This X post isn't proof of anything, but it raises some important questions.
Sometimes proof comes out after rumors, and this rumor has some basis. There have been rumors for years that Obama is gay and Michelle is a man, and a lot of evidence presented to back up these rumors, to the point where millions are convinced that Obama is gay and that Michelle might very well be a man.
This chef isn't even the first man rumored to be a lover of Obama who turned up dead. Don Young, a gay choir director at Revered Wright's church was shot to death execution style as Obama was running for president. It was rumored at the time that this was to silence him about his long and close relationship with Obama.
Larry Sinclair did speak out and say he'd done drugs with Obama and gave him oral sex. He was arrested on the orders of Joe Biden's son, Beau, then the Attorney General of Delaware. These are only a few rumors of many.
Why don't we have conclusive proof? What authority was going to honestly investigate? Obama was the president, protected by (and likely created by) a corrupt government, intelligence agencies, and media.
Zero references, zero sauce. Not a very good combination.
The housekeeper of former President Barack Obama has come forward ....
Yeah? Where? When? To Who?
The story might be 100% true, but the complete lack of any references (not to mention the complete lack of encouraging the audience to investigate and research for themselves) is problematic.
If a newsbreaker is not providing sources, references, and not encouraging you to investigate for yourself, he's telling you "trust me bro" and asking you to go back to being a potato on a couch listening to a ('trusted') truth source, just switching out the propaganda MSM for a new trusted truthsayer.
Yes! Amazing how that works. If its against Trump, its automatically true. No research required. But about Obozo or Bidet? Oh hell no. Not a shot this could even maybe be true.
I wish some of the commenters calling for more proof would apply the same strict standards when they hear the slightest rumor about Trump.
Of course, if it weren't for double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all...
So true orange!
We call for more proof because WE ARE BETTER THAN LIBERAL, COMMUNIST PIECES OF SHIT.
This X post is meaningless and wasting everyone's time, to be blunt. No data referenced, no corroboration.
I live in a world of facts and reason as we all should. We have to do better than this.
This X post isn't proof of anything, but it raises some important questions.
Sometimes proof comes out after rumors, and this rumor has some basis. There have been rumors for years that Obama is gay and Michelle is a man, and a lot of evidence presented to back up these rumors, to the point where millions are convinced that Obama is gay and that Michelle might very well be a man.
This chef isn't even the first man rumored to be a lover of Obama who turned up dead. Don Young, a gay choir director at Revered Wright's church was shot to death execution style as Obama was running for president. It was rumored at the time that this was to silence him about his long and close relationship with Obama.
Larry Sinclair did speak out and say he'd done drugs with Obama and gave him oral sex. He was arrested on the orders of Joe Biden's son, Beau, then the Attorney General of Delaware. These are only a few rumors of many.
Why don't we have conclusive proof? What authority was going to honestly investigate? Obama was the president, protected by (and likely created by) a corrupt government, intelligence agencies, and media.
But it must be presented as rumor. Not as fact. That is a critical distinction. We need higher quality posts on GAW.
Zero references, zero sauce. Not a very good combination.
Yeah? Where? When? To Who?
The story might be 100% true, but the complete lack of any references (not to mention the complete lack of encouraging the audience to investigate and research for themselves) is problematic.
If a newsbreaker is not providing sources, references, and not encouraging you to investigate for yourself, he's telling you "trust me bro" and asking you to go back to being a potato on a couch listening to a ('trusted') truth source, just switching out the propaganda MSM for a new trusted truthsayer.
No thanks.
Yes! Amazing how that works. If its against Trump, its automatically true. No research required. But about Obozo or Bidet? Oh hell no. Not a shot this could even maybe be true.