Dude. You came in here yelling about Rockefellers and Jewish lies and now you're writing a whole Wikipedia article about Greek words. Which one are you? The conspiracy guy or the scholar? Because those are two different people and you switched real quick when someone called you on it.
Nobody said Irenaeus had a Scofield Bible. Nobody. Point out where either Rando or Military said that. They didn't, you made that up so you could dunk on it. That's like me arguing with my kids about something they never said. Cool, you won a fight with yourself.
And this whole "precursors aren't systems" thing. Yeah no kidding. When did your boy Rushdoony put theonomy together, the 70s? That's like five minutes ago. But somehow that's legit and dispensationalism is a fraud because it was systematized in the 1800s. Make it make sense.
You blew right past Pseudo-Ephraem too. Just acted like that part wasn't there. For a church history guy that's a weird thing to just skip over. But I get it. Hard to deal with.
And the whole tone. The "oh son" stuff. The casserole line. The tunic joke. Bro you're trying way too hard. You sound like a youth pastor who just discovered sarcasm. You started this thread with the worst take in the room and now you're doing victory laps. For what exactly?
Bring Scripture or bring nothing. The rest of this is just you being in love with how you sound.
Do yourself a favor and sit down, before you embarrass yourself further.
That's your reply? That's what you came back with? Three lines and an emoji?
You just wrote a whole novel earlier with casserole metaphors and tunic jokes and now all you got is "strawman" and a laughing emoji. That's what happens when someone actually pins you down on your own logic. You go quiet.
Don't be mad because I just took the ball and dunked on your ass, allowing my nuts to smack your forehead as I did so.
Dude. You came in here yelling about Rockefellers and Jewish lies and now you're writing a whole Wikipedia article about Greek words. Which one are you? The conspiracy guy or the scholar? Because those are two different people and you switched real quick when someone called you on it.
Nobody said Irenaeus had a Scofield Bible. Nobody. Point out where either Rando or Military said that. They didn't, you made that up so you could dunk on it. That's like me arguing with my kids about something they never said. Cool, you won a fight with yourself.
And this whole "precursors aren't systems" thing. Yeah no kidding. When did your boy Rushdoony put theonomy together, the 70s? That's like five minutes ago. But somehow that's legit and dispensationalism is a fraud because it was systematized in the 1800s. Make it make sense.
You blew right past Pseudo-Ephraem too. Just acted like that part wasn't there. For a church history guy that's a weird thing to just skip over. But I get it. Hard to deal with.
And the whole tone. The "oh son" stuff. The casserole line. The tunic joke. Bro you're trying way too hard. You sound like a youth pastor who just discovered sarcasm. You started this thread with the worst take in the room and now you're doing victory laps. For what exactly?
Bring Scripture or bring nothing. The rest of this is just you being in love with how you sound.
Do yourself a favor and sit down, before you embarrass yourself further.
That's your reply? That's what you came back with? Three lines and an emoji? You just wrote a whole novel earlier with casserole metaphors and tunic jokes and now all you got is "strawman" and a laughing emoji. That's what happens when someone actually pins you down on your own logic. You go quiet.
Don't be mad because I just took the ball and dunked on your ass, allowing my nuts to smack your forehead as I did so.
I believe I satisfied his biblical reference request in my reply to his pseudo dunk on me.
Thanks for bringing some clarity to the conversation.
Numbers 6:24-26
People like him piss me off. Especially the pompousness.