Welcome to Erik Carlson on Breaking the System:
https://rumble.com/v76u40u-breaking-the-system-episode-2.html
I don’t have much to add to this, but there is definitely one point for anons to be aware of, with our recent Israel-oriented posts…
Erik, just a bit before the 17:00 mark (the intro ends at 8:18. Funny, you guys.), points out;
Lately a lot of people within the MAGA and fake MAGA “inflooencers” (Property of: u/FractalizingIron) attacking Trump. They say he’s controlled by the Jews and it’s all just “the Jews, the Jews, the Jews,” right? These people that are saying that.. listen to if they ever, ever talk bad about the City of London and MI6. What they’re doing, if you want to protect the head of The Snake, you have to sacrifice the tails.
“We don’t like that he’s just breaking the system, because we want to see people get punched in the face.. we want our pound of flesh.. but in the long run, it’s better if we focus on fixing the system, and taking the pound of flesh would get in the way of that.”
Apply that to say, posters on a forum, for example.
Now then, about that City of London. Who’s running it again? Do we have a good org chart? Is the public one actually the real one?
Where’s all the frogs with deep dives on Ye Auld Londinium?
Bingo. And they use the Jews in Israel as fodder for hate, and too many people fall for it, kek.
Somehow I feel like the Israelis never forgave the Bride for working against the New Israelis purposes in the early days....
And perhaps they took over London Finance as a result.
What I do know is that we need to prevent the Islamic from taking over our financial system as it moves to be Texas based. There is a reason why they are working to set up Islamic Neighborhoods in Dallas/Ft.Worth.
https://youtube.com/shorts/o7lkbFmxCi0
Just ran into something really neat while doing another dig out of this video.
One thing that say, Libertarians never really touch on much is the original American system of synergistic government cooperation with American business. “How is that different from socialism?”
Well, I don’t know, but it surely is somehow. Maybe it diverges in ownership vs operational assistance? As “the people” voluntarily aid the government, a business endeavor antithetical to the interests of the people could be rejected? Just spitballing, but I digress…
They mentioned “merchant marines” - a term some of us have likely heard, but far fewer are familiar with. Public / private partnership between government and naval commerce, of which one note that I saw claimed that we have scarce little left and Trump may be rebuilding. (Relevant to this thread in that - ties between Straight of Hormuz and Lloyd’s of London - and we couldn’t insure shipments because […])
Bumped into the old term “Shanghaiied” - or “impressment” - basically grabbing people from a landing and forcing them to work on a ship. This practice was a serious issue in San Francisco and Portland, after having been a problem in some towns back East previously.
The practice, which was effectively a form of slavery, was ended by a populist Democrat (LaFollette, who’d previously been a Republican, seriously challenging Taft and T.R. And Coolidge for president, and opposing WW later, but I’m trying to give them some credit, here).
Funny how we basically aren’t taught anything about this. “How does that not end up as ‘cronyism’?” I don’t know! Just a crayon eater sitting here trying to figure things out.
The difference between "original American system of synergistic government cooperation with private American business" and the current day communism is: In communism there is no private businesses. All businesses are state owned, and hence the idea of cooperation with private business is moot.
And the difference between that original system and current day public-private partnerships is: Public-Private partnerships do not have direct government control and hence are outside all sovereign checks and balances. Also, the "public" part refers to funding from the government, and "private" part represents private individuals amenable to the agenda.
The original American system (which is also what Trump is bringing back) is market driven, and fully under government checks and balances.
Kek, well when you put it that way, it’s a bit more obvious!
appreciation for holding the line on this!
Do the Brits refer to non-Brits as “mudbloods” or some shit I’m missing? They generally seem pretty cucked to me, by comparison.