The tariffs at issue here may or may not be wise policy.
👉But as a matter of text, history, and precedent, they are
clearly lawful.👈 I respectfully dissent.
Tariffs were first implemented in the United States immediately after its founding, with the 👉Tariff Act of 1789, signed into law by President George Washington on July 4, 1789.👈 As the second act passed by the first Congress, it was designed to raise revenue for the new government and 👉protect domestic...👈
So, SCOTUS does not uphold the Constitution of the United States? They rule to make the United States fall?
I prefer to listen to Robert Gouveia analyze this than to look at an incomplete news graphic.
👉Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf
Per Honorable Justice Kavanaugh...
https://anderseninstitute.org/tariff-debates-are-as-old-as-america/
That implies that Congress passed the Tariff Act first! If you put all the information together, you have two routes to get the tariffs through:
You find which 'statutory box' needs to be checked, get it done quickly, and make emergency SCOTUS appeal.
You go through the legislative branch, and get Congress on board for tariffs. (Using the standing filibuster if necessary)
(See u/Swampthing247 comments above....)
(I don't link Q posts often enough to remember the code, and feel rather foolish for that , so here's the link:
https://qagg.news/?q=it+must+be+done+right&q2=added
Excellent comment IMHO.
This?
u/#q3725
Yes, If you could comment with how you did that, I'd be appreciative. I forgot, since I don't do it as often as I should here!
squish this up with no spaces:
u/ # q3725
Gouveia is a blessing and a brilliant lawyer. I watch him every day to keep up with the legal side of things.
Excellent link fren!