Why was the original video the poor quality of a big foot vid? Always, always, always out of focus, just out of frame, and poor quality in general. It really makes me wonder if the original vids are AI generated so the reporters can have B-roll footage of the happening. What is the purpose of a grainy vid? To keep people in the dark? Kinda like the 9/11 vids of the towers coming down. How many thousands of tourists were there and had the ability to capture the twoers on film just after the planes crashed into them? I rarely, if ever see those vids. Hmmmm.
About 12 years ago, I had to pull some video of a bank robbery for a client. The video was so bad, it looked like they were robbed by a mountain. It was an old camera system.
So I'm not shocked when bad video surfaces. But I'd expect anything to be at least 720p at this point. 1080 cameras were the standard a decade ago. Any security perimeter hosting VVIPs should use 4k at this point.
Why was the original video the poor quality of a big foot vid? Always, always, always out of focus, just out of frame, and poor quality in general. It really makes me wonder if the original vids are AI generated so the reporters can have B-roll footage of the happening. What is the purpose of a grainy vid? To keep people in the dark? Kinda like the 9/11 vids of the towers coming down. How many thousands of tourists were there and had the ability to capture the twoers on film just after the planes crashed into them? I rarely, if ever see those vids. Hmmmm.
About 12 years ago, I had to pull some video of a bank robbery for a client. The video was so bad, it looked like they were robbed by a mountain. It was an old camera system.
So I'm not shocked when bad video surfaces. But I'd expect anything to be at least 720p at this point. 1080 cameras were the standard a decade ago. Any security perimeter hosting VVIPs should use 4k at this point.