So many people don't have any idea that we've been under maritime admiralty law for so long. The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. The yellow with tassels is actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law? We are surrounded/covered by maritime admiralty law. That's why all the flags in federal government buildings and courtrooms have the gold tassels. We are a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America.
KING AND QUEEN'S VISIT SIGNIFIES END OF BRITISH MARITIME LAW - WE ARE SOVEREIGN AND FREE OF BRITISH RULE FOR THE FIRST TIME!
The British king and queen's visit to America is part of the final stages of the nation’s dismantling of British Admiralty Law, a critical step required for America to legally restore its sovereign state. Stops will be made in Washington, D.C., the 9/11 Memorial, and Virginia, with each location holding specific symbolic and historical significance tied to Britain's long-standing system that has quietly governed America for well over a century.
This process requires the living authority to appear in person at the exact centers of origin, control, and operation. This legal requirement makes the Crown’s participation mandatory as America fulfills the conditions to restore its sovereignty. Physical presence and public witness complete the legal record, with the King and Queen serving as the two living witnesses providing full and lawful testimony that America has fulfilled the conditions necessary to restore its sovereign state. As the living head of the British Crown that has governed America through Admiralty Law, the King carries the essential authority to lawfully sign off on the end of that system, the return of America’s sovereignty, and the shift back to the law of the land.
Together, their appearances at the highest levels of governance create a visible confirmation that the corporate maritime system is being brought to its lawful end in America, at its centers of power within the country.
I've always been somewhat leery of this Maritime Law / Fealty to Britain discussion. I admit I haven't dug into it deeply because there are already too many futile rabbit holes to go down.
So does anyone here have 100-words or less proof that it was ever an actual situation and NOT just another conspiracy theory?
I'm with you Bob. I've only seen influencers posting this with zero actual facts to go with it. I don't see why a visit from the King automatically means he capitulated. The Queen visited in 2007.. how is this any different?
I would expect that something so huge would have an official announcement. Maybe at the 250th celebration? I guess we'll have to wait and see.
So many people don't have any idea that we've been under maritime admiralty law for so long. The gold fringe flag is not the same flag that is approved for our Constitutional Republic in USA code Title 4 Ch 1 & Ch 2. The fourth color (yellow) is not approved in the code. The yellow with tassels is actually representative of war-time in the law of the sea/admiralty law? We are surrounded/covered by maritime admiralty law. That's why all the flags in federal government buildings and courtrooms have the gold tassels. We are a corporation that goes by the name of UNITED STATES. In other words, we are not in a republic, and we are not dealing with the constitutional United States of America.
KING AND QUEEN'S VISIT SIGNIFIES END OF BRITISH MARITIME LAW - WE ARE SOVEREIGN AND FREE OF BRITISH RULE FOR THE FIRST TIME!
The British king and queen's visit to America is part of the final stages of the nation’s dismantling of British Admiralty Law, a critical step required for America to legally restore its sovereign state. Stops will be made in Washington, D.C., the 9/11 Memorial, and Virginia, with each location holding specific symbolic and historical significance tied to Britain's long-standing system that has quietly governed America for well over a century.
This process requires the living authority to appear in person at the exact centers of origin, control, and operation. This legal requirement makes the Crown’s participation mandatory as America fulfills the conditions to restore its sovereignty. Physical presence and public witness complete the legal record, with the King and Queen serving as the two living witnesses providing full and lawful testimony that America has fulfilled the conditions necessary to restore its sovereign state. As the living head of the British Crown that has governed America through Admiralty Law, the King carries the essential authority to lawfully sign off on the end of that system, the return of America’s sovereignty, and the shift back to the law of the land.
Together, their appearances at the highest levels of governance create a visible confirmation that the corporate maritime system is being brought to its lawful end in America, at its centers of power within the country.
H/T Carolee Merrill
I've always been somewhat leery of this Maritime Law / Fealty to Britain discussion. I admit I haven't dug into it deeply because there are already too many futile rabbit holes to go down.
So does anyone here have 100-words or less proof that it was ever an actual situation and NOT just another conspiracy theory?
At this point, pretty much every conspiracy theory of the last 30 years is coming true, so this is likely as well...
https://nitter.poast.org/i/status/2049552836027904040
This has been brought up over and over.
It's usually some random X account declaring Maritme/Admirality Law is over.
If this is actually the case, why can't this be spoken about in the open?
Why can't Trump just openly address this to the nation?
Clearly, if this is what occurred, whatever the blockades/threats were that kept Trump from doing this for the US in the past are gone.
Are/were these rules, this process to regain sovereignty, actually written as a law or some other metric, somewhere?
Otherwise, it's great theater.
Honest question. Not trying to be difficult, fren.
I'm with you Bob. I've only seen influencers posting this with zero actual facts to go with it. I don't see why a visit from the King automatically means he capitulated. The Queen visited in 2007.. how is this any different?
I would expect that something so huge would have an official announcement. Maybe at the 250th celebration? I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Who is going to make the official announcement? Certainly, not the fake news.
Agreed
What does this translate into for the average person's?
"sperging"