I looked at the Deagel Report forecast for 2025 and realized that most (or all?) of the countries with significant population declines had had a baby boom related to WWII. Then I looked at countries that had no decline in their forecast and noticed that a lot of them are the source of immigrants to the baby boom countries.
Canada in 2016 had more people over age 65 than children under 15 years of age. Those 5.9 million over 65 Canadians are now either dead or over 75, so that's a huge block of the population to lose, particularly with deeply declined birth rates.
I'm certainly not trying to justify the immigration of incompatible cultures, I'm just seeing a plausible primary explanation for it.
They are paying 3rd World Gimmigrants huge money to have kids, with Canadian wealth. While they simultaneously starve Canadians with zero support and a higher cost of living. It is an unbelievable Treasonous treacherous Agenda.
Taxpayers cannot afford to have a large family, trying mightily to be fiscally responsible, YET are paying for immigrants with many children!!
My advice, have your family anyway! The illegal immigrants do, and you are paying for THEIR children!
#2 is a problem; wymn do not need a family for financial "independence" so are subject to the patriarchy of government instead of loving fathers and husbands. The gov't will not love them when they are 65, and by choice had no children or aborted them.
#3 Feminism destroyed male chivalry and protection of virginity.
all true.........it is sad that big money pushed it so women are in the workforce more so now it takes 2 paychecks just to pay the bills.........ahhh the good old days.......
The so-called good old days were when we were blind to the cabal. The cabal was still there. Even if mothers had stayed home to take care of their children, the cabal would still have made sure that families would not have enough money to survive on one paycheck. All the cabal needed to do was to make necessities unaffordable. This would have forced women to work, whether they wanted to or not.
YES! Another effect of feminism that destroys the family! USSR was the first to "support" women in the workforce with abortion and the benefit of children in propaganda child care.
YES! TWO incomes are now required to support a family, while before only ONE income was enough!
A woman intelligent enough to be hired for a wage that covers child care [and taxes!], is the one who is best qualified to care for her own children, rather than minimum-wage child-care hires!! HINT: take out taxes, communing costs [cost of another car] and child care costs before deciding that you cannot afford to be a mother at home.
Wymn, your job or the government will not love you when you are 65. Why be a wage-slave? instead of a caring, educating mother of your own children?
I was unlucky and lucky. I did not find the right guy until I was well into my career, so did not have the family size I desired. But I was far enough in my career, to retire from it to be home.
and what do these lazy guys that sit in their mamas basement playing video games have to offer a nice girl?and the other side of the coin what do any of these girls with 4 baby daddies with an ass as big as a house running around looking like an overstuffed sausage in spandex have to offer a decent young guy?
It would be very interesting to see a count of how many people closely associated with Deagel took the vaccine. It might be eye opening. I think someone knew something, but were they willing to also sacrifice those working around them?
They predicted USA to cut its population in half by 2025. You don't do that by abstinence. You do that by killing over 100 million people. That was their plan.
I never placed much stock in this deagle business...
I categorize it right along side of those stacks of FEMA black plastic casket liners sitting in some obscure train depot... where dillrods post pics of it every few years since around 2001 as "proof" how they're gonna round you up in FEMA camps and bury your ass.
I looked at the Deagel Report forecast for 2025 and realized that most (or all?) of the countries with significant population declines had had a baby boom related to WWII. Then I looked at countries that had no decline in their forecast and noticed that a lot of them are the source of immigrants to the baby boom countries.
Canada in 2016 had more people over age 65 than children under 15 years of age. Those 5.9 million over 65 Canadians are now either dead or over 75, so that's a huge block of the population to lose, particularly with deeply declined birth rates.
I'm certainly not trying to justify the immigration of incompatible cultures, I'm just seeing a plausible primary explanation for it.
its simple people cant afford to have kids #1 and most young girls are more worried about a career #2 #3 young men have no responsibility any more
They are paying 3rd World Gimmigrants huge money to have kids, with Canadian wealth. While they simultaneously starve Canadians with zero support and a higher cost of living. It is an unbelievable Treasonous treacherous Agenda.
Updoot for Gimmigrants
absolutely
Gimmigrants
🏆 You just won the interwebs!!! 🏆
THIS!
Taxpayers cannot afford to have a large family, trying mightily to be fiscally responsible, YET are paying for immigrants with many children!!
My advice, have your family anyway! The illegal immigrants do, and you are paying for THEIR children!
#2 is a problem; wymn do not need a family for financial "independence" so are subject to the patriarchy of government instead of loving fathers and husbands. The gov't will not love them when they are 65, and by choice had no children or aborted them.
#3 Feminism destroyed male chivalry and protection of virginity.
all true.........it is sad that big money pushed it so women are in the workforce more so now it takes 2 paychecks just to pay the bills.........ahhh the good old days.......
The so-called good old days were when we were blind to the cabal. The cabal was still there. Even if mothers had stayed home to take care of their children, the cabal would still have made sure that families would not have enough money to survive on one paycheck. All the cabal needed to do was to make necessities unaffordable. This would have forced women to work, whether they wanted to or not.
YES! Another effect of feminism that destroys the family! USSR was the first to "support" women in the workforce with abortion and the benefit of children in propaganda child care.
YES! TWO incomes are now required to support a family, while before only ONE income was enough!
A woman intelligent enough to be hired for a wage that covers child care [and taxes!], is the one who is best qualified to care for her own children, rather than minimum-wage child-care hires!! HINT: take out taxes, communing costs [cost of another car] and child care costs before deciding that you cannot afford to be a mother at home.
Wymn, your job or the government will not love you when you are 65. Why be a wage-slave? instead of a caring, educating mother of your own children?
I was unlucky and lucky. I did not find the right guy until I was well into my career, so did not have the family size I desired. But I was far enough in my career, to retire from it to be home.
and what do these lazy guys that sit in their mamas basement playing video games have to offer a nice girl?and the other side of the coin what do any of these girls with 4 baby daddies with an ass as big as a house running around looking like an overstuffed sausage in spandex have to offer a decent young guy?
nothing
But welfare and feminism created this outcome.
along with the demonrat party and the so called education system
Feature not a flaw, it follows the USSR communist pattern exactly.
It was a prediction of what they were hoping for after the vaxxx rollout.
It would be very interesting to see a count of how many people closely associated with Deagel took the vaccine. It might be eye opening. I think someone knew something, but were they willing to also sacrifice those working around them?
They predicted USA to cut its population in half by 2025. You don't do that by abstinence. You do that by killing over 100 million people. That was their plan.
I never placed much stock in this deagle business...
I categorize it right along side of those stacks of FEMA black plastic casket liners sitting in some obscure train depot... where dillrods post pics of it every few years since around 2001 as "proof" how they're gonna round you up in FEMA camps and bury your ass.
The
spiceloosh must flow...u/#catdance