Check back in 12 months to see if this prediction came true.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I always find it funny... This reaction when you probably enjoy Marvel movies and the aforementioned Lord of the Rings. {And that's not a slag off, just they're heavily CGI.}
And I'm sure Cgi is fine with you , right? Green screen? Pro tools? Drum machines? Brian Eno? Kraftwerk? Sequencers? Samplers?
I don't know, how about the fucking industrial revolution?
Bottom line is it's always in how you use a tool whether it's a crutch or not. If you use it to get a rough draft from your original material, I fail to see the harm in it. Because it's not creating your "art" it's streamlining the process for you.
CGI is different than AI generated and you fucking know it. Clown.
Found the Marvel idiot. ^
Aka, hypocrite.
Practical effects pioneers like Tom Savini and Rick Baker had to adapt to cgi because practical effects were being phased out. They had no choice.
That's my entire point. New tech comes, and you incorporate it into your workflow.
What you don't do is whinge about, clutching pearls.