Tucker has never been on the side of Q. Ever. He hits the mark sometimes and the truth he espouts lines up often in the last few years, but again, a LOT of people are not Anons or believers of Q. Tucker used to be in the Classical (ignorant?) Democrat party.
I can't say I fully trust Tucker but what he presents publicly always seems to be 100% conservative, America first values. The issues he butts heads with Trump with are his bigger government, more spending, expansion of federal powers, support by Israel and Aipac and vice versa, lack of arrests and not withdrawing from Ukraine. So I can't find fault with him for pushing back a bit.
Tucker has never been on the side of Q. Ever. He hits the mark sometimes and the truth he espouts lines up often in the last few years, but again, a LOT of people are not Anons or believers of Q. Tucker used to be in the Classical (ignorant?) Democrat party.
I can't say I fully trust Tucker but what he presents publicly always seems to be 100% conservative, America first values. The issues he butts heads with Trump with are his bigger government, more spending, expansion of federal powers, support by Israel and Aipac and vice versa, lack of arrests and not withdrawing from Ukraine. So I can't find fault with him for pushing back a bit.
I agree
Gosh. I'm just used to being chastised here.
Careful you might be accuse of being someone who thinks we are too stupid to learn.
Also has ties to the CIA. I don't trust him.
As if you should trust any of them ?
I don't - but some less than others.
You don't know he's not on the side of Q. The default setting of following Q is to participate anonymously.
I'd be 10x more suspicious of him if he publicly declared support of Q.