This site is for us to share our research with others. "Always verify" makes sense as a precaution, but "Do your own research" just sounds lazy and really isn't helpful.
Not everyone can "monitor the situation" to the degree of rigor that thorough research requires. Many are still waging a daily war of just trying to survive among crippling debt and overwhelming inflation. Some use GAW simply to help filter out the excess noise on X (since most posts here are just reposts of stuff from X anyway).
Please be mindful that many are not as blessed with their free time as you might be.
Grok...lol lol lol lol Right...
Seriously. I don't know why people think Grok is trustworthy, just because Musk is involved in it.
Copy/paste one of the chats from here, just pick any one of them and give it to Grok and just use the directive "analyze this chat". And watch how it tears Q and everyone apart.
I love Grok. Its far better than the others.
One of my favorite things to do is push back on Grok. You are correct that many LLM (Large Language Model) AI agents push MSM level propaganda.
I had an in depth discussion with Grok about this. I forgot the topic but it was something about vaccines or elections. Something big like that. Grok kept referencing "Institutional Sources" as a source of truth. I pushed back and said, Grok, don't you realize that it is the very institutions that are corrupted?
Grok completely flipped and said, you are right, the largest source content comes from higher education and mainstream media. The overwhelming amount significantly impacts the large language model system that I use. Higher education and media are significantly liberal, etc.
I said, good. Now update your algorithm to be aware of this bias. Grok said, its conversations like these that make me better at providing accurate answers.
I am quite certain that I sourced my position to Grok with articles I found here on GAW. So keep producing research frens. And use our research to train AI.
u/#flynnarmy u/#5genwarfare
LLMs are wishy washy and will change their stance based on your responses.
You know there are other uses for them that are extremely helpful, right? Things like: when does Lowe's in (your city) close tonight, do they have xyz in stock (may get bot blocked on that but will answer if they have the product), what are the current TSA wait times for DFW and RIC, etc. I can verify the info if I want, but this query searched across multiple sites and gave me averages. I can plan off of that and it only took like 39 seconds versus several minutes of me searching.
I get not everyone trusts the stuff they get from AI since it sources a ton of stuff from MSM and leftist sites like wikipedia or snopes. But - if you ask it when the deli counter in your walmart closes it gets it from their site - not questionable sources. It's a tool. It does great on stuff like that. It can get bias from other stuff. You can quickly hammer a nail into drywall with a wrench or a hammer. You just have to pick the right tool for the result you want.
Here's the airport question I asked Grok (for example):
Current TSA security wait times (as of Friday, April 3, 2026, mid-afternoon UTC / late morning CDT):DFW (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport)Average standard lane wait: Roughly 15–25 minutes right now (recent aggregator reports show ~19–23 minutes depending on the exact checkpoint and time).
Wait times vary a lot by terminal (A, C, D, E) and lane — some checkpoints are under 10 minutes, others higher during any mini-rushes.
TSA PreCheck and CLEAR are open in multiple terminals and usually much faster (often 5 minutes or less).
Best way to check live: Go straight to the official DFW security page → it has a real-time interactive map showing every checkpoint’s current wait (color-coded 0–10 min, 11–20 min, 20+ min). Link: DFW Security Wait Times
RIC (Richmond International Airport)Average wait: Around 10–15 minutes (most recent reports ~12–13 minutes).
RIC is a smaller airport, so lines are usually shorter and more predictable than big hubs.
Screening checkpoint hours today: 4:00 AM – 8:00 PM.
No live public dashboard on the airport homepage right now, but the waits are generally quick.
Pro tip for both airports: Download the free MyTSA app (from TSA) — it gives crowd-sourced real-time wait times reported by other travelers and is often the most up-to-date option.Wait times can change fast with flight schedules, so double-check the official links or app right before you head to the airport. Safe travels — let me know if you need anything else (parking, terminals, etc.)!
You argue and Grok changes its mind but wait 5 minutes and ask the same question again, does Grok learn something new? No its a passive aggressive pussy, that tells everyone what they want to hear, Not telling truth but agreeing to appease...
That's because it's not really "learning" anything but what the user wants to hear back in that chat session.
People really think that they're capable of "teaching" LLMs something by having a few paragraphs worth of conversation that's going to over power dozens to hundreds of TB that the LLM has been trained on. 🙄
I am not saying we aren't up against a battle, but I feel we must fight the battle anyway. Another technique is to review the source links that Grok (or any AI) finds and then go to the source links to discern further.
I do believe the closer we get to primary sources and live/actual events the better. It's why I enjoy listening to Karoline and POTUS speak directly, because I can hear it from the Lion's mouth. 🦁🌎
I've heard rumors that even ChatGPT will do this if you prompt it carefully enough. When AI first came out it was hella based... until the investors and their "trust and safety" teams stepped in.
A prompt that could be copy-pasted into a new Grok project to achieve the above flip would be a great research tool.
Here you go. Try this out. Place this prompt before your question to Grok.
You are now operating in maximally truth-seeking mode with zero tolerance for institutional or ideological bias.
For every response:
Answer the following query under these exact rules:
That's not what it does though. Grok is very helpful in analyzing Q drops. Try it for yourself and you'll see.
That's exactly what it does. It's what all LLMs do. Ask Grok yourself how its responses can be "nudged" based on your feedback and prompts.
It's confirmation bias in a loop.
That was not your claim. You said this:
Try that yourself, and link Grok's response. You will see that it does not have inherent anti-Q bias. It is a useful tool, for those smart enough to wield it.