🔥🔥🔥No longer a conspiracy theory! 🔥🔥🔥
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Thank you Lord!
This was a large part of my awakening - trusting my own eyes more than trusting what I was "told".
GREAT NEWS ABOUT THE BATTLE AGAINST CHEMTRAILS ✈️⛅️☀️
Dear Friends,
For years, millions of people have looked up at the skies and asked the same questions:
What are those trails spreading across the atmosphere? Why do some disappear quickly while others expand into massive white haze that blankets the sky? Why has the public never received clear answers? And why have governments and regulatory agencies consistently avoided addressing this directly?
For the past two years, researchers, legal experts, public health advocates, and environmental investigators have conducted one of the most extensive independent investigations ever undertaken into these questions.
What we uncovered is far bigger than most people realize.
After hundreds of hours of scientific analysis, federal regulatory review, atmospheric data investigation, and legal research, we are now prepared to publicly reveal what we found.
This is not speculation. This is not internet rumor.
This is a formal federal legal action backed by peer-reviewed science, government data, documented atmospheric evidence, and the government’s own records.
A landmark Petition for Rulemaking has now been formally filed with the EPA. For the first time, a comprehensive legal and scientific case regarding atmospheric aerosol operations and emissions has been placed directly into the federal record.
The EPA is now legally required to respond.
The clock has started.
The agency has 180 days to answer. If it refuses to act, the next step is federal court.
This changes everything.
For over twenty years, citizens, researchers, legislators, and environmental activists have asked the right questions while lacking a complete legal and scientific framework to force accountability.
Now that framework exists.
For the first time, the science, legal mechanisms, regulatory pathways, documented evidence, and accountability structure have all been unified into one coordinated federal action.
We are no longer merely asking questions.
We are demanding answers.
And this time, those answers cannot simply be ignored.
What we uncovered challenges many assumptions people have held for years. Some findings may surprise even longtime researchers. But the evidence speaks for itself.
This is not a replay of old debates.
This is entirely new ground.
And it is historic.
Joining this effort are leading researchers and advocates including James Franklin Lee Jr. of ClimateViewer News LLC, Reinette Senum of GenSeven and SaveOurSkies.org, Leslie Manookian of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, Michael Hogan of Missouri Clean Skies, and Valerie Ferrell of Stand for Health Freedom.
During the public webinar, the coalition will present:
• Scientific evidence and atmospheric data • Federal documents exposing regulatory failures • The legal strategy now in motion • What this means for state-level efforts nationwide • The path forward toward genuine atmospheric accountability and clean skies
Monday, May 4, 2026 5:00 PM Pacific
Streaming live on YouTube, Rumble, and X.
A live Q&A will follow.
Bring your questions. Bring your skepticism. Bring your evidence.
We will bring ours.
Two years ago, this investigation began with questions. What was uncovered revealed a much larger picture involving atmospheric operations, regulatory failures, environmental consequences, and institutional silence that can no longer be ignored.
The era of vague speculation is ending.
The era of evidence, legal accountability, and direct federal challenge has begun.
Monday night, the public will finally see the full picture.
youtube.com/live/jGlVChXfN…
A notable aspect of this group is that they eschew any collaboration with Dane Wigington.
Myself, I have always been suspicious of Dane. His persona strikes me as "off," for starters. And when you dig into his body of work several red flags pop out. I'm not proclaiming a final judgement mind you.
"what you're seeing is water vapor. We're just spraying the sky with water in an effort to trap chlorine molecules, caused by CFC refrigerant venting. You should thank us. You're welcome."
There was nothing wrong with R-12. Other than DuPont's patent was about to expire. So, they developed R-134. Then, they paid off the government to declare R-12 a risk to the environment. Finally, they introduced "Ozone friendly" R-134, of which they held the patent. Guaranteed profits for the duration of the patent.
Oh I know. They love invisible boogiemen. Look out! There's a CFC over there!
Posted 3 hours ago…..the mods must have the day off…KEK!
Good old Reinette! It looks like she is really making some headway. The fight against chemtrails included Clifford Carnicom, Rosalind Peterson, and then Dane Wiggington. Over 20 years. From the start, air samples showed they were spraying strontium, barium and aluminum in the spray.
I distinctly remember when Bush Jr. was president, a press conference by someone in his administration in the White House Rose Garden. He talked about how the government was seeding the climate via commercial jets by putting a compound in their jet fuel. He said this on national television. He didn't mention chem trails. But he didn't have to. He literally described them and how they were being implemented. He admitted to the entire world what they were doing. But that didn't stop the deep state's propaganda machine from saying chemtrails were a conspiracy theory.
Contrails have been around since World War II, when airplanes were able to fly high enough for exhaust water vapor to freeze into ice crystals. And the persistence of the trails was always a function of the altitude and humidity conditions at which they were formed, higher being more persistent. In the 1980s, airlines began to operate airliners that flew at higher altitudes, thus more persistence. They cross the sky...and they are meaningless. Eventually--like any other high altitude cloud--they will dilute with the air and dissipate. Consider that the only reason you can see them is because they are brighter than the sky background. The idea that they are blocking sunlight is facetious. People must not have any experience of cumulus clouds. (I live in the Pacific Northwest, and pervasive overcast is a frequent fact of life. It only dims the sunlight slightly. We have no problem growing crops and exceedingly thick forests, and getting suntans.) I live under an approach/departure corridor for Seattle-Tacoma International airport and see contrails all the time. They are a nothingburger. No one gives them a second thought. In my long life (3/4 of a century), they have never been a popular subject of concern. (We are more concerned about the prospect of rainfall.) They impair nothing.
As for the chemicals, good luck proving they come from airplane exhaust. Jet fuel is rigorously formulated to preclude metals, which can gum up turbines with slag. Some of the elements mentioned in the complaint are common in brake linings, and the dust from brake wear can easily be windborne away from roadways. Dust from many states away can commonly be carried westward on the prevailing winds (e.g., the Oklahoma Dust Bowl erosion). Other mineral elements are consistent with the approximately 50 tons/day of meteoric matter drifting down on us---which no one mentions. (It is true that the internal components of turbine engines and fuel feed systems can result in transition metals chemically interacting with fuel, a condition which is known to be adverse to engine performance and is prevented as much as possible. A reference on this point is available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016236125023981.)
Much noise has been made about the few cases where state governments have outlawed this supposed aerial pollution. Contrails continue. No airline will ever be convicted of pollution from generating ice crystals, since it is chemically impossible to combust hydrocarbons without generating water vapor (and thus form contrails).
The one good thing about this latest approach is that they had the wisdom to distance themselves from Dane Wiggington, who profoundly does not know what he is talking about.
Fucking what? Wait chemtrails are real??? This timeline is so fucked up lmfao
Can't believe I found this with Google.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15236778/
Chronic wasting disease from over 20 years ago.
Why would Lee Zeldin wait 180 days to release the info?
I'm in the Phoenix area and they are using as Guinea pigs everyday trying to see how fast they can cool the temp. It is "cloudy" most days now which is insane. It's may and it should have started we to get really hot here already but it's not. We have a strange haze in our skies most but it never rains. I have so many pictures and videos of this insanity..What is the scariest tome is when I talk to people about the stripes in our skies and they have no idea what I'm talking about. Wtf? Look up people! I wish I knew how to find out who is paying for this as it's must be really expensive to do this day in and day out.
The extent of airline traffic is generally underappreciated by the common person. It is always there. When you have humid weather, the contrails persist. If the weather is arid, they go away. I've been to Phoenix in late summer. Incredibly torrid in the afternoon, with no cloud in the sky. Like a dry sauna. If you want raw sunlight, more power to you.
We're not talking about contrails. This is geoengineerg. I've lived here for 32 years and yes it's hot but it's the freaking desert. I do not choose chemicals being sprayed to block out sunlight. I know what a contrail looks like, that is not what is happening, wake up!
If it is geoengineering, you shouldn't be referring to contrails in your complaints. I've been observing persistent and non-persistent contrails for the past 70 years and that is all we have. (Plus, I am an aeronautical engineer and it is my business to know about them.)
I will make you a prediction: for any state that outlaws "geoengineering," there will be no cessation of contrails, and no indictments for geoengineering. But I will drop the argument. Do not be too surprised if the subject fails to gain ground.
I am not in favor of geoengineering, by the way. It is ill-advised and futile. For any such enterprise to have a significant effect, it would need a massive program. Nature is big. Human impact is small. I hope we can agree that cloud-seeding for rain stimulation is benign (it leaves no trails and sometimes we need the rain).
Just as a friendly aside, have you had an opportunity to view the meteor crater near Barringer? It is truly a spectacle. One feels like an ant on the rim of a teacup.