Yes, in fact, some of us did read/hear it. Did you?
As I heard/read it, neither parent wanted their kids jabbed - hence why the kids were NOT jabbed prior to the divorce. Those kids had never been "vaccinated" and the mother, prior to being given the ultimatum by the asshole judge, did not want the kids vaccinated as you claimed. The judge was, effectively, forcing the jab on the kids by stating that whichever parent agreed to "vaccinate" them would get custody. The mother caved in so she could get custody of the kids. The video and transcript use that exact language - she "caved in".
If neither parent had agreed, who knows what the malevolent judge would have done - perhaps force the kids into foster care (and they'd, I'm sure, be happy to acquiesce to the evil judge's demands to have those children jabbed). The mother did not abandon the kids; the parents were given an untenable choice. If it were me I would have fled the state with my kids and gone to an attorney who would fight for both parents' desire to not have their kids jabbed regardless of marital status.
You also claim she initiated the divorce, that she abandoned the kids afterwards, that the kids' father is paying her child support. Tell me where in that video or the transcript ANY of that was stated. Maybe I missed it, but on looking again I still don't see it. Give me a time stamp. Or did you get this from a different source? If so, provide the source for your claims.
.
–StanceDancing 1 hour ago +2 / -0
Did anyone actually read the source? The mother ABANDONED THE KIDS, after she was the one to both initiate the divorce, AND want the kids vaxxed.
After the youngest needed around the clock care because of this, she LEFT and he still PAYS CHILD SUPPORT TO HER.
This is honestly a case of how fucked up custody/family court is in general. That mother should be jailed.
Yes, I actually READ THE ARTICLE THAT THE VIDEO IS TALKING ABOUT. I did not watch the video because I do not have time for it, literally look in the comments for the source that this video is based on. If what you're saying is what is in the video, the video MISREPRESENTED EVERYTHING. Please please please read the article listed here.
I stand corrected, anon. I listened to the video and read the accompanying TRANSCRIPT, not the article which I just saw OP had linked in a separate comment. When you said "read the source" I took it as the video-transcript. You're correct and thank you for your persistence.
The video mentions nothing of what I questioned you on so, yes, it appears the video "conveniently omitted" the nasty parts of the cited article.
I just want stuff like this to be in the public conscious, because it truly is abhorrent what judges and average people are able to do to destroy other's lives. And it's disingenuous for the video not to mention any of it!
It is disingenuous to "sanitize" what occurred with all this, agreed, but I suspect the podcaster wanted the focus firmly on the demon judge and only for his imposition of the stipulation that custody of those kids required they get jabbed and how that resulted in destroying the little boy's life. His gist here seems to be parental rights, judicial overreach and body sovereignty.
Also, the podcast guy may have based his video on information he saw about this incident which may not have included all the nasty divorce proceedings and sleazy lawyer maneuvers the article speaks of. I've seen too many households destroyed during marital problems where one or both parents use the kids as pawns. The children suffer and incidents like this one are heartbreaking.
Yes, in fact, some of us did read/hear it. Did you?
As I heard/read it, neither parent wanted their kids jabbed - hence why the kids were NOT jabbed prior to the divorce. Those kids had never been "vaccinated" and the mother, prior to being given the ultimatum by the asshole judge, did not want the kids vaccinated as you claimed. The judge was, effectively, forcing the jab on the kids by stating that whichever parent agreed to "vaccinate" them would get custody. The mother caved in so she could get custody of the kids. The video and transcript use that exact language - she "caved in".
If neither parent had agreed, who knows what the malevolent judge would have done - perhaps force the kids into foster care (and they'd, I'm sure, be happy to acquiesce to the evil judge's demands to have those children jabbed). The mother did not abandon the kids; the parents were given an untenable choice. If it were me I would have fled the state with my kids and gone to an attorney who would fight for both parents' desire to not have their kids jabbed regardless of marital status.
You also claim she initiated the divorce, that she abandoned the kids afterwards, that the kids' father is paying her child support. Tell me where in that video or the transcript ANY of that was stated. Maybe I missed it, but on looking again I still don't see it. Give me a time stamp. Or did you get this from a different source? If so, provide the source for your claims.
.
–StanceDancing 1 hour ago +2 / -0
Did anyone actually read the source? The mother ABANDONED THE KIDS, after she was the one to both initiate the divorce, AND want the kids vaxxed.
After the youngest needed around the clock care because of this, she LEFT and he still PAYS CHILD SUPPORT TO HER.
This is honestly a case of how fucked up custody/family court is in general. That mother should be jailed.
Yes, I actually READ THE ARTICLE THAT THE VIDEO IS TALKING ABOUT. I did not watch the video because I do not have time for it, literally look in the comments for the source that this video is based on. If what you're saying is what is in the video, the video MISREPRESENTED EVERYTHING. Please please please read the article listed here.
I stand corrected, anon. I listened to the video and read the accompanying TRANSCRIPT, not the article which I just saw OP had linked in a separate comment. When you said "read the source" I took it as the video-transcript. You're correct and thank you for your persistence.
The video mentions nothing of what I questioned you on so, yes, it appears the video "conveniently omitted" the nasty parts of the cited article.
No problem, thank you for being kind about it!
I just want stuff like this to be in the public conscious, because it truly is abhorrent what judges and average people are able to do to destroy other's lives. And it's disingenuous for the video not to mention any of it!
It is disingenuous to "sanitize" what occurred with all this, agreed, but I suspect the podcaster wanted the focus firmly on the demon judge and only for his imposition of the stipulation that custody of those kids required they get jabbed and how that resulted in destroying the little boy's life. His gist here seems to be parental rights, judicial overreach and body sovereignty.
Also, the podcast guy may have based his video on information he saw about this incident which may not have included all the nasty divorce proceedings and sleazy lawyer maneuvers the article speaks of. I've seen too many households destroyed during marital problems where one or both parents use the kids as pawns. The children suffer and incidents like this one are heartbreaking.