The destruction of the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which I have been generalizing as the "Dome of the Rock," is an absolute and unequivocal certainty.
That's when the Storm really kicks off.
That's when the Market really crashes.
That's when IPETGOATII 'goes live.'
An 'Anon' cannot be a 'believer of coincidence.'
They are antithetical to one another.
'Anon' is a Title.
A belief in BIG coincidences is a moral failing to be corrected.
Are you watching closely?
https://files.catbox.moe/ib84kg.mov
Trump's Lotus Gift:
https://files.catbox.moe/ezyx15.jpeg
White Rabbit:
https://files.catbox.moe/t18ruz.jpeg
Bullet hole:
https://files.catbox.moe/5smw0b.jpeg
Coincidence?
https://files.catbox.moe/8qe2rz.jpeg
"Follow the white rabbit."
STORM = 350 = IPETGOATII
If you still can't see it, consider the possibility that you may NOT WANT TO.
If you're content with believing in BIG coincidences, regardless of Q's explicit instructions, then please go to settings, set community styling to OFF, and come back and give this post a down vote.
"For I found all of them drunk, and none were thirsty."
~Jesus Christ
The REAL, ORIGINAL and ONLY "I Pet Goat" short by Heliofant: https://youtu.be/Gt0WvHLxZTA?si=JV2jfMVAGPuP001i
7:28 runtime.
7+2+8 = 17
IPETGOATII PROOFS:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BGFSJTOg/qognitive-dissonance-n-the-psyqo/
The quote "For I found all of them drunk, and none were thirsty" is not found in the Bible or any authentic biblical text. It does not appear in the provided search results or in any known version of the New Testament, including the Gospel of John, where Jesus speaks about thirst and living water.
Jesus’ actual words in John 4:14 are: "But whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life."
This passage uses physical thirst as a metaphor for spiritual longing. Jesus offers "living water" — a symbol of eternal life and the Holy Spirit — to those who believe in Him. The idea that people are "drunk" and "not thirsty" may reflect a modern or interpretive commentary, but it is not a direct quote from Jesus.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
The Gospel of Thomas saying #28.
Found in the Nag Hammadi library 1940s.
Also known as "The Q Gospel" which is different than "the gospel of Q."
I don't limit myself to only the early Christian writings that Rome deemed "official" during the council of Nicaea
Gal. 1:6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel, 7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed.
The Gospel of Thomas is a non-canonical text that has attracted attention for its collection of 114 sayings attributed to Jesus. While some of these sayings resemble those in the canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John), the Gospel of Thomas is not considered Scripture by mainstream Christianity. It was discovered in 1945 among the Nag Hammadi library in Egypt and is written in Coptic, likely translated from an earlier Greek version.
Despite its surface appeal, especially to those interested in "lost" Christian texts, the Gospel of Thomas fails key tests for authenticity and orthodoxy used by the early Church.
Gospel of Thomas
Authorship and Dating Issues The Gospel of Thomas was not written by the apostle Thomas. The text claims to be recorded by "Didymos Judas Thomas," but scholars universally reject this attribution. The earliest manuscript fragments date from 130–250 AD, and most scholars place its composition in the mid-2nd century, long after the apostles had died.
This late date means it cannot be based on eyewitness testimony, a key criterion for inclusion in the New Testament canon. Additionally, the text appears to depend on the canonical Gospels—especially Luke—and may even rely on Tatian’s Diatessaron (a Gospel harmony from around 172 AD), further confirming its late origin.
Gospel of Thomas Coptic-language early Christian non-canonical gospel, part of the Nag Hammadi library Wikipedia Quotes Read Online Summary Analysis El_Evangelio_de_Tomás-Gospel_of_Thomas-_Codex_II_Manuscritos_de_Nag_Hammadi-The_Nag_Hammadi_manuscripts.png Theological Inconsistencies with Orthodox Christianity The Gospel of Thomas contradicts core Christian doctrines. Unlike the canonical Gospels, it contains no narrative of Jesus’ birth, ministry, death, or resurrection. There is no mention of the atonement, the cross, or the bodily resurrection—central elements of the Christian faith.
Instead, salvation in Thomas is achieved through secret knowledge (gnosis), not faith in Christ’s redemptive work. This directly opposes the New Testament teaching that salvation is by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8–9).
One particularly troubling saying (Saying 114) claims:
“Simon Peter said to them, ‘Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life.’ Jesus said, ‘I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.’”
This denigrates women and contradicts Genesis 1:27, which affirms that both men and women are made in the image of God.
Gospel of Thomas Sayings 114 site:reddit.com
Gnostic Influences and Teachings The Gospel of Thomas is widely recognized as a Gnostic text. Gnosticism taught that the material world is evil, the God of the Old Testament is a lesser, flawed deity, and salvation comes through esoteric knowledge that liberates the soul from the physical body.
The Gospel of Thomas reflects these beliefs:
Emphasis on secret sayings ("These are the secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke") Sayings like “Whoever discovers the interpretation of these sayings will not taste death” (Saying 1) suggest salvation through insight, not faith No belief in a physical resurrection—only spiritual enlightenment These ideas were condemned as heretical by early Church Fathers such as Irenaeus, Hippolytus, Origen, and Eusebius.
What is Gnosticism?
Structural and Literary Differences from Canonical Gospels Unlike the four canonical Gospels, which present a coherent narrative of Jesus’ life, teachings, death, and resurrection, the Gospel of Thomas is a disconnected list of sayings (logia) with no plot, context, or chronology.
It lacks:
Narrative structure Historical setting Miracles or parables with explanations Theological development This format is inconsistent with the genre of the canonical Gospels, which are biographical proclamations of the "good news" (gospel) of Jesus Christ.
canonical vs non-canonical gospels
Early Church Rejection The early Church never considered the Gospel of Thomas as Scripture. It is absent from all early canonical lists, including the Muratorian Fragment (late 2nd century) and Athanasius’ Festal Letter (367 AD), which defined the New Testament canon.
Church leaders explicitly rejected it:
Irenaeus (c. 180 AD) listed it among heretical writings Eusebius (before 326 AD) called it an “impious and heretical fiction” Cyril of Jerusalem (347–348 AD) warned believers to avoid it Pope Gelasius (5th century) included it in a list of heretical books The Church did not "suppress" the text out of fear—it rejected it because it failed the tests of apostolic origin, doctrinal consistency, and universal acceptance.
early church fathers on Gospel of Thomas
Conclusion The Gospel of Thomas is not a reliable or orthodox account of Jesus’ teachings. It is a late, non-apostolic, Gnostic text that:
Was not written by Thomas Contradicts core Christian doctrines Promotes salvation through secret knowledge Denigrates women Was rejected by the early Church
There are no coincidences.
Here is the video being referenced: I Pet Goat II
I made it as far as 55 seconds before I stopped it.
That would be a very big deal indeed.
It would, WW3 would follow on from that, but so could the second coming of Christ.
I would imagine it would set off terroristic attacks by devout Muslims in all countries.
u/#q35
A great reminder in these crazy days.
What like Armageddon?
When God kicks off nuclear war, and 144,000 believers fly up in the air, while Jesus, THE Prince of Peace, decends on a white horse...
Yeah... I believe THAT
Um, I don’t know where you get your information from, but the book of Revelation does not state any of that.
Just for S&G, here's what the AI Twat says about it:
Based on biblical prophecy and interpretation (primarily Revelation 16-19), the Battle of Armageddon is depicted as the final, worldwide conflict where human governments, deceived by demonic forces, assemble to fight against God. It is not just a localized war in the Middle East, but a global event where Jesus returns to destroy the forces of evil, cast the Antichrist and False Prophet into a lake of fire, and establish his kingdom.
Here is a breakdown of the key elements you mentioned:
The Gathering: Kings of the earth and their armies gather at a place called Armageddon (Mount Megiddo) for the "war of the great day of God the Almighty". The Conflict: It is described as a, direct, and swift judgment from God rather than a long, drawn-out military conflict.
Destruction of Enemies: God uses weapons such as earthquakes, torrential rain, hailstones, fire, and brimstone. The forces of the Antichrist are defeated, and their flesh is described as dissolving while they stand. Final Judgment: The Beast (Antichrist) and the False Prophet are captured and thrown alive into a lake of fire.
The Return: Jesus Christ appears from heaven riding on a white horse, accompanied by the armies of heaven.
The Conqueror: Unlike his first coming on a donkey, he returns as a victorious warrior and judge ("Faithful and True").
The Weapon: He strikes down the nations with a "sharp sword" that proceeds from his mouth, which is interpreted as the power of his spoken word. Judgment: He is described as treading the "winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God".
Identity: Revelation 7 and 14 identify the 144,000 as 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Role: They are "sealed" by God for protection during the end-times judgment, serving as a special group of witnesses or servants. Some interpretations, such as those of Jehovah's Witnesses, believe this is a literal number who rule with Christ in heaven, while others interpret it as a symbolic number for the complete church. Protection: They are portrayed as standing with the Lamb (Jesus) on Mount Zion, having followed him wherever he goes.
Biblical Language: The Bible does not explicitly mention "nuclear weapons." However, many modern interpreters see the descriptions in Revelation and Zechariah 14:12 as metaphors or accurate descriptions of nuclear destruction, such as flesh "consuming away while they stand on their feet".
The Red Horse: The second of the four horsemen of the Apocalypse (a red horse) is often linked to the outbreak of global war and the potential for nuclear devastation during the tribulation.
Satan Bound: Following the defeat of his armies, Satan is bound and cast into a bottomless pit for 1,000 years.
The Second Coming: This entire event constitutes the Second Coming of Jesus, ending the Great Tribulation.
AI Twat is shits and giggles.
Which part, specifically?
You know people actually believe this right?
The white horse thing and the 144k flying up on the air and shit, right?
You ARE aware of this?
Took a while for the round to have an effect...but sure as rain...it got there
Like I said AI Twat is shit and giggles.
Your choice.
2 Peter 3:3-5 New King James Version 3 knowing this first: that scoffers will come in the last days, walking according to their own lusts, 4 and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation.”
But what if an Iranian missile hits the dome on the rock??
If this were to happen, I’m sure that the information about the missile being from Iran would not make it to the viewers of mainstream media.