It is a great analysis. And overall it makes a lot of sense.
But I think he's reading Russia and Ukraine incorrectly. From what Trump has said, the parties resisting a Ukr-Rus peace deal have been Europe and Ukraine, not Russia. So the energy crisis will force Ukraine and Western Europe into peace with Russia not the other way around. Sure it could help persuade Russia, but they are getting the carrot not the stick.
Further, Russia is an oil and LNG exporter, and likely to remain so. They will be rewarded for their self sufficiency and will profit from exports more than ever because of the energy crisis affecting Europe and China, who will both compete for Russian energy.
the parties resisting a Ukr-Rus peace deal have been Europe and Ukraine.
I think a more specific answer to this is that the parties resisting the peace deal are the members of the global cabal. This would include the leadership (not the people) of the European Union, NATO, WEF, WHO, UN, Bank of London, US Deep State, and all of the other usual suspects. The people who run the dark economy around the world.
This cabal was pushing to militarize Ukraine and push NATO membership for Ukraine, etc. NATO only exists if Russia is a threat. That is why it was set up and that is why it exists. It's just another money funneler to Europe from the USA, much like the Marshall Plan was the greatest rip-off of the USA in history. If Russia is not a threat, then why NATO?
Iran has proven that NATO is a meaningless puppet regime of rusty old ships and lazy commanders with no political will to fight or defend at all. Trump made it clear they were just a bunch of moochers in his first term, and I think he might just end it all for good, seeing that they have done NOTHING to support the effort against the terrorist regime of Iran.
Speaking of which, how much money have the City of London, Lloyds, and the cabal's money men made from insuring the Straight of Hormuz over the decades? With each ship worth a billion dollars, probably quite a bit! In addition to taking control of the oil away from Iran's terrorist regime, POTUS Trump is also taking control of the shipping and insurance markets for the Straight. What if the Straight was made safe and the US runs the toll booth there?
It is not unlike taking control of Venezuela's oil and shipping it to the US for refining, or taking control of the Panama Canal away from China.
I still think Greenland is in play. Would it be better to spend money on acquiring Greenland and locking in the resources and defensive location, or should we rely on our NATO "allies" going forward? The Danish leader has already quit. Maybe try again.
Ukraine's hits on Russian oil infrastructure are pinpricks. Russia has realigned its trade to China and India with new pipelines. The idea that the US with "control" Russia oil because of a handful of irritating, overhyped drone strikes on unguarded pipelines is ludicrous.
But as you said, overall, the play makes sense. Trump's realigning the dollar with real value. It's still a fiat currency, but the petrodollar system helps keep it stable. He can't force Congress to quit spending stupidly, but he can shore up the system for a little longer.
It is a great analysis. And overall it makes a lot of sense.
But I think he's reading Russia and Ukraine incorrectly. From what Trump has said, the parties resisting a Ukr-Rus peace deal have been Europe and Ukraine, not Russia. So the energy crisis will force Ukraine and Western Europe into peace with Russia not the other way around. Sure it could help persuade Russia, but they are getting the carrot not the stick.
Further, Russia is an oil and LNG exporter, and likely to remain so. They will be rewarded for their self sufficiency and will profit from exports more than ever because of the energy crisis affecting Europe and China, who will both compete for Russian energy.
Please tell me if I overlooked something on this.
Just my personal opinion...
I think a more specific answer to this is that the parties resisting the peace deal are the members of the global cabal. This would include the leadership (not the people) of the European Union, NATO, WEF, WHO, UN, Bank of London, US Deep State, and all of the other usual suspects. The people who run the dark economy around the world.
This cabal was pushing to militarize Ukraine and push NATO membership for Ukraine, etc. NATO only exists if Russia is a threat. That is why it was set up and that is why it exists. It's just another money funneler to Europe from the USA, much like the Marshall Plan was the greatest rip-off of the USA in history. If Russia is not a threat, then why NATO?
Iran has proven that NATO is a meaningless puppet regime of rusty old ships and lazy commanders with no political will to fight or defend at all. Trump made it clear they were just a bunch of moochers in his first term, and I think he might just end it all for good, seeing that they have done NOTHING to support the effort against the terrorist regime of Iran.
Speaking of which, how much money have the City of London, Lloyds, and the cabal's money men made from insuring the Straight of Hormuz over the decades? With each ship worth a billion dollars, probably quite a bit! In addition to taking control of the oil away from Iran's terrorist regime, POTUS Trump is also taking control of the shipping and insurance markets for the Straight. What if the Straight was made safe and the US runs the toll booth there?
It is not unlike taking control of Venezuela's oil and shipping it to the US for refining, or taking control of the Panama Canal away from China.
I still think Greenland is in play. Would it be better to spend money on acquiring Greenland and locking in the resources and defensive location, or should we rely on our NATO "allies" going forward? The Danish leader has already quit. Maybe try again.
Ukraine's hits on Russian oil infrastructure are pinpricks. Russia has realigned its trade to China and India with new pipelines. The idea that the US with "control" Russia oil because of a handful of irritating, overhyped drone strikes on unguarded pipelines is ludicrous.
But as you said, overall, the play makes sense. Trump's realigning the dollar with real value. It's still a fiat currency, but the petrodollar system helps keep it stable. He can't force Congress to quit spending stupidly, but he can shore up the system for a little longer.