This is actually insane.
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Still mrna. As a Christian, I won't take it. Just like any other mrna shot. I believe ivermectin and the fen & menbendazol is still the cure.
This dude is showing what the technology can do when population control loving satanists aren’t using it for their own twisted ends.
It’s like anything, capable of good or evil. But the Pandora’s box is already open.
One of Satan’s goals is to change our DNA so that we are no longer in the image of God. He was successful with the Nephilim until God destroyed them with the flood. Satan is still working this angle. I refuse to take anything MRNA.
Isn’t that technically what the Covid jab may have done? Maybe the whole point. That time period still creeps me the fk out.
Remember that lighting ceremony in UK palace with the Queen where the lights being lit up looked like a DNA strand?
God is Spirit not flesh so the image of God we have is the gift of holy spirit. Satan can not affect your holy spirit as it according to corinthians is "incorruptable". Instill wouldnt take jabs or any of their crap but lets not hash Gods Word into ridiculous suppositions.
"capable of good or evil"
This is precisely the point. It is a matter of trust. Can you trust the people injecting gene therapies into your arm and calling them "vaccines?"
Without guardrails this technology will cause mass extinction.
A tool is not evil. Evil people use useful tools for evil purposes.
Once the world is free from their matrix, "vaccines," or in this case, experimental immunotherapies, will be as useful as any other tool. In this case, perhaps better than most.
Some tools are evil inspired and by design and have no honest and good use. For instance, lies are a tool of the devil and tjere is no lie that produces good except in the mind of the corrupt.
I was talking about physical tools. More specifically, I was talking about immunotherapies against cancer (which was the purpose of the OP). However, even in the mental realm, "good" v. "evil" has more to do with intent than how it is used.
For example;
This is a clear statement of intention to lie by omission by Q and the Q team in their Show. Presumably, the intent of that lie of omission is a mercy.
We are fighting for good, for life. Not everything will be clean. That means somethings will seem evil. Indeed, they ARE evil. That's what "not everything will be clean" means. Sometimes you have to do evil to accomplish the greater good. That includes lying, cheating, murder, knowingly allowing a pandemic that kills millions, knowingly allowing the use of a good, promising tool (immunotherapy) to murder millions more using that good tool for evil purposes, etc.
So what is "good" or "evil"? I assert it is intent, not the tool itself or even the result. I suggest that applies in all domains.
Does the tool prevent Salvation through Christ?
Not "can it", but "does it". Anything that separates us from God is evil, period.
Name a tool that does that all by itself, regardless of the intent of the user.
I have my concerns about the Mark of the Beast, regardless of the form it takes.
But I think you're correct. If someone were forceably "branded" with the Mark against their will I believe they would still be saved.
Even with the mRNA jab or other gene therapy to try and destroy the image of God within us, when we get resurrected we get a new body.
As a semi-agnostic-on the-fencer, Ill go NOWHERE NEAR MRNA EVER either. But happy for his dog.