised concerns about privacy and data security, particularly regarding the bill’s requirement for states to share voter information with the Department of Homeland Security. He worries this could lead to federal overreach and misuse of personal data.
The next question I would ask Rand Paul is, Are you concerned the DHS would use voter rolls to help catch and deport wetbacks?
If he says yes, remind him that the voter rolls are not supposed to include any wetbacks, as that would be a violation of law.
These are not RINOs. They are elected officials who betray the Americans they represent by actively engaging in working against the people’s best interest to serve either their own agenda or those of their overlords.
These are traitors to America, there is no better word for it. They are participating in the destruction of America.
Perfectly put Doug.
Man what a failure Rand Paul is.
Grassley also. He blocked many of Trumps appointments, stands in the way of FAIR elections, and is blocking the vote to override of the filibuster rule!
Both have posted on X from their official accounts that they support it. Both Rand Paul and Chuck Grassley have put out statements supporting the SAVE Act.
That’s amazing.
Yeah, Mega. I'm sure Rand's father is ashamed of him.
Shocking Rand Paul yes but what's up with Grassley?? I thought he was a good guy.
Somehow I glossed over his name, that's a good question
I asked AI why Rand Paul opposes it
Rand Paul opposes the SAVE Act because he views it as an overreach of federal power into state-managed elections, despite supporting the goal of verifying voter citizenship.
While Paul agrees that only U.S. citizens should vote, he has expressed constitutional concerns about the federal government mandating how states verify voter eligibility. He argues that election administration should remain primarily under state control, consistent with his long-standing libertarian principles and skepticism of federal mandates.
Additionally, Paul has raised concerns about privacy and data security, particularly regarding the bill’s requirement for states to share voter information with the Department of Homeland Security. He worries this could lead to federal overreach and misuse of personal data.
Although he hasn’t issued a detailed public statement specifically on the 2026 version of the SAVE Act, his past positions on similar legislation indicate his opposition stems from federalism and civil liberties concerns, not disagreement with the goal of election integrity.
The next question I would ask Rand Paul is, Are you concerned the DHS would use voter rolls to help catch and deport wetbacks?
If he says yes, remind him that the voter rolls are not supposed to include any wetbacks, as that would be a violation of law.