These are two big experiments that the democrats use against Americans. One reason why they push fake polls all of the time. The liberal media uses both.
What we’re finding now is many of these landmark experiments and examples from the Cold War. Used to justify popular psychology and peoples pet political ideologies for decades. Either can’t be reliably reproduced today.
Or were cooked from the word go to produce results that confirmed the Hypothesis of the experimenters. The Stanford Prison experiment is a famous example from the era. That according to participants and documentation from the experiment was cooked to suit the professors hypothesis.
There are also doubts and critiques of the results of the Milgram experiment and later replications of it. Including poor variable control.
Part of broader replicability problems in psychology as a broader whole. In short you shouldn’t take the results of any of it as unvarnished truth of human behavior. Especially experiments from the ‘Golden age’ of psychology. Sensationalist results got funding, awards, and job offers. Inconsistent or inconsequential results didn’t. Thusly the incentive for them was to create sensationalist results.
Sinuses to think the Stanford Prison Experiment.was a little flawed, too, until I served as a Sailor in a Marine unit and got to see for myself how the Corps operates. They rely on social pressure, along with some "light" brainwashing to ensure Marines conform to the system.
I got to see plenty of times how one Marine would speak out and question an order's legitimacy and then got to see how the authority figures responded.
Now I don't think Millgram's and Asch's experiments aren't far from the truth.
Also, what better way to silence questioners than by using authority to gaslight the public into obedience?
"Maybe" those studies and papers questioning those are experiments are actually gaslighting attempts by authority.
These are two big experiments that the democrats use against Americans. One reason why they push fake polls all of the time. The liberal media uses both.
What we’re finding now is many of these landmark experiments and examples from the Cold War. Used to justify popular psychology and peoples pet political ideologies for decades. Either can’t be reliably reproduced today.
Or were cooked from the word go to produce results that confirmed the Hypothesis of the experimenters. The Stanford Prison experiment is a famous example from the era. That according to participants and documentation from the experiment was cooked to suit the professors hypothesis.
https://theconversation.com/the-infamous-stanford-prison-experiment-was-flawed-so-why-is-it-still-so-influential-today-246881
There are also doubts and critiques of the results of the Milgram experiment and later replications of it. Including poor variable control.
Part of broader replicability problems in psychology as a broader whole. In short you shouldn’t take the results of any of it as unvarnished truth of human behavior. Especially experiments from the ‘Golden age’ of psychology. Sensationalist results got funding, awards, and job offers. Inconsistent or inconsequential results didn’t. Thusly the incentive for them was to create sensationalist results.
Sinuses to think the Stanford Prison Experiment.was a little flawed, too, until I served as a Sailor in a Marine unit and got to see for myself how the Corps operates. They rely on social pressure, along with some "light" brainwashing to ensure Marines conform to the system.
I got to see plenty of times how one Marine would speak out and question an order's legitimacy and then got to see how the authority figures responded.
Now I don't think Millgram's and Asch's experiments aren't far from the truth.
Also, what better way to silence questioners than by using authority to gaslight the public into obedience?
"Maybe" those studies and papers questioning those are experiments are actually gaslighting attempts by authority.
The 60% were all registered Democrats.
Probably