I missed this back then.

Still no regrets not getting the jab.

Still waiting for the "winter of severe illness and death" we were promised.

Valuable reminder from memory lane. Glad to see it getting airplay again.

Even more disturbing was the subsequent video. Dr. Andreas Noack was live streaming from that same attic room when the German storm troopers burst into his house and hauled him away. His distraught wife said he was murdered. Some called it a fake but I don't think he has been heard from since.

Noack died on November 26, 2021 (or around that date), shortly after posting his graphene hydroxide video (some sources say hours or a few days later).Official accounts: His partner (who was pregnant at the time) later stated in follow-up videos that he collapsed at home, was taken to a hospital in Wolfsberg, Austria, and died from a heart attack due to tricuspid heart valve failure. Austrian police and local media described it as a natural death. He was reported to be 57 years old.

I asked Grok of this was true. I found it interesting that two of articles debunking it came from poltifact.com:

No, graphene hydroxide does not act as a "razor blade" within the human body in the way described in viral claims. This idea stems from a 2021 video by German chemist Andreas Noack, who alleged that COVID-19 vaccines (particularly Pfizer) contained graphene hydroxide nanoparticles behaving like non-biodegradable nanoscale razor blades. These supposedly circulated in the bloodstream, slicing the smooth endothelial lining of blood vessels and causing internal bleeding, clots, or sudden deaths (e.g., in athletes). Noack died shortly after the video, fueling conspiracy narratives, but the core scientific claim lacks credible evidence.

politifact.com

Origin and Lack of Evidence for the ClaimNoack described graphene hydroxide as mono-layered, atomically thin (0.1 nm thick, ~50 nm long) structures that remain suspended in liquid and mechanically cut epithelial cells like razors, especially in fast-flowing blood. He claimed it wouldn't appear in standard toxicology or autopsies due to its size and non-biological nature.

forensicscijournal.com

Independent fact-checks, regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA), and vaccine manufacturers confirm that authorized COVID-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide, graphene hydroxide, or any graphene-based materials. Ingredient lists are public; alleged detections (e.g., via Raman spectroscopy in unofficial samples) used unvalidated methods, unknown-origin vials, or were not replicated by credible labs.

politifact.com

"Graphene hydroxide" as a distinct material is not standard terminology in chemistry—graphene oxide (GO) includes hydroxyl groups among its oxygen functionalities, but the "hydroxide" framing appears to be a misnomer or exaggeration in the claims. No peer-reviewed evidence supports its presence in vaccines or the razor-blade mechanism in humans.

skeptics.stackexchange.com

What Science Actually Shows About Graphene MaterialsGraphene-family nanomaterials (graphene, graphene oxide/GO, reduced GO) are two-dimensional carbon sheets studied for potential biomedical uses (e.g., drug delivery, imaging) but also for toxicity risks. Key points from toxicology research:Sharp edges and cell interactions: Graphene and GO can have jagged edges or protrusions that physically disrupt membranes in some contexts. In lab studies, they damage bacterial cell walls (antibacterial effect) via "nano-knife" or edge piercing, especially when sheets align perpendicularly or have low oxidation/functionalization. Similar edge effects occur in some mammalian cells in vitro, allowing uptake or minor membrane stress. However, this is not equivalent to macroscopic "razor blades" slicing vessels. In physiological fluids (blood, with proteins/ions), sheets often aggregate, form a "biomolecular corona," or get coated, reducing sharp-edge activity.

archive2.news.brown.edu

In vivo behavior (animal/human studies): High-dose or certain routes (e.g., inhalation, injection) can cause inflammation, oxidative stress (ROS), organ accumulation (lungs, liver, spleen), or fibrosis in rodents, but effects are highly dose-, size-, functionalization-, and dispersion-dependent. Low doses or properly functionalized forms often show better biocompatibility. A first-in-human trial (14 volunteers inhaling controlled graphene oxide nanosheets) found no acute changes in lung function, cardiovascular parameters, or systemic inflammation. A minor, non-clinically significant hint of clotting influence was noted, but overall well-tolerated.

ceramics.org

Intravenous or intraperitoneal studies in animals show variable results: some accumulation without major toxicity at lower doses; higher doses linked to weight changes, histopathology, or immune responses—but not widespread "slicing" or undetectable internal bleeding. Materials are often cleared (e.g., via kidneys) or elicit foreign-body responses like granulomas around aggregates, not razor-like cutting.

avadaingraphene.com

Blood and vessels: GO interacts with blood proteins and can influence clotting or immune activation in some lab conditions due to its 2D shape and surface chemistry, but not via mechanical razoring. No evidence supports indefinite circulation as cutting blades causing "Russian roulette" vascular damage. Human-relevant exposures (not vaccine-level, since none is present) do not produce the described pathology.

pubs.rsc.org

Toxicity is not inherent to graphene; many reported effects trace to impurities from production, high doses, or poor dispersion rather than the material itself. Functionalization (adding groups) or smaller sizes can mitigate risks. Pristine graphene or GO is not "biologically decomposable" easily, but the body handles or clears it variably without the catastrophic mechanical damage claimed.

avadaingraphene.com

Why the Claim Persists but Fails ScrutinyIt mixes real nanomaterial properties (sharp edges in controlled lab settings, potential toxicity at high exposures) with exaggeration and unverified vaccine content claims. Athlete deaths or clots have other well-studied explanations (e.g., COVID-19 itself increases clotting risk far more than vaccines). No autopsy or clinical evidence has confirmed graphene hydroxide "blades" as a cause of harm in vaccinated people. Claims rely on anecdotal videos and non-reproducible analyses.

In summary, while graphene-family materials warrant careful study for environmental/occupational exposure and biomedical applications (with dose and form mattering greatly), there is no scientific basis for them acting as razor blades in the human body—especially not from vaccines. The theory is a debunked conspiracy claim unsupported by toxicology data or vaccine composition. For health concerns related to nanomaterials, consult peer-reviewed sources and regulators rather than unverified viral videos.

I asked which way politifact leans and Grok had this to say:

PolitiFact leans left according to the two most prominent independent media bias rating organizations.

allsides.com

AllSides rates PolitiFact as Lean Left (on a scale where -6 is far left and +6 is far right; they place it at about -2). This assessment comes from multiple independent reviews of its content, story selection, and wording. As of early 2026, AllSides notes low or initial confidence in the exact placement but consistently finds a leftward tilt, especially in what claims it chooses to fact-check and how it frames them.

allsides.com

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) rates it Left-Center Biased (slightly to moderately left-leaning). They note that its fact-checks tend to be more favorable toward the left, while still assigning it High factual reporting overall (meaning its underlying facts are usually accurate, even if selection or emphasis shows bias).

mediabiasfactcheck.com

Razor blade like nano materials in the vaccine and Austria wants to forcefully vaccinate all.