full pic is on this site, and appeared to be used as the twitter banner of the account that posted "Cole Allen", however the twitter account was not archived until recently, so we don't know how long it's been the twitter banner.
Appreciated but research would seem kind of pointless in that scenario. True I agree the cabal can easily manipulate and alter history on the internet to some extent.
But in this case, why would they want to fake the history of the accounts banner image. Since it is archived on the wayback machine, and the date is listed on the study itself where the image originates, 5/5/2022. (5:5)
Both of those would need to be in on it to, or hacked by the deepstate. But then the time machine website would presumably notice right now if the pic in their article had been changed with all this attention brought to it?
For Example, I only discovered Q in 2021. I then went down the rabbithole and researched and verified all of the old prominent Q proofs to know if i could believe them, I never saw Q post in real time, I can only trust the archives and tweets and youtube videos etc. to verify the timestamps on Q's posts that are vital to Q proofs. If i can't trust those sources, how can i trust anything?
full pic is on this site, and appeared to be used as the twitter banner of the account that posted "Cole Allen", however the twitter account was not archived until recently, so we don't know how long it's been the twitter banner.
But the image is archived and from 2022
https://web.archive.org/web/20220506165611/https://www.timemachine.eu/study-on-quality-in-3d-digitisation-of-tangible-cultural-heritage/
https://www.timemachine.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/distinct-mind-Js9auX5_9R8-unsplash-scaled.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/7paf63.mp4
So yeah, some mind fuckery. On the other side this all is only possible when we look into a screen. And the screen may be manipulated in so many ways.
how does the screen get manipulated?
It's like the digital currency. You don't owe the money. You have the permission to use it. And when your actions are not welcome, the money is gone.
Who stands behind all the pictures and news. We don't trust the MSM because they obviously lied to us to much. But who can we trust.
Screen is zeros and ones. The picture is made of digits.
All this mind fuckery is only possible in our world that relies on computers.
But no offense. I'm grateful that you are providing the links to the original source. So everyone can make their own conclusions.
Appreciated but research would seem kind of pointless in that scenario. True I agree the cabal can easily manipulate and alter history on the internet to some extent.
But in this case, why would they want to fake the history of the accounts banner image. Since it is archived on the wayback machine, and the date is listed on the study itself where the image originates, 5/5/2022. (5:5)
Both of those would need to be in on it to, or hacked by the deepstate. But then the time machine website would presumably notice right now if the pic in their article had been changed with all this attention brought to it?
For Example, I only discovered Q in 2021. I then went down the rabbithole and researched and verified all of the old prominent Q proofs to know if i could believe them, I never saw Q post in real time, I can only trust the archives and tweets and youtube videos etc. to verify the timestamps on Q's posts that are vital to Q proofs. If i can't trust those sources, how can i trust anything?