Pam Bondi Subpoenaed In Epstein Investigation By House Oversight Panel
(www.zerohedge.com)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
I’m still subscribing to the idea POTUS is directing this Epstein saga to achieve maximum damage to those involved. He has the Dems begging for the information that will lead to their Party’s destruction. Bondi is playing her role in the movie.
The House Oversight Committee voted 24-19 on Wednesday to subpoena Bondi for a deposition, escalating a fight with the Department of Justice over its handling of records from the sprawling Epstein investigation. Lawmakers say the DOJ may have pulled tens of thousands of pages from public view despite a federal law requiring the material to be released.
Four Republicans - Reps. Lauren Boebert, Scott Perry, Tim Burchett and Michael Cloud - joined Democrats on the panel to force the subpoena through.
The dispute centers on the Epstein Transparency Act, passed almost unanimously by Congress last year. The law ordered the Justice Department to publicly release its trove of investigative material related to Epstein and his convicted accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.
In January, the DOJ released more than 3 million documents tied to the case. But the department later said it would not release the remaining files, estimated to include another 2.5 million documents.
Since then, watchdogs and journalists say the situation has gotten even murkier.
According to reports, thousands of records that had briefly been available online have vanished from the public database. CBS News reported Tuesday that more than 47,000 files - totaling about 65,500 pages - were taken down by late February.
Slow. Methodical. Legal. Winning.
Let me see if I can get this right;
"I can't comment on an ongoing investigation".
The Democrats just outright lie, and the Republicans just stonewall.
The democrats also stonewall. That saying is quoted constantly by the FBI. A great way to bury the truth. About J6 and 2020 steal among others.
It's heartening to see our congress working for us.
So I'm wondering if this is where those documents were deemed too explicit in content or referring to too graphic of information for the public consumption.
And the drumroll leads to full frazzledrip level of details coming out. Memos and interviews detailing the really bad stuff.
They technically complied by making it availble at first for a time, then pulled it.
https://x.com/ashlanddog/status/2029357555185603025?s=20