We're not looking for a fight, but Iran also cannot be allowed to block innocent countries and their goods from an international waterway."
"Iran is the clear aggressor, harassing civilian vessels, threatening mariners from every nation indiscriminately, and weaponizing a critical choke point for its own financial benefits. At least trying to. For too long, Iran has been harassing ships, shooting at civilian tankers from all nations."
100% that is how I see all this. So many claiming we are Israel's puppets doing their bidding etc...The way I see it this is about getting NuUkes out of jihadissts hands and saving brothers and sisters in Christ (as well as the rest of the innocent) who are trapped under this regime.
Trump ended it, so doesn't that reset the 60 day clock if he has to go back in? How long would it take to litigate that if it were to happen, he'll be done before the case gets heard.
I'm not a handshake. Due to a technical glitch I lost access to my original account. This account is fairly new. However, I've been here for many years.
ME: If Iran attacks the US or other innocent vessels being escorted or otherwise under the protection of the US Navy, can Trump start a new conflict which would essentially "restart the clock" on the war powers act and give another 60 days?
AI: Yes — if Iran initiates a new armed attack on U.S. forces or vessels under U.S. protection, the President can treat that as a new armed conflict and the War Powers Resolution 60‑day clock would restart.
Bottom Line:
Ending “Operation Epic Fury” resets the legal baseline.
“Project Freedom” is framed as a non‑hostile mission.
If Iran attacks U.S. forces or protected vessels, the President can treat it as a new conflict.
Under the War Powers Resolution, that does restart the 60‑day clock.
This is consistent with decades of bipartisan executive practice.
The shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz are two 2-mile-wide corridors managed under a Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) by the International Maritime Organization, with one lane for inbound and one for outbound traffic, separated by a 2-mile buffer zone. These lanes are located primarily in Omani territorial waters, though they partially extend into Iranian waters.
Iran controls the northern side of the strait. Oman controls the south.
If planned properly, NO SHIP NEEDS TO ENTER IRANIAN WATERS.
For example: There are two 2-mile wide corridors with a 2-mile buffer zone... assuming ship traffic incoming and outgoing at the same time.
If it's coordinated (like the Suez canal) so that 10 ships EXIT the strait all at one time, then 10 ships can ENTER the strait ... so all ship traffic is moving one direction at a time... you only need one shipping lane. Turning is much easier, ships can transit quicker and every ship stays at least 2-3 miles away from Iranian territory. There's a buffer zone. If the U.S. navy is there coordinating... it's not hard to organize the ships and get things moving.
Then why in the hell am I seeing gas prices hike by $.20 every day into heights I’ve never seen in my life? Go after these O&G faggots please. Or just go ahead and really put a wrench in the cogs and release zero point for all mankind to utilize.
We're not looking for a fight, but Iran also cannot be allowed to block innocent countries and their goods from an international waterway."
"Iran is the clear aggressor, harassing civilian vessels, threatening mariners from every nation indiscriminately, and weaponizing a critical choke point for its own financial benefits. At least trying to. For too long, Iran has been harassing ships, shooting at civilian tankers from all nations."
I still want the ayatollah regime ended, as soon as possible. Help Persians get their freedom and then get out, with the uranium.
100% that is how I see all this. So many claiming we are Israel's puppets doing their bidding etc...The way I see it this is about getting NuUkes out of jihadissts hands and saving brothers and sisters in Christ (as well as the rest of the innocent) who are trapped under this regime.
It is just freedom of navigation enforcement. No big deal.
Trump ended it, so doesn't that reset the 60 day clock if he has to go back in? How long would it take to litigate that if it were to happen, he'll be done before the case gets heard.
Watch and learn, grasshopper.
You are mouthy, for a handshake. You don't have enough seniority, yet.
I'm not a handshake. Due to a technical glitch I lost access to my original account. This account is fairly new. However, I've been here for many years.
Name checks out!
Here you go HANDSHAKE:
ME: If Iran attacks the US or other innocent vessels being escorted or otherwise under the protection of the US Navy, can Trump start a new conflict which would essentially "restart the clock" on the war powers act and give another 60 days?
AI: Yes — if Iran initiates a new armed attack on U.S. forces or vessels under U.S. protection, the President can treat that as a new armed conflict and the War Powers Resolution 60‑day clock would restart.
Bottom Line:
Ending “Operation Epic Fury” resets the legal baseline.
“Project Freedom” is framed as a non‑hostile mission.
If Iran attacks U.S. forces or protected vessels, the President can treat it as a new conflict.
Under the War Powers Resolution, that does restart the 60‑day clock. This is consistent with decades of bipartisan executive practice.
Link to convo: https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/7yPW7HD1seTYQWpsM8NyU
lol
Yeah I figured you’d go there.
WEAK!
Genius!
Map of Shipping Lanes through Strait of Hormuz
The shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz are two 2-mile-wide corridors managed under a Traffic Separation Scheme (TSS) by the International Maritime Organization, with one lane for inbound and one for outbound traffic, separated by a 2-mile buffer zone. These lanes are located primarily in Omani territorial waters, though they partially extend into Iranian waters.
Iran controls the northern side of the strait. Oman controls the south.
If planned properly, NO SHIP NEEDS TO ENTER IRANIAN WATERS.
For example: There are two 2-mile wide corridors with a 2-mile buffer zone... assuming ship traffic incoming and outgoing at the same time.
If it's coordinated (like the Suez canal) so that 10 ships EXIT the strait all at one time, then 10 ships can ENTER the strait ... so all ship traffic is moving one direction at a time... you only need one shipping lane. Turning is much easier, ships can transit quicker and every ship stays at least 2-3 miles away from Iranian territory. There's a buffer zone. If the U.S. navy is there coordinating... it's not hard to organize the ships and get things moving.
We should send our greatest ally into the Iranian desert. They’ve got lots of troops to spare.
All the reasons why DEMONRATS hate Pete....
Are all the same reasons I love him! (no homo)
I know its cliche but someone has to throw the 4D chess line in. Always a step ahead
Then why in the hell am I seeing gas prices hike by $.20 every day into heights I’ve never seen in my life? Go after these O&G faggots please. Or just go ahead and really put a wrench in the cogs and release zero point for all mankind to utilize.