Seems like this should be a bigger deal on this board. First arrest?? I'm feeling good!!
(www.nbcnews.com)
🏆 - WINNING - 🏆
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
I beg to differ.
To put it in a Promethean way:
The Brits (Rothchild) took US finances in a hostile takeover. Something, something Titanic, and secret meetings on Jekyll Island. This was over a hundred years ago.
US wealth was taken in a series of pumps and dumps. Think 1929 crash, for example, or Vietnam and the oil-crisis in the seventies, the crash in the eighties. You get the idea.
2a) 30's Berlin became a hive of trans and homo activity - to the point that brownshirts were burning their books. Much spin about this, but check Liza Minelli's Cabaret for context.
3a. USA is set up by 'the globalists' as the policeman, and industrial/monetary base to Europe.
4a. USA is now, since the late forties, in a racket of bloodmoney/reconstruction of Europe and military 'support'.
5a. Jimmy Savile, uncle Mountbatten and Prince Andrew, the golden boys, are all making a mess of little children, (actually Andrew was a boy at the time, so possible he was groomed by the uncle). But mainly, the behavior was sold as part of a 'sexual revolution' which was also psy-opped in the USA. So Hollywood was normalizing it, and the Queen was sweeping it under the carpet to try and retain some dignity, as was normal in her generation.
5b. USA went off the gold standard during this time - which meant that a whole new sphere of corruption-operations was opened for Rothchild et al.
5c. The spooks (always an element of organized crime) needed money to expand, so started playing 'Opium wars' games. That is, using drugs. Cartels, etc.
Britain and UAS are entangled to the core, and that's why a 'First arrest' occurring in Britain, fits the Q narrative.
Anyway, form another angle:
I am quoting the AI because that's the average view, or even the adjusted view, if the algos are meant to 'shape the narrative'. It doesn't matter. It's prolly true - trust but verify. If true, then that sheds light on the outrageous lack of protocol:
Trump breaks royal etiquette, walks in front of Queen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyBKS-rV4eE
Trump Walks Ahead of King Charles III: Echoes 2019 Queen Elizabeth Moment,Palace Protocol Questioned https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OEfgj5KEhU
But why is he really doing that? He was quite the gentleman about it, so This Was Not a Mistake.
So, First arrest can definitely be a disgusting ex-Royal over the pond.
President Trump is indeed the direct descendant of King Christian I of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden (1426-1481) - 19 generations Great-Grandfather - through King James IV of Scotland by his mothers maternal lineage of MacLeod, MacKay and Gordon.
I wonder if Melanie is a Romanov?
Interesting, but recent DNA samples from the graves rules this out. The whole family was killed.
Claims linking Trump to Christian I (or other royals like Hakon V of Norway) originate primarily from 2016–2017 media stories (e.g., Iceland Monitor articles citing an Icelandic genealogist) and enthusiast blogs/PDFs (e.g., self-published works on "Viking" or ancient ancestries). These often rely on broad, distant connections through medieval intermarriages common among European nobility, but they do not establish a direct, verifiable patrilineal or clear maternal line through the specified clans to Trump. -Grok
Well Grok doesn't do genealogy, real people like me do and I have confirmed each maternal link. So stick it Grok.
So you have never before seen records of the Royal Family trees? Why haven't you shared them with the world??
Excellent! That explains a huge gap I wasn’t aware of, thanks!
Great comment!